Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

From_the_Late_Upper_Palaeolithic_to_the

.pdf
Скачиваний:
32
Добавлен:
07.05.2021
Размер:
10 Мб
Скачать
☆

From the Late Upper Palaeolithic to the Neolithic in north-western Armenia

57

this culture are found in altitude and several are caves or rock shelters; all have produced only one level of occupation, and none has been dated by 14C.

Provenance of the obsidian. The study of the provenance of the obsidian used at Kmlo-2 has not enabled the establishment of a link with the Chikiani deposit. In fact, analysis of some thirty artefacts from this site, including 20 Kmlo tools, has shown that the sources of supply were diversified (Fig. 13):

ŒGutansar, which lies at a distance requiring about 7 hours of walking, or 1 day;

ŒTsaghkunyats, at the same distance; but several pieces found at Kmlo-2 have a cortical surface, indicating that original blocks were river cobbles; therefore, they were probably collected in the Kasakh River, which carries many obsidian blocks from its upper course along the Tsaghkunyats range;

ŒArteni, which lies at about 16 hours’ walk from Kmlo-2, that is 2 to 3 days;

ŒOne sample came from the region of Kars (Sarighamish) and was probably sampled in the secondary deposits accumulated by the Kars river at its confluent with the Akhurian;

ŒA last sample came from Geghasar, south-west of Lake Sevan.

In any case, the obsidian is exclusively of local origin; there is no material imported from the Lake Van region, near Çayönü, nor from Chikiani in Georgia.

Conclusions

The prehistoric cultures that developed on Armenian territory, between the Last Glacial Maximum (20,00018,000 BP) and the settlement in the Ararat plain about 7000 BP (or 6000 cal BC) of Neolithic populations that had mastered agriculture and herding (“Aratashen culture”), remain very poorly known. The sites of Kalavan-1 and Kmlo-2 shed some light on this period.

The camp at Kalavan-1, established in the mountains overlooking the north shore of Lake Sevan, provides evidence for the reoccupation by humans of the middle altitude regions (about 1600 m) at the end of the warm phase succeeding the Last Glacial Maximum (15,000-14,000 BC). It demonstrates that these populations were familiar with the migration circuits of wild Caprinae, as well as the location of obsidian sources around Lake Sevan. The technical methods used for knapping and for the transformation of blanks into tools, in particular the many backed pieces and backed points, are typical of the Epigravettian tradition. They relate Kalavan-1 to the Epigravettian culture, known thus far to stretch towards the east to Dniepr basin and Don basin, to western Georgia (Dzudzuana) and south-western Turkey (Öküzini).

The site of Kmlo-2 is evidence for the presence of human groups at the beginning of the Holocene in the region of the Aragats massif. With a cave occupation and a tool kit of microlithic tradition, the culture represented at Kmlo-2 is related to the Mesolithic. But a particular category of artefacts (the “Kmlo tools”), with abrupt, very regular pressure retouch, is reminiscent of both the “Çayönü tools”, present in northern Mesopotamia between the 8th and the 6th millennia BC, and the “hook-like tools” of the Paluri-Nagutny culture which developed on the south-west flank of the Greater Caucasus and then on the high plateaus of southern Georgia in an adjoining period. The relations that existed between Kmlo-2 and these cultures will be the subject of a thorough study.

Moreover, research should especially be continued in order to bring to light the sites of the beginning of the Holocene, which will enable a better understanding of human occupation of Armenia in this period, as well as the origin, for this region, of the domestication process of the flora and the fauna.

58

Christine Chataigner et al.

Bibliography

Adler D.S., Bar-Oz G., Belfer-Cohen A., Bar-Yosef O. 2006, Ahead of the Game, Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Hunting Behaviors in the Southern Caucasus, Current Anthropology 47/1, 89-118.

Adler D.S., Tushabramishvili N. 2004, Middle Palaeolithic Patterns of Settlement and Subsistence in the Southern Caucasus, in: Conard N. (ed.), Middle Palaeolithic Settlement Dynamics, Tübingen, 91-132.

Arimura M., Balasescu A., Chataigner C., Radu V. 2008, L’abri de Tsaghkahovit, in: Chataigner C. (ed.), Mission Caucase, Rapport scientifique 2008, 49-59.

