Conclusion
This study fulfilled the gap that there were not any study on this issue with KIMEP university students. A survey was conducted online by sending message to students with link to survey. On this point there were great advantage of sites: vk.com and surveymonkey.com. The results showed that in decision making process parents are alternate in different issues differently. Men dominate in financial matters; women dominate in child upbringing and housekeeping. In another word, we can say that they are equal on many issues.
There were found KIMEP student’s dominated family structure: modern family with parents dual-workers: father dominates on earning. According to review paper and primary research results time affected not only governments’ structure and workplace, but also it affected family structure. Everything is linked and affected each other and it will be continued.
There was not enough time to find out real proper kind of KIMEP U students’ modern family structure. The one thing that should be taken into account is that it is not possible to properly formulate what respondents meant by their answers. May be, the interview should have been taken to make everything clear. It was planned at the beginning, but it need time consuming. In addition, the sample population was not in the same proportion with the whole sample. For further research these limitations should be noticed and considered.
Reference list
Bespalova, A. I., & Ikhsanova, U. K. (1984). Brak po sovetskomu pravu. Semeinoe pravo. Almaty: Mektep. 45-66.
Bolas, d. (n.D.). Feminist family law rooted in ussr Marxist Law, 1974. Retrieved on the 17th of February from http://www.Equalparenting-bc.Ca/
Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2009). Gendered or gender-neutral care politics for fathers? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624, 177-189.
Brennan, R. T., Barnett, R. C., Gareis, K. C. (2001). When she earns more than he does: A longitudinal study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1) , 168-182.
Buvinić, M., & Gupta, G. R. (1997). Female-headed households and female-maintained families: Are they worth targeting to reduce poverty in developing countries? Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(2), 259-280.
Definitions. Retrieved from definitions.uslegal.com
Dulac, G. (2005). Book Review: Families, labour and love: Family diversity in a changing world. Retrieved from http://www.sagepublications.com.
Harris, S.R. (2008). What is family diversity? Objective and interpretive approaches. Journal of Family Issues, 29(11), 1407-1425.
Joshua, E. & Aseem, P. (2013). Economic Development and Gender Equality: Is There a Gender Kuznets Curve? World Politics, 65 (1), 156-186.
Kieren, D. K., Maguire, O. T., & Hurlbut, N. (1996). A Marker Method to Test a Phasing Hypothesis in Family Problem-Solving Interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58 (2), 442-455.
Leigh, A. L. (2001). Family therapy's response to family diversity : Looking back, looking forward. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 904-921.
OrexCA. (n.d.) Kazakh family traditions. Retrieved on the 30th of January,2013 from
http://www.kazakhstan.orexca.com/kazakhstan_culture2.shtml
Ospanov, K. I. (2007). Osnovy grazhdanskogo prava. Osnovy prava. Almaty: Zheti zhargy. 88-119.
Parish, T. S. (1993). Perceived parental actions and evaluations of the family and its members. Adolescence, 28 (111), 749.