- •Міністерство освіти і науки України
- •Передмова
- •Male couch potato international phenomenon
- •Exaggeration, to exaggerate - [I g z X g q r e I s q n] – перебільшення, перебільшувати
- •Childless and free
- •Loneliness
- •Swamp – [ s w p m p ] - болото
- •In pairs discuss whether the following superstitions make sense or not
- •The mayden voyage of the titanic.
- •Career education
- •Comprehension
- •The “mary celeste”
- •What do you think happened?
- •What about the lifeboat?
- •Internal political reasons
- •Intellectual reasons
- •Ignorance – [ I g n q r q n s ]
- •Is aggression necessary?
- •Discussion
- •Discussion
- •We should cherish our children's freedom to think Pre-reading task 1. In what ways do you expect western forms and methods of education are different from those in Ukraine?
- •2. Do you agree that discipline in classes can improve only at the expense of children’s creativity and vice versa?
- •I want to break free.
- •2 Why was the writer's heart pounding as she set off for work?
- •7 How do the Year 10 English class react to the writer's entry into the room?
- •Set phrases and cliché Expressing an opinion
- •It is very common to start with the subject clause
- •Agreeing and disagreeing
- •Disagreeing
- •In formal situations
- •Use linking words and phrases
- •Some more useful phrases
In pairs discuss whether the following superstitions make sense or not
A person who is sitting at the corner of the table is not going to get married.
If you wear a jacket or something and sew the button on to this jacket you run the risk of losing your memory.
If you break a mirror you will have bad luck.
If a knife or fork falls down on the floor you will have guests. If it is a knife a man will come, if it’s a fork, a woman will come.
LIFE IN SPACE
Pre-reading task
When did space exploration begin? Who was the first man to fly into space? The first man to step onto the Moon?
To what extent do you think science fiction movies and novels predict the future?
We haven't conquered space. Not yet. We have sent some 20 men on camping trips to the Moon, and the USA and the Soviet Union have sent people to spend restricted lives orbiting the Earth. During the next few weeks, for Instance, the U5 Space Shuttle will take Spacelab into orbit, showing that ordinary (non-astronaut) scientists can live and work in space - for a few days only. All these are marvellous technical and human achievements, but none of them involves living independently in space. The Russians need food and even oxygen sent up from Earth. And they haven't gone far into space. The residents of Sheffield are farther from London than those of the Shuttle or the Soviet's Salyut. It is only in fiction, and in space movies, that people spend long periods living more or less normally deep in space. But in a couple of decades - by the year 2000, say - this could have changed. There could be settlements in space that would house adventurers leading more or less normal lives. It seems like science fiction - but It is not. It is based on plans produced by hard-headed people: engineers and scientists, headed by Qerard O'Neill of Princeton University, summoned to a conference by NASA. They are space enthusiasts, of course, but they are not dreamers. The settlement is a gigantic wheel, a tube more than 400ft in diameter bent into a ring just over a mile across. The wheel spins gently once a minute. It is this gentle rotation that makes this settlement different from the Shuttle and Salyut, and infinitely different from the Lunar modules that took man for the first time to any non-terrestrial soil, because the spin produces a force that feels like gravity. Every space trip has shown that the human body needs gravity if it isn't to deteriorate, and gravity also makes normal activities possible. Nobody would want to live for long in a space settlement where everything - people and equipment and the eggs they were trying to fry – moved weightlessly around. With gravity, life in space can be based on our experience on Earth. We can have farming and factories and houses and meeting-places that are not designed by guesswork. The need for gravity is one of the reasons for building a space colony, rather than sending settlers to an existing location such as the Moon or the planets. The Moon is inhospitable. Its gravity is tiny – and any one place on the Moon has 14 days of sunlight followed by 14 of night, which makes agriculture impossible and means there is no using solar energy. In the settlement, which floats in permanent sunlight, the day-length is controlled. A gigantic mirror about a mile in diameter floats weightlessly above the ring of the settlement. It reflects sunlight on to smaller mirrors that direct it into the ring, through shutters that fix the day length. The sunlight is constant during the 'daytime', so farming is productive to an extent which can be reached on Earth only occasionally. The aim is to provide a diet similar to that on Earth, but with less fresh meat. The farms will be arranged in terraces with fish ponds and rice paddies in transparent tanks on the top layer; wheat below; vegetables, soya, and maize below that. The population of the settlement is fixed at about 10,000 people: farm output can be accurately planned. Research reports suggest that about 44 square metres of vegetables will be needed for each person, and just over five square metres of pastures. Those who intend to settle in space have formed an L5 Society. The members are not all impractical eccentrics: that is, they are not all impractical.
marvellous - чудовий
to summon - викликати
to spin - обертатися
non-terrestrial - неземний
rotation - обертання
to deteriorate - псуватися
inhospitable - негостинний
solar energy – сонячна енергія
rice paddy – рисове поле
What do you think?
The article does not say what would occupy people’s time in space. What do you think they could do?
No reasons are given why there should be settlements in space. What reasons can you think of?
Does the article make living in space sound attractive? What would appeal to you?
Do you think the expense of such programmes is justified?
