- •Contents
- •Abbreviations and acronyms
- •Introduction
- •1.1. A brief history of money laundering
- •1. Al Capone, 1920–30s
- •2. Meyer Lansky, 1930–50s
- •3. Watergate Scandal, 1973
- •1.2. The first stage: Al Capone tax evasion charges
- •Illicit earnings were mingled with receipts from the laundromat business and then paid back to the mobsters, making an impression of legitimate income
- •1.3. The subsequent stages: better hiding techniques
- •1.4. The appearance of “money laundering” expression in the legal context
- •1.5. Further development of the international aml/cft standards.
- •2.1. Basic concept of money laundering
- •2.2. Predicate offences: the scope and methods of description
- •2.3. Definition of money laundering in the narrow sense
- •2.4. Definition of money laundering in the broad sense
- •2.5. Anti-money laundering measures of combating organized crime
- •2.6. The process of money laundering
- •3.1. Key institutions of a national aml/cft regime
- •Investigation and field operations, e.G. Making searches, taking witness statements
- •3.2. Methodology bases of a risk-based approach and national coordination
- •Identify
- •Implementation
- •3.3. Financial institutions: general definition and their activities and operations related to managing clients’ assets
- •Individual
- •3.4. Financial institutions: other activities and operations
- •3.6. Risk-assessment obligations and decisions for countries
- •Information necessary for conducting aml/cft risk assessments
- •Including changes to
- •4.1. An extension liability for money laundering to the predicate offence perpetrator: the adverse implications for the economy
- •I. The perpetrator of the predicate offence is not held liable for laundering the proceeds
- •II. The perpetrator of the predicate offence is held liable for laundering the proceeds
- •4.2. Dual criminality for offences committed internationally
- •In Beta this conduct is a predicate offence for money laundering
- •In Alpha this conduct is not a predicate offence for money laundering
- •In Beta this conduct is not a predicate offence for money laundering
- •In Alpha this conduct is a predicate offence for money laundering
- •4.3. “State of mind” connected with a money laundering offence
- •Vienna Convention, Art. 2.3
- •4.4. Confiscation and provisional measures
- •Vienna Convention
- •5.1. Social and economic origins of terrorism
- •5.2. Basic concept of terrorist financing
- •5.3. Legal definition of terrorism and terrorist financing
- •Indirectly
- •Its purpose is
- •It is intended to cause
- •5.4. Characteristics of the terrorist financing offence
- •5 .5. Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism, terrorist financing and proliferation
- •6.1. The United Nations bodies of the international aml/cft framework
- •1. The United Nations Security Council (unsc)
- •2. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (unodc)
- •It is responsible for carrying out the Global Program against Money Laundering (gpml est. 1997)
- •6.2. The United Nations organizations of the international aml/cft framework
- •1. The International Monetary Fund (imf)
- •2. The World Bank
- •6.3. Main functions of the Financial Action Taskforce
- •Identifying current money laundering and terrorist financing threats
- •Identification of high-risk and non-cooperative jurisdictions, release of relevant public documents
- •6.6. The Wolfsberg Group of banks and its documents
- •It is an association of eleven global private banks that came together in 2000 to develop aml/cft industry standards
- •7.1. General requirements for aml/cft programs of financial institutions and groups of financial institutions
- •Including appropriate compliance management arrangements
- •Intra-group sharing of information (on customers, accounts and transactions) is required for the purposes of cdd and ml/tf risk management
- •7.2. Methodology approach to customer due diligence
- •Information accompanying wire transfers (r. 16, in)
- •Veracity
- •Verifying the customer’s identity
- •Information
- •7.3. Additional features of the customer due diligence
- •It must be ensured that documents, data and information collected are kept up-to-date
- •It may be permitted to complete the verification as soon as practically possible
- •7.4. Customer due diligence measures for legal persons and their arrangements
- •It should be required to understand the following in relation to customers that are legal persons or legal arrangements, r. 10, in, (c)
- •If different, a principal place of business
- •7.5. Actions of financial institutions in case of inability to comply with customer due diligence requirements
- •If it is not possible for a financial institution to comply with the cdd requirements
- •If there are reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are proceeds of criminal activity or are related to terrorist financing, r. 20
- •If they report their suspicions in good faith, even if they do not know precisely what the underlying activity was (they do not know whether activity was criminal)
- •7.6. Record-keeping requirements for financial institutions
- •Information obtained through the cdd measures
- •8.1. Reliance on customer due diligence information received from third parties
- •8.2. Potentially higher-risk situations for enhanced customer due diligence measures
- •It is mandatory to apply enhanced cdd measures when the fatf calls for it, r. 19
- •It was identified by a mutual evaluation, assessment or published in a follow up report
- •8.3. Lower-risk situations for simplified customer due diligence measures
