Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
реферат Ярославцева англ.docx
Скачиваний:
1
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
40 Кб
Скачать
☆

Conclusion

Social structure is an objective division of society into separate layers, groups, different in their social status, according to their relation to the mode of production. It is strong association of elements in the social system.

Among the many types of social communities of particular importance in terms of impact on behavior are such as the family, the labor collective of the joint leisure activities, as well as various social and territorial communities (village, small town, big city, region, etc.).

Stratification - income inequality, power, prestige and education, came together with the emergence of human society. Social Stratification - is the social doctrine of the structure of society.

The concept of social stratification involves the division of society into groups, strata and classes, depending on their social and economic status. Stratification occurred simultaneously with the emergence of human society. Social stratification is characterized by mobility, variability, as it depends on social mobility, ie the movement of people from one country or class to another. This is due to the fact that people tend to seek from the bottom up, rather than vice versa. Each of us wants to live better and no one - not worse. If possible, we overtaking each other, rush upstairs where more power, privilege and wealth. Of course, not all have a passion for enrichment or power, but everyone wants to live better. Some see a better life in a spiritual communion, the other - to the material.

Thus, the phenomenon of upward mobility (moving from bottom to top) is formed only where the most gracious and most people are at opposite ends of the social scale. If they are both together, no one will want to move up. Upward mobility corresponds to a phenomenon that we can call achievement motivation.

Ukraine can be attributed to a mixed type of stratification, but with a caveat. Feudal remnants were not preserved in the form of tradition. They are not laminated to the new class structure. In Ukraine, the first class system has been undermined by capitalism, and then finally destroyed by the Bolsheviks. Classes were also destroyed. Nevertheless, significant, although the modified elements of both stratification revived in this type of society, this in principle can not stand no stratification, no inequality. This is a historically new and unique type of mixed stratification.

Reference:

1. Барулин В.С. Социальная философия, М. 1999 г. – с. 342

2. Весоловский В. Классы, слои и власть, М. 1981 г. – с. 231

3. Ерёмин Ю.Е. Классы и демократия, М. 1974 г. – с. 271

4. Замогильный С.И. Эволюция теорий классов и современность, Саратов 1989 г. - с. 342

5.Кончанин Т.Л., Подопригора С.Я., Яременко С.Н. Социология: Учебное пособие.- Ростов н/Д: Феникс – 2001 г. – с. 234

6. Капитонов Э.А. Социология ХХ века. Ростов н/Д: Феникс,1996 г. – с. 453 7. Радугин А.А., Радугин К.А. Социология: курс лекций. – М.: Центр,1999 г. – с. 149

8. Радугин А.А., Радугин К.А. Социология: Курс лекций. – М.: Владос,1995 г. – с. 491

9. Социология. Учебное пособие. / Под общей ред. док. фил. наук, проф. Тадевосяна Э.В. М.: Знание, 1995г. – с. 274

10. Тощенко Ж.Т. Социология. Общий курс. – 2-е изд. – М.: Прометей, 2002 г. – c. 253