- •Lecture №1 theory of translation: introductory
- •II. The history of Translation
- •Lecture №2 object and objectives of translation theory
- •Lecture №3 equivalence in translation
- •Lecture №4 translating process aspects
- •Lecture №5 types of translation
- •Lecture №6 lexical problems of translation
- •1.1. Context-free words
- •1.2. Context-bound words
- •1.3. Equivalent-lacking words
- •Lecture №7 phraseological units
- •Lecture №8 aspect of scientific translation (english-arabic translation)
- •1. Introduction
- •2. Requirements of Scientific translator
- •4. Scientific Register
- •5. Scientific versus Literary Contexts
- •Lecture №9 translation of official documents
- •Infinitive
- •Inversion
- •Business letters throught lexics and grammar
- •A sampling of contract phrases
- •Foreign esoteric words
- •Some words against passive
- •Examining english business letters
- •Example 1.
- •Example2
- •Example 3.
- •Lecture X translation and style.
- •Lecture №11 basic translation devices
- •Integration
Foreign esoteric words
Every now and then a scholarly phrase becomes accepted in business usage. "Pro rate" and "pari passu" are Latin expressions but concern money. "Pro rata" proves helpful when payments are to be in a proportion reflecting earlier formulas in a contract. "Pari passu" is used when several people are paid at the same level or time out of a common fund. Latin, however, is not the only source of foreign phrases in business letters.
"Force majeure" is a French phrase meaning circumstances beyond one's control.
English itself has plenty of rare words. One example is "eschew"; how many times we see people struggling with negatives such as "and we agree not to produce (whatever it is) for a period of X". The more appropriate phrase would be
"we will eschew production".
But here it should be mentioned that not everyone can understand such phrases. Therefore rare words should be used only once in a long while. Those who uses them sparingly appears to be reliable.
Some words against passive
Until now the study of writing business letters has consisted largely of contract phrases accompanied by brief essays evaluating their usefulness. The words are only samplings and are presented mainly to conduce writing business letters in a proper way. It will be wrong, however, to bring this list to an end without mention of a more general problem that arises in connection with no fixed word pattern at all. It arises, rather from using too many passives. Such phrases as "The material will be delivered";
"The start date is to be decided";
"The figures must be approved" are obscure ones leaving unsettled who it is that delivers, who decides, and who does the approving. Which side it is to be? Lawsuits are the plausible outcome of leaving it all unsettled. Passives used in contracts can destroy the whole negotiations. "You will deliver" is better for it identifies the one who will do delivering. Certainly, "must be approved by us" violates other canons. "We shall have the right but not the obligation to approve" is less unfortunate. There is no doubt that passives do not suit business letters, and if they go all the way through without adding something like "by you" or "by us" they are intolerable. Once in a long while one may find passives used purposely to leave something unresolved. In those circumstances they will be in class with "negotiate in good faith", which I've examined earlier.
Examining english business letters
Now let's turn to the practical point of writing business letters. They may be divided into official and semi-official. The first kind of letters is characteristic of those people working in business: an executive, a department manager, a salesman, a secretary or a specialist in business and technology. But also many people may want to buy something, to accept an invitation or to congratulate somebody - this is a kind of semi-official letters. The first kind of letters may in turn be subdivided into such groups as: inquiries, offers, orders, and so on. I am going to examine this group more carefully looking at the correspondence of Chicago businessmen and English manufactures.
.
