- •On the Principles of Permissible Overunity em Power Systems
- •28 July 2001 Abstract and Summary:
- •Introduction Beginning with Magnetics Kinetic Magnets: Self-Oscillation in Magnetic Materials
- •The Researcher Must Be Aware Of Numerous Magnetic Effects { [6] }
- •A Caution on the Rare Production of Higher Polarization em Energy
- •A Heat Pump Can In Theory Be Close-Looped
- •Overunity Systems Are Already Known
- •Gabriel Kron's Negative Resistor
- •Other Overunity Systems Lawandy's Processes and Lasing Without Population Inversion
- •Self-Powering Russian Overunity Parametric Oscillator Power Systems
- •Chung's Negative Resistor Chung's Negative Resistor
- •The Seiko Kinetic Wrist Watch
- •Miscellaneous em Overunity Power Systems
- •The Mead-Nachamkin Zero Point Energy Converter
- •Open Systems Far from Thermodynamic Equilibrium
- •Energy Conservation and Its Relation to Work Obtainable
- •A Surprising Thing About Thermodynamics and Reservoirs
- •The "Final Word" On the Conservation of Energy Law
- •Seemingly Random Behavior Can Be Adaptively Controlled
- •The Unresolved Problem of the Source Charge and Its Field Energy
- •The Marvelous "Source Dipole" Overunity Power System
- •Perpetual Motion Debunkers Begrudgingly Recognize Overunity Systems
- •Generators and Batteries Do Not Output Energy to the External Circuit
- •Lorentz Arbitrarily Discarded All Overunity Maxwellian Systems
- •The Effect of Lorentz's closed Surface Integration of the em Energy Flow Vector
- •There Is No Energy Problem, Just an Energy Intercepting and Using Problem
- •How em Power Systems Enforce Symmetrical Self-Regauging
- •We Pay the Power Company for a Sumo-Wrestling Match Inside Its Generators
- •What Lorentz Symmetrical Regauging Technically Is and Does
- •For Overunity Systems, One Must First Undo the Lorentz Condition
- •Hope for the Future: Poor but Growing
- •Some of the Flaws in Foundations of Electrodynamics
- •In Summary
- •Notes and References
- •Help support Tom Bearden's work
There Is No Energy Problem, Just an Energy Intercepting and Using Problem
But back to our generator or battery. Once the source dipole converter is formed, the energy flow along the circuit, powering the electrons, is for free. The energy is already freely extracted (actually gushing in a torrent) directly from the vacuum. We have never built anything but an electrical power system driven by electrical real EM energy flow extracted from the vacuum!
Yet following Lorentz, and considering an EM power system theory from which the active vacuum is excluded, most scientists continue to believe that it's terribly difficult if not impossible to extract electrical energy from the vacuum. What a colossal joke! None of our electrical power systems ever did anything else but extract and convert all the energy furnished to the external circuit, directly from the vacuum. And they actually extract and convert a great deal more EM energy that misses the circuