- •Chapter 1
- •Introduction to linear singular optics
- •I.I. Mokhun
- •Chapter 1
- •Introduction to linear singular optics
- •I.I. Mokhun
- •1.1. IntRoduction
- •1.2. Basic notions of scalar singular optics
- •1.2.1. Phase vortices
- •1.2.2. Topological charge and topological index of singular points. Elementary topological reactions
- •1.2.2.1. Topological charge
- •1.2.2.2. Topological index
- •1.2.2.3. Conservation law for topological charge
- •1.2.2.4. Elementary topological reactions
- •1.2.3. Experimental observation and identification of vortices into scalar fields
- •1.2.4. Generation of vortices using computer-generated holograms
- •1.3. Vortices and phase structure of a scalar field
- •1.3.1. Sign principle
- •1.3.2. Phase speckles. “breathing” of phase speckles
- •1.3.3. Birth of vortices
- •1.3.4. Appearance of wave front dislocations as a result of interference of waves with simple phase surfaces
- •1.3.5. Topological indices of the field of intensity. Extrema of phase and intensity. “correlation” of phase and intensity
- •1.3.6. Vortex nets. Phase skeleton of a scalar field
- •1.3.6.1. Reconstruction of the field’s phase on the basis of shifted vortex nets
- •1.3.6.2. Image reconstruction using a regular sampling found from analysis of the parameters of vortices in random field
- •1.3.6.3. Some remarks on the field reconstruction by the use of nets of the intensity sTationary points
- •1.4. Singularities of a vector field
- •1.4.1. Disclinations. Polarization singularities
- •1.4.2. Vortices of phase difference. Sign principle for a vector field
- •1.4.2.1. Field decomposition into orthogonally linearly polarized components
- •1.4.2.2. Principle of the vortex analysis of vector fields
- •1.4.2.3. Vortices of orthogonally polarized field components. Technique for study of polarizatioN singularities
- •1.4.3. “Correlation” of intensity and polariszation of the vector field
- •1.4.4. Interconnection of the component vortices and -points
- •1.4.5. Elementary polarization structures and elementary polarization singularities of vector fields
- •1.4.5.1. Polarization structures resulting from interference of orthogonally linearly polarized beams
- •1.4.5.2. Elementary polarization singularities resulting from interference of circularly polarized beams
- •1.4.5.3. Experimental mOdeling of elementary polarization singularities
- •1.4.6. Fine structure and averaged polarization characteristics of inhomogeneous vector fields
- •1.4.6.1. Avaraged stokes parameters
- •1.4.6.2. Analysis of the averaged parameters for decomposition of the field into linearly polarized components
- •1.4.6.3. Computer simulation of the vector field’s parameters
- •1.4.6.4. Analysis of the averaged parameters for the field decomposition into circular basis
- •1.4.6.5. Comparison of the experimental results and the data of computer simulation
- •1.4.7. “Stokes-formalism” for polarization singularites. “stokes-vortices”
- •1.5. Singularities of the Poynting vector and the structure of optical fields
- •1.5.1. General assumptions. Components of the poynting vector
- •1.5.2. Singularities of the poynting vector in scalar fields
- •1.5.2.1. Instantaneous singularities of a scalar field
- •1.5.2.2. Averaged singularities of the poynting vector of scalar field
- •1.5.3. Singularities of the Poynting vector at vector fields
- •1.5.3.1. Instantaneous singularities of vector field
- •1.5.3.2. Behavior of the Poynting vector in areas of elementary polarization singularities
- •1.5.3.2.1. Symmetric distributions of amplitude and phase of the interfering beams
- •1.5.3.2.2. Non-symmetrical distributions of amplitudes and phases of the interfering beams
- •1.5.3.2.3. Experimental proving of the existence of the orbital momentum in the vicinity of -point
- •1.5.3.3. The averaged Poynting vector of the vector field
- •Instantaneous singularities of the Poynting vector
- •Appendix 1.1. Wave fronts approximation
- •104. I.Mokhun, r.Brandel and Ju.Viktorovskaya, “Angular momentum of electromagnetic field in areas of polarization singularities”, ujpo, Vol. 7, pp. 63-73, (2006).
1.5.3.2. Behavior of the Poynting vector in areas of elementary polarization singularities
Let us consider the elementary polarization cell, viz. the field area containing the minimal number (one or two) of -points. Such field structures with one -point and the methods of formation of them have been considered in details in subsection 1.3.5.
