- •Тема 1. «Phonetics as one of the branches of linguistics»
- •Тема 2. «Speech sounds, their aspects and functions»
- •Тема 3. «The theory of phonemes»
- •Тема 4. «Distinctive features of English sounds»
- •Тема 5. «Modification of sounds in speech»
- •Тема 6. «Suprasegmental phonemes»
- •Тема 7. «Stylistic variation in English speech»
- •Тема 8. «Standards of pronunciation in English»
Тема 4. «Distinctive features of English sounds»
The concept of distinctive and non-distinctive features
Distinctive and non-distinctive features of English consonants
The phoneme is both material and abstract. The relationship between the phoneme and
its variants is the relation between abstract and general, concrete and specific: an example of
the dialectical unity of contradiction. To build a phonemic structure of the language it is
necessary to look upon the notion of a distinctive feature, which represents the
differentiating quality. When the idea of the phoneme was new, it was felt that phonemes
were the ultimate constituents of language, the smallest element that it could be broken
down into. But later phonologists pointed out that phonemes could be broken down into
smaller constituents called features.
It is conventional to treat feature labels as being capable of having different values –
usually they are either "plus" (+) or "minus" (–). The features are the things that distinguish
each phoneme of a language from every other phoneme of that language; it follows that
there will be a minimum number of features needed to distinguish them in this way, and that
each phoneme must have a set of “+” and “–” values that is different from that of any other
phoneme. A full feature-based analysis of a sound system is a long and complex task, and
many theoretical problems arise in carrying it out. For most languages, around 12 features
are said to be sufficient. There is disagreement about how to define the features, whether
they should be labeled according to articulatory or acoustic characteristics, and about how
many features are needed in order to be able to classify the sounds of all the languages in
the world.
The phonological system of any language may be looked upon as a network of
oppositions where phonemes are looked upon as the points of reference in this network.
This view was taken by Ch. Hockett, who defined the phonological system of the language
as a network of differences between the sounds. In this functional frame of reference, the
elements of this system cannot be defined positively but only negatively in terms of what
they are not or what they contrast with. The phoneme is identified only through stating its
differences from other similar units – distinctive features. Distinctive features of English
sounds are identified through the test of contrastive and non-contrastive distribution
(correlation). Those tests reveal that some features of consonantal sounds are neutralized.
Those features are considered non-distinctive.
Such neutralization of phonological oppositions is exposed in the opposition of the
voiced and voiceless consonants: /ë/ and /ò/ in the intervocalic position are not distinguished
as different phonemes. E.g., in the words like “evasive, conclusive” more than a 100 out of
241 speakers pronounced this sound as [ò]. The same test shows that the role of passive
organs of speech is not a distinctive feature either: E.g., team – eighth – tree. Sound [í]
stands the test of the complementary distribution.
Thus we may distinguish distinctive and non-distinctive features of English
consonants. Neutralized oppositions are formed by the following feature: presence/ absence
of voice in the production of the sound. Permanent oppositions are formed by the following
distinctive features of English consonants:
1) Manner of production, which includes articulatory features produced by the type of
obstruction to the air stream and the way the obstruction is overcome by the air stream. 26
According to this criterion consonants are grouped into occlusives (stops), constrictive
(spirants), affricates, rolling consonants.
Occlusives (stops) are consonants in the production of which the air stream meets a
complete obstruction in the mouth. The breath is completely stopped at some point of
articulation and then it may be released with a slight explosion. Occlusives (stops) are
divided into plosives /é, í, â, Ö/ and occlusive sonorants /ã, å, k/.
In the production of constrictives (spirants) the air stream meets an incomplete
obstruction so the air passage is constricted and the air produces noise as it escapes with
friction. Constrictives (spirants) are divided into fricatives /ë, w, Ñ/ and constrictive
sonorants (liquids) /ï, à, ä, ê/.
When affricates (occlusive-constrictive consonants) are produced a complete
obstruction is slowly released and the airstream escapes through the passage with some
friction /`, d/.
