- •Lecture 4 environmental performance indices and metrics (Measures of environmental performance)
- •An environmental evaluation matrix
- •Dimensional and dimensionless environmental metrics
- •The “master environmental equation”
- •Figure 2 - Growth in Global Population by Geographic Area
- •Generation of wastes per unit of production
- •Material intensity per service unit and ecological rucksacks
- •Multi-point models
- •Other useful metrics
- •Ecological footprints
- •Resources
- •Figure 3
- •Damage to human health
- •Ecosystem quality
- •Normalisation
Generation of wastes per unit of production
Wernick and Ausubel (1995) estimated the amount of wastes generated annually in the U.S. as the result of fossil fuel and mineral production. Table 4 shows these estimates as tons per year and also as the ratio of tons of waste per ton of material produced. It can be seen that from up to 12 tons of material must be moved aside to produce one ton of fuel, mineral or metal production.
Table 4. Mining and mineral concentration wastes generated per unit of production
|
Million tons of wastes |
Million tons of production |
tons of waste per ton produced |
Coal, surface mining Coal, cleaning |
10042 84 |
843 |
12.0 |
Oil & gas produced wastes Oil & gas drilling fluids |
3318 57.2 |
1044.7 |
3.2 |
Ore wastes in metal mining “Tailings” from ore concentration |
755 409 |
111.6 |
10.4 |
Ore wastes in phosphate mining “Tailings” from ore concentration |
262 108 |
39.9 |
9.3 |
Fraction of global production used by a nation
A metric that can be of importance in trans-national discussions of emission rights, etc., is the fraction of global production of a specific material that is used by a particular nation. It should be understood that this use encompasses both internal consumption and also export trade. Therefore, large industrial nations are using a fraction of that is disproportionately high to their fraction of the world’s population. For example, Table 5 shows the 1990 global production of various materials and the respective amounts produced/imported and used/exported by the U.S. economy. It can be seen that the U.S., with about 4.5% of the world’s population, used from 6.5% to 31.9% of the global production of various materials.
Table 5
Fraction of global production of materials used by the U.S. economy (1990, ref.)
Material |
Global production, million tons |
Use by U.S. economy, million tons |
U.S. fraction, |
Plastics |
78.3 |
25 |
31.9% |
Synthetic ffiber |
13.2 |
3.9 |
29.5% |
Aluminum |
17.8 |
5.3 |
29.8% |
Phosphate |
15.7 |
4.4 |
28.0% |
Copper (new metal) |
8.8 |
2.2 |
25.0% |
Salt |
202.3 |
40.6 |
20.1% |
Potash |
28.3 |
5.5 |
19.4% |
Sand, gravel |
133.1 |
24.8 |
18.6% |
Iron and steel |
593.7 |
99.9 |
16.8% |
Nitrogen |
107.9 |
18 |
16.7% |
Cement |
1251.1 |
81.3 |
6.5% |
Material intensity per service unit and ecological rucksacks
In an attempt to move beyond simple energy analysis with the inclusion of materials and transformations in the environment, the Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment and Energy in Germany developed the concept of 'ecological rucksacks' or MIPS (material intensity per unit of service) (see Schmidt-Bleek 1998). MIPS measures the total material inputs and transformations that result from products. It overcomes some of the issues of embodied energy by accounting for all materials movements (not just those with energy contents) although it does not discriminate very well between different materials consumed or transformed.