Figure
1.68. Example
of formation of the elementary non-uniformly polarized area using
orthogonally circularly polarized beams.
he
structure of such cell is following.
-points
of the same or the opposite signs are in the region with one type of
elliptical polarization (clockwise or counterclockwise) bounded by
-contour
of relatively simple form. Similarly to the field with one
-point,
the field with two
-points
can be formed by superposition of the vortex circularly polarized
beam and orthogonally polarized beam with a smooth wave front. It can
be shown that superposition of circularly polarized beams results in
closed by
-contour
of limited size. The example of formation of the elementary
non-uniform in polarization cell of the field is illustrated in
Figure 1.68.
Further consideration presumes that the indices of -points, as well as the phase distribution and the intensity distribution into interfering beams can change arbitrarily.
1.5.3.2.1. Symmetric distributions of amplitude and phase of the interfering beams
а. Single -point
Assume the vortex beam to be circularly polarized isotropic vortex:
, (1.163)
and the plane wave to be orthogonally circularly polarized:
,
(1.164)
where
is the handedness factor,
and
are the polar coordinates,
are the Cartesian coordinates with the origin at the center of the
vortex, and
is the topological charge of the vortex. Correspondingly, the complex
amplitudes of the resulting field are of the form:
,
(1.165)
- and -components of the field are described in terms of strength by the following relations:
,
(1.166)
where:
,
(1.167)
and
.
(1.168)
In accordance with Eqs. (1.153)-(1.155) one finds:
.
(1.169)
Thus, one obtains for the - and -components of the Poynting vector:
.
(1.170)
As a consequence, the modulus of the transversal component of the Poynting vector takes the form:
,
(1.171)
where
is the topological charge of the vibration phase in the vicinity of
point.
One can see
from Eq. (1.171) that the modulus of the transversal component of the
Poynting vector identically equals zero,
,
over the whole analyzed area, if the signs of
and
are the same. It means physically that the angular momentum in the
vicinity of such
-point
equals zero also. In other words, the orbital momentum is compensated
by the spin momentum. Hereinafter, we assume that
and
are of opposite signs:
. (1.172)
In this
case, the modulus of the transversal component behaves similarly to
the longitudinal one being rotating in time around
-point
with the double frequency of oscillation [102-104]. The direction of
rotation of the minimum (maximum) is determined by the sign of the
topological charge of the vibration phase. Minimum
is reached at
-contour
and corresponds to the position of the Nye’s disclination. For the
specified distribution of complex amplitudes, cf. Eqs. (1.163) and
(1.164),
-contour
is a circle with the center at
-point.
Figure 1.69 illustrates temporal behavior of the modulus of the
transversal component.
Figure 1.69. Rotation of the minimum of the transversal component of the Poynting vector (disclination) around -point. Position of disclination at -contour is indicated by a white spot.
Naturally,
if the structure of the interference beams is more complicated, i.e.
the vector field in the vicinity of
-point
can not be represented as a superposition of an isotropic vortex with
a plane wave, the field in the vicinity of
-point
is modified, and Eq. (1.171) is not valid. Nevertheless, the
character of changes of
is similar.
b. Angular momentum of the field into vicinity of С-point
By definition, the density of the angular momentum is represented by the relation:
.
(1.173)
Then, taking into account Eq. (1.170), one obtains:
.
(1.174)
The
averaged in time (over one period of oscillation
)
angular momentum of the field within the area
is of the form:
.
(1.175)
In the end, one obtains:
.
(1.176)
where
is a power of the vortex beam.
To compare
the obtained relation with the momentum of the vortex (
[95]), note that the power of circularly polarized vortex as the beam
forming a non-uniform in polarization cell with
-point
is twice larger than
.
Taking into account this circumstance, one obtains for the normalized
powers the following relation:
.
(1.177)
Thus, the
angular momentum in the vicinity of
-point
is twice larger than for the vortex beam, if
and
are of the opposite signs (spin and orbital angular momenta of the
field are added), and equals zero, if
and
are of the same signs (spin and orbital momenta of the field
compensate to each other).
a b c d
Figure 1.70. Temporal behavior of the transversal component of the Poynting vector in the vicinity of -point for non-coinciding signs of the topological charge and the handedness factor. Azimuth of the component corresponds to orientation of the arrows. Arrow length corresponds to the magnitude of the modulus of the component.