Badalyan R., Lombard P., Chataigner C., Avetisyan 2004, The Neolithic and Chalcolithic Phases in the Ararat Plain Armenia: The View from Aratashen, in : Sagona A. (ed.), A View from the Highlands, Archaeological Studies in Honour of Charles Burney, Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 12, Leuven, 399-420.

Balasescu A., Montoya C., Gasparyan B., Liagre J., Chataigner C., in press, The Upper Palaeolithic Fauna from Kalavan 1 Armenia: Preliminary Results, in: Mashkour M., Beech M. (ed.), Archaeozoology of Southwest Asia and Adjacent Areas, 9th Meeting, 15-20 November 2008, Abu Dhabi.

Bronk Ramsey C. 2009, Bayesian Analyses of Radiocarbon Dates, Radiocarbon 51/1, 337-360.

Cherkinsky A., Chataigner C. 2010, 14C Ages of Bone Fractions from Armenian Prehistoric Sites, Radiocarbon 52/2, 569-577.

Connor S., Kvavadze E. 2008, Modelling Late Quaternary Changes in Plant Distribution, Vegetation and Climate Using Pollen Data from Georgia, Caucasus, Journal of Biogeography 36, 529-545.

Copeland L. 1996, The Flint and Obsidian Industries, in: Akkermans (ed.), Tell Sabi Abyad, The Late Neolithic Settlement, Istanbul, 285-338.

Fujii S. 1988, Typological Reassessment and Some Discussions on “Beaked Blades”, Bulletin of the Okayama Orient Museum 7, 1-16.

Grigolia G.K. 1977, Neolit Tsentral’noj Kolkhidy - Paluri, Tbilisi (in Georgian, Summary in Russian).

Kiguradze T., Menabde M. 2004, The Neolithic of Georgia, in: Sagona A. (ed.), A View from the Highlands, Archaeological Studies in Honour of Charles Burney, Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 12, Leuwen, 345-398.

Meshveliani T., Bar-Oz G., Bar-Yosef O., Belfer-Cohen A., Boaretto E., Jakeli N., Koridze I., Matskevich Z. 2007, Mesolithic Hunters at Kotias Klde, Western Georgia: Preliminary Results, Paléorient 33/2, 47-58.

Lillie M., Budd C., Potekhina I., Hedges R. 2009, The Radiocarbon Reservoir Effect: New Evidence from the Cemeteries of the Middle and Low Dniepr Basin, Ukraine, Journal of Archaeological Science 36, 256-264.

Montoya C. 2004, Les traditions techniques lithiques à l'Epigravettien: analyses de séries du Tardiglaciaire entre Alpes et Méditerranée, Thèse, Université Aix-Marseille I.

Montoya C., Colonge D., Liagre J. 2008, Kalavan 1, un gisement épigravettien dans le Petit Caucase, in: Chataigner C. (ed.), Mission Caucase, Rapport scientifique 2008, 9-23.

Nioradze M. 2001, Le paléolithique supérieur de la Georgie, in: Le Paléolithique supérieur européen. Bilan quinquennal 1996-2001, ERAUL 97, Liège, 27-33.

Nioradze M., Otte M. 2000, Paléolithique supérieur de Géorgie, L’Anthropologie 104, 265-300.

Ollivier V., Nahapetyan S. 2008, Analyse géomorphologique des sites de Kalavan-1 et Kalavan-2, in: Chataigner C. (ed.),

Mission Caucase, Rapport scientifique 2008, 4-8.

Otte M., Lopez Bayon I., Noiret 2003, Sedimentary Deposition Rates and Carbon-14: The Epi-paleolithic Sequence of Öküzini Cave Southwest Turkey, Journal of Archaeological Science 30, 325-341.

Redman C.L. 1982, The Çayönü Chipped Stone Industry: The 1960 and 1970 Excavation Seasons, in: Braidwood L.S., Braidwood R.J. (ed.), Prehistoric Village Archaeology in South Eastern Turkey, British Archaeological Reports, International Series 138, Oxford, 17-71.

Wechler K. 2001, Studien zum Neolithikum der osteuropäischen Steppe, Archäologie in Eurasien 12, Mainz.