Rolling consonants do not exist in English.
2) Articulatory features produced by work of active organs of speech, such as lips and
tongue. According to the work of the lips the consonants are divided into labiodental
consonants – when the upper teeth and the lower lip take part in the production of the sound
/Ñ, î/, bilabial consonants – when both lips take part in the production of the sound /ã, é/.
According to the work of the tongue and its position in relation to the teeth consonants
are described as interdental consonants – the tongue takes the position between the teeth, /q,
a/, alveolar consonants – the tongue is positioned on the alveolars behind the teeth /í, p, w/,
post-alveolar consonants – the tip of the tongue is placed just behind the alveolars /ê/,
palato-alveolars – the tip of the tongue is placed against the alveoli and the front of the
tongue is raised towards the hard palate /`, d/.
According to the work of the tongue and the part of the tongue that takes part in
production of the sound consonants are divided into forelingual (apical) consonants – the tip
of the tongue is active /å, Ç, `/, palatal (mediolingual) – the middle part of the tongue is
moved in the mouth cavity /à/, back-lingual (velar) – the back of the tongue is active in the
mouth cavity /Ö, â, k/.
There is a glottal consonant which is articulated in the glottis that does not exist in
Russian – /Ü/.
3) The amount of muscular tension and energy involved in the production of the sound.
The consonants are classified as fortis, requiring more muscular tension and energy in the
production of the sound; and lenis, requiring less muscular tension and energy in the
production of the sound. All voiceless consonants are pronounced with greater force than
the voiced consonants. E.g., cap (fortis) – cab (lenis). Though, in the intervocalic position
this opposition can be still partially neutralized. It happens in the American variant of the
English language, in words like ‘letter, better’ when the voiceless sound /í/ is slightly
voiced.
4) The work of the resonator (the functioning resonance chamber). The consonants are
divided into orals, articulated in the oral cavity /ë, Ñ, ä/ and nasals, the airstream passes
through the nasal cavity /å, k, ã/.
Distinctive and non-distinctive features of English vowels
Phoneticians have always needed to classify vowels independently of the vowel system
of a particular language. With consonants it is easy to observe how their articulation is
organized, and to specify the place and manner of the constriction formed; vowels are much
less easy to observe. Early in the 20th century, the English phonetician D. Jones worked out 27
a set of "Cardinal Vowels" that students which are learning phonetics could be taught to
make (Appendix 1). This set would serve as reference points that other vowels could be
related to. The vowels are located on a chart or four-sided figure; its exact shape has
changed from time to time. You can see it at the end of the book. Phonetic "ear-training"
makes much use of the Cardinal Vowel system, and students can learn to identify and
discriminate a very large number of different vowels in relation to the Cardinal vowels.
Neutralization of phonological oppositions is exposed in the opposition of short and
long vowels, checked and unchecked vowels, lax and tense vowels. Historically long and
short vowels are not distinguished. In the process of the development of the present-day
English short vowels were lengthened and even diphthongized whereas long vowels were
shortened. In present-day English the length of the vowels is also neutralized in certain
phonetic circumstances: the length of the long vowel is modified according to the quality of
the following consonant. Thus the length of the vowel depends on the sound environment.
This feature is variable and cannot serve as distinctive.
Checked vowels are those whose end is strong, abrupt, there is no diminishing towards
the end of phonation. Unchecked vowels are those where the energy is weakened towards
the end of the pronunciation of the sound. Though, these features cannot be considered
distinctive features of English vowels.
A lax vowel is said to be one produced with relatively little articulatory energy. A tense
vowel is articulated with relatively greater articulatory energy. American phonologists
prefer to use the terms lax and tense in describing English vowels: they class short vowels
as lax, while sounds that are usually referred to as the long vowels and the diphthongs are
considered to be tense. Since there is no established standard for measuring articulatory
energy this concept has meaning only if it is used relative to some other sounds. These
terms are equivalent of terms used for consonants: fortis and lenis. These are no considered
as distinctive features of English consonants.
