- •Lection 9. Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Cell Autonomy and Network Properties
- •Basic structure and function
- •Intracellular Mechanisms
- •Structure
- •Pacemaker Function
- •Period Determination
- •Per2::luc Imaging
- •Isolated Cells
- •Limits of Autonomy
- •Subtypes?
- •Scn coupling
- •Synapses
- •Gap Junctions
- •Role of the Core
- •Grp, nt, and gaba
- •Photoperiod
- •Partial Decoupling
- •Scn network reinforces cellular rhythmicity
- •Robustness of scn network
- •Determination of a precise period
- •Quantitative models
- •Parallels in drosophila
- •Conclusions
Period Determination
The circadian period imposed by the SCN master pacemaker is determined at the level of a single cell, as revealed by studies of mutant SCN neurons. Behavioral circadian rhythms of tau mutant hamsters have short periods, and SCN neurons from those hamsters also have short periods. Behavioral circadian rhythms of Cry2-/- mice, on the other hand, have long periods, and SCN neurons from those mice also have long periods. Similar results apply for mice and SCN neurons heterozygous for the Clock d19 mutation, which exhibit long periods. Thus, the circadian period measured at the whole-animal level reflects the intrinsic properties of circadian oscillators within individual SCN neurons; in this sense, circadian period is a cell-autonomous property.
Per2::luc Imaging
One limitation of multielectrode studies is that only a small minority of cells within a local area can be recorded, leaving open the possibility that small clusters of SCN neurons may form local coupled networks, and that these networks may be necessary for rhythmicity. This possibility was addressed by bioluminescence imaging of PER2 expression in dispersed SCN neurons. Cells were cultured from PER2::LUC knockin mice, expressing a reporter protein containing PER2 fused to firefly luciferase, to reflect both transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation. In this study, phases of cells were randomly distributed by 6-7 days after a medium change (Figure 3).
Even among cells less than 500 |j.m apart, cells that were closer together did not tend to have more similar phases or periods (17; D.K. Welsh & S.A. Kay, unpublished results). This observation rules out any measurable local coupling, and confirms that SCN neurons are indeed autonomous oscillators, in the sense that no net rhythmic input is necessary for them to oscillate.
Figure 3. A movie of circadian rhythms of PER2::LUC bioluminescence recorded from mouse SCN neurons in dispersed culture over a period of two weeks, showing that the cells oscillate independently. Bioluminescence intensity of one cell highlighted near the center of the image is plotted below.
Isolated Cells
Cells were not completely isolated in these experiments, however, so it was still possible that SCN neuron rhythms might require tonic input from other cells. This possibility was addressed in a recent study from Erik Herzog’s group, in which SCN neurons were cultured at various densities. In multielectrode array experiments, reducing cell density to ~500 cells/sq mm reduced the proportion of rhythmic cells from 61% to 33%. In addition, SCN neurons were cultured from PER2::LUC mice at very low density (100 cells/sq mm). In these cultures, only 27% of cells expressed PER2 at detectable levels for 3 days, but of these cells 65% (252/386) were rhythmic. In a few cases, a single rhythmic neuron was selected, and all other neurons in the same dish were mechanically ablated; 3 out of 5 of these isolated neurons remained rhythmic. Thus, tonic input from other cells is not absolutely required for SCN neurons to oscillate, but it does appear to increase levels of PER2 expression and the proportion of rhythmic cells.