F
igure
1.70 illustrates the distribution both the modulus and the azimuth of
the instantaneous transversal component of the Poynting vector. The
azimuth of the component corresponds to the orientation of arrows,
and its magnitude is characterized by the arrow length. One can see
from this figure that the instantaneous singularity of the
transversal component of the Poynting vector corresponding to
disclination is the defect of vortex kind with positive chirality (
,
the direction of vector circulation is clockwise).
F
Figure
1.71.Behavior
of the transversal component for various instants in points of on
one of diameters of
-contour.
B
Figure
1.72. Distribution
of
the
modulus
and
the azimuth of the averaged transversal component of the Poynting
vector
c. Elementary polarization cells with two -points of the same signs
The
phase map of a circularly polarized beam with two vortices of the
same signs is represented in Figure 1.73. The position of
-contour
resulting from a superposition of this beam with the orthogonally
polarized plane wave is also shown in this figure.
Figure
1.73. Phase
map of the vortex beam. The levels of grey correspond to different
magnitudes of a phase. Position of
-contour
of the resulting field is indicated by a white line.
Two vortex singularities move along -contour in one direction, cf. Figure 1.74. Additional passive singularity kind of a saddle with the negative Poincare index arises at the geometrical center of this area. This singularity provides the topological connection between the same positive vortex singularities.
a b c d
Figure 1.74. Behavior of the instantaneous Poynting vector for the field containing two -points of the same signs.
a b
Figure
1.75. Behavior
of the averaged Poynting vector for the area of the field containing
two
C-points:
(a)
two C-points
are spatially separated;
(b)
distance between C-points
if negligible
ehavior
of the averaged Poynting vector is illustrated in Figure 1.75a, from
which one can see that the character of distribution of the
transversal component does not differ considerably from the case of
one
-point.
Difference between
behaviors of the normalized parameters becomes negligible, when the
distance between
-points
is very small, cf. Figure 1.75b. One must remember that the magnitude
of the angular momentum of the field within the area with two
close
-points
is twice larger than in the case of the area containing only one
-point.
Besides, behavior of the instantaneous Poynting vector
a b c d
Figure 1.76. Distribution of the parameters of the instantaneous Poynting vector for the field containing two closely positioned -points of the same signs.
is absolutely different from the behavior of this characteristic of the field in the area with one -point, cf. 1.76.
d. Elementary polarization cells with two -points of opposite signs
Figure
1.77
The
phase map of a circularly polarized beam with two vortices of the
opposite signs is shown in Figure 1.77. The vortices are located at
the same distance as for the field containing two identical
-points.
The position of
-contour
resulting from a superposition of this beam with the orthogonally
polarized plane wave is also shown in this figure. One can see that
the positions of
-contour
is the same as for the area containing
-points
of the same signs.
Similarly to the previous case, two singularities of the Poynting vector associated with disclinations appear at -contour (Figure 1.78). However, one of them is the vortex one (it is shown on the left of Figure 1.78(b)), and another is passive, i.e. negative (it is shown on the right of Figure 1.78(b)). These singularities move along -contour in opposite directions. It follows from Figure 1.78 that moving of these singularities results in their annihilation, cf. Figure 1.78(c), and appear again, cf. Figure 1.78(a). Behavior of the azimuth of the transversal component of the Poynting vector for both situations is characterized by the absence of any defects inside -contour.
a b c d
Figure 1.78. Behavior of the instantaneous Poynting vector for the field containing two C-points of the opposite signs.
Figure
1.79. Distributions
of the parameters of the averaged Poynting vector for the field
containing two
C-points
of the opposite signs. The length of arrows corresponds to the
magnitude of the transversal component of the vector.
Changing
the azimuth as a function of the parameter of
-contour
does not undergo discontinuity along the contour, similarly to the
case when disclinations at
-contour
are absent, cf. 1.78(d). At the same time, the modulus of the
transversal component of the Poynting
Behavior of
the parameters of the averaged Poynting vector is represented in
Figure 1.79. It follows from this figure that the vortex singularity
is localized in the position of
-point,
for which
(left
-point),
and the modulus of the transversal component of the Poynting vector
vanishes at
-point,
for which the sign of the topological charge is the same as the sign
of the handedness factor (right
-point).