The property of the vowel depends on the shape of the resonator, which can be changed
by the tongue movements on the horizontal and vertical plane, position of lips and the
stability of the position of the articulators. Permanent oppositions are formed by the
following distinctive features of English vowels:
1) Tongue movements on the vertical plane. Vowels are grouped into high (close) – the
tongue is raised high towards the palate /g, s, e/, mid – the tongue is in the middle position
/^, cW, É/ and low (open) – the tongue is positioned as low as possible in the oral cavity /ñ,
o, l, i/.
2) Tongue movement on the horizontal plane. According to the tongue advancement,
the vowels can be classified as back vowels – the tongue is positioned in the in the back part
of the mouth and its back part is raised to the soft palate /o, l, i, e/ and back-advanced –
when the tongue is in the back part of the mouth but it is slightly advanced /s/; central (mid)
– the front of the tongue is raised towards the back part of the hard palate; front vowels –
the tongue is positioned in the front part of the mouth and the front part of it is raised to the
hard palate /g, É, ñ/, and front-retracted vowels – the tongue is in the front part of the
mouth but slightly retracted /f/.
3) Lip position. The vowels are grouped into labialized (rounded) – the lips are drawn
together so that the more or less round opening is open /e, i/; and non-labialized
(unrounded) – the lips are spread or neutral /É, g/.
4) Stability of articulation lets us to distinguish monophthongs – the articulation of the
sound is stable throughout the phonation /o, i/, diphthongs – the organs move from one 28
vowel position to another within the same sound /~f, cs, lf/, diphthongoids – the organs of
speech move slightly during the phonation /g, e/.
Structural behaviour of segmental phonemes. Distribution of phonemes in speech.
Frequency of occurrence
English segmental phonemes are characterized by specific structural behaviour. These
peculiarities are conditioned by the distribution of the phonemes in speech. The distribution
of phonemes in speech characterizes the place of phonemes in a word and the frequency of
their occurrence in speech. Consonants of the same manner of production are never used
together either finally or initially. Distribution of English consonantal phonemes is
characterized by some specific traits.
1) Initial position. In the initial position of the word in the English language there may
be from 0 – 3 three consonants. Two consonants [w, k] are never used in initial positions in
words of Anglo-Saxon origin. Six consonants [`, d, w, Ü, p, k] never collocate with other
consonants in non-zero initial positions in an English word.
If the sound cluster in the initial position in a word consists of two elements, it can be
presented by the following combinations:
− a fricative + a liquid [ëï, Ñä];
− a fricative + a plosive [ëâ],
− a plosive + a liquid [Çê, âï, éä].
If the cluster consists of three elements, then the first element is always presented by
[ë], the second element of the initial sound cluster is represented by a voiceless plosive stop,
the third element is represented by the liquid [ê, ï, à], in words like “splash, strike, squat,
spew”.
2) Medium position. There are from 0 – 4 consonants in the medial position in an
English word. There are no special rules that limit combination of consonants in the medial
position.
3) Final position. There may be from 0 – 4 consonants in the final position in the word.
Sounds [ê, ï, Ü] never occur in the final position in the English word.
Among the English vowels [è] is the most frequently used one. It occurs in all
positions in unstressed syllables. Unchecked vowels occur in all positions but before [k].
The most frequently used consonantal English phoneme is forelingual (apical). This
feature refers to all Indo-European languages. There is a great disproportion in the usage of
fortis and lenis consonants: lenis phonemes are used much more frequently than the fortis
consonants. For example, statistical coefficient of usage for the sound [q] is 0,37, whereas
for the sound [a] it is equal to 3,56. This is the result of the process that took place in the
Middle English, when voicing replaced all possible devoiced positions. The same tendency
takes place in the present-day English where the voicing of the consonants happens more
often than the devoicing of the consonants.