From the Late Upper Palaeolithic to the Neolithic in north-western Armenia

59

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig.1. Location of the excavations carried out by the Armenian-French mission.

Fig.2. Kalavan-1: Stratigraphy.

60

Christine Chataigner et al.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig.3. Kalavan-1 (horizon 7d3): Faunal remains (arrows => Caprinae mandibles).

Fig. 4. Kalavan-1 (horizon 7d1): Organisation of the inhabited space.

Code

Level

Locus

Material

Date BP

Date cal. BC (1 sigma)

Ly-3537 (GrA)

7b

H29

Bone

14,070 ± 60 BP

15,032-14,628 cal. BC

Poz-19665

7d

GH33

Bone

14,060 ± 70 BP

15,024-14,611 cal. BC

Poz-19664

7b

F22-2

Bone

13,800 ± 60 BP

14,686-14,280 cal. BC

Ly-3538 (GrA)

7d

H29

Bone

13,750 ± 60 BP

14,619-14,218 cal. BC

UGAMS-03486

7d3

G24

Bone

13,450 ± 40 BP

14,207-13,843 cal. BC

UGAMS-03414

7d1

G22

Charcoal

11,520 ± 50 BP

11,455-11,353 cal. BC

Fig.5. Kalavan-1: 14C datings.

From the Late Upper Palaeolithic to the Neolithic in north-western Armenia

61

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 6. Kalavan-1: Procurement of obsidian, pathways and time of access (GIS modelization).

Fig. 7. Kalavan-1 lithic artefacts: 1-6) backed bladelets and backed points; 7) blade (drawing: G. Devilder).

Fig. 8. Kmlo-2 (or Apnagyugh-8) cave: a) entrance of the cave (east view); b) inside of the cave before excavations.

62

 

 

 

Christine Chataigner et al.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lab. ref.

Material

Date BP

Date cal. AD or BC

Locus

Layer

 

 

(2 sigmas)

(horizon)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ly-13663

charcoal

975 ± 30

1014-1155 AD

D2b

5 (1)

 

 

Ly-12512

charcoal

1095 ± 35

887-1017 AD

C2d

3 or 4

 

 

UGAMS-4077a

burnt bone (Ovis/Capra)

5290 ± 30

4233-4041 BC

C2a

5 (7)

 

 

(bioapatite)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ly-2761 (OxA)

burnt bone (Ovis/Capra)

5515 ± 35

4451-4327 BC

C2a

5 (7)

 

 

Ly-2817 (Sac1777)

charcoal

5555 ± 60

4520-4325 BC

C2d

5 (5)

 

 

UGAMS-4077

burnt bone (Ovis/Capra)

5610 ± 30

4499-4360 BC

C2a

5 (7)

 

 

(collagen)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ly-2762 (OxA)

burnt bone (Ovis/Capra)

6640 ± 40

5631-5509 BC

C2a

5 (7)

 

 

Poz-19666

bone (Ovis/Capra)

8500 ± 50

7596-7492 BC

C2a

5 (7)

 

 

UGAMS-4076a

bone (Ovis/Capra)

8620 ± 30

7686-7581 BC

C2a

5 (7)

 

 

(bioapatite)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UGAMS-4076

Bone (Ovis/Capra)

9840 ± 30

9325-9251 BC

C2a

5 (7)

 

 

(collagen)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AA-68562

bone (Ovis/Capra)

10024 ± 91

9880-9300 BC

D1a

5 (7/8)

 

 

AA-68563

bone (Ovis/Capra)

10184 ± 93

10236-9447 BC

E3b

5 (7/8)

 

 

Poz-20231

bone (fish)

10900 ± 50

10981-10872 BC

C1c

5 (9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig. 9. Kmlo-2: 14C datings (calibration OxCal 4.1, after Bronk Ramsey 2009).

Fig.10. “Kmlo tools”.

Fig.11. Distribution of the “Çayönü tools” (after Fuji 1998).

From the Late Upper Palaeolithic to the Neolithic in north-western Armenia

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fig.12. Artefacts similar to the “Kmlo tools” in Armenia (Gegharot) and Georgia (“hooklike tools” of the Paluri-Nagutny culture).

Fig.13. Kmlo-2: Obsidian procurement and time of access (GIS modelization).