- •If these requirements can ensure adequate transparence of beneficial ownership
- •It was identified by a mutual evaluation
- •8.4. Enhanced customer due diligence measures
- •Information from public databases
- •Volume of assets
- •Increasing the number and timing of controls applied
- •8.5. Simplified customer due diligence measures
- •Verify the identity of
- •Inferring the purpose and nature of the business relationship
- •Intermediary financial institution(s)
- •Irrespective of whether the originator and the beneficiary are the same person
- •9.1. Aml/cft requirements for cross-border correspondent banking relationships
- •Including whether the institution has been subject to a money laundering or terrorist financing investigation or regulatory action
- •9.2. Definition of wire transfers and activities of involved parties
- •Initiates the wire transfer and transfers the funds on behalf of the originator
- •Includes wire transfers that take place entirely with the borders of the European Economic Area (eea)
- •9.4. Aml/cft measures of information gathering related to wire transfers
- •In the absence of an account
- •9.5. Aml/cft responsibilities of financial institutions performing wire transfers
- •9.6. Aml/cft obligations for persons that provide money or value transfer services
- •If these institutions are subject to aml/cft requirements
- •10.1. Definition of politically exposed persons
- •Individuals who are (have been) entrusted with prominent public functions such as
- •It covers family members and close associates of pePs
- •It does not cover middle ranking or more junior individuals
- •10.2. Additional measures for politically exposed persons
- •In case of a higher risk
- •10.3. Aml/cft requirements for financial institutions with foreign operations
- •If aml/cft legislature of the host country does not permit the implementation of
- •If these measures are not sufficient
- •10.4. Customer due diligence and record-keeping requirements for designated non-financial businesses and professions
- •Independent legal professionals
- •Independent accountants
- •10.5. Other aml/cft requirements for designated non-financial businesses and professions
1.3. The subsequent stages: better hiding techniques
The second stage. Meyer Lansky was born in 1902. By 1930s he became the “Mob’s Accountant”.
Commission of predicate offences in the U.S. (drug trafficking, prostitution, blackmailing, etc.)
A franchise for several gambling tables in the casino of Hotel National in Havana (Cuba)
Havana, Cuba
A bank in Switzerland
Proceeds from crime originated in Florida
Havana, Cuba
Florida
Money is repatriated to the mafia’s accounts in the U.S. as legitimate earnings on investments abroad
Meyer Lansky was fined only $2500. He died in 1983 in Miami Beach. The FBI believed he left behind over $300 million. They never found the money.
The third stage. The Watergate Scandal, 1973.
Mexico
$200 thousand illegal campaign contributions to U.S. President Richard Nixon
A company in Florida
It was Britain's Guardian newspaper that coined the term, referring to the process as “laundering.”
1.4. The appearance of “money laundering” expression in the legal context
1. U.S. Bank Secrecy Act (BSA, 1970).
Established requirements for recordkeeping and reporting by private individuals, banks and other financial institutions.
Designed to help identify the source, volume, and movement of currency and other monetary instruments transported or transmitted into or out of the U.S. or deposited in financial institutions.
Required banks to (1) report cash transactions over $10,000 using the currency transaction report (CTR); (2) properly identify persons conducting transactions; and (3) maintain a paper trail by keeping appropriate records of financial transactions.
2. The expression “money laundering” (ML) first appeared in a judicial or legal context in 1982 in the U.S.
3. U.S. Money Laundering Control Act (1986):
established ML as a federal crime,
prohibited structuring transactions to evade CTR filings,
introduced civil and criminal forfeiture for BSA violations,
directed banks to establish and maintain procedures to ensure and monitor compliance with the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of the BSA.
4. United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vienna Convention, 1988).
The term “anti-money laundering” (AML) was not used in the Convention and it is limited in scope to single predicate offence “drug trafficking”. However the Parties to the Vienna Convention introduce the AML approach by declaring the awareness that illicit traffic generates large financial profits and wealth, enabling transnational criminal organizations to penetrate, contaminate and corrupt the structures of government, legitimate commercial and financial business, and society at all its levels. Therefore the governments are determined to:
deprive persons engaged in illicit traffic of the proceeds of their criminal activities and thereby eliminate their main incentive for so doing,
eliminate the root causes of the problem of abuse of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, including the illicit demand for such drugs and substances and the enormous profits derived from illicit traffic.
Establishment of the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF, 1989). Its goal was to set out AML measures.
Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds of Crime (Strasbourg Convention, 1990).
The FATF 40 Recommendations (1990, revised later) – the international standard for anti-money laundering, it sets out minimal requirements for a national AML/CFT regime.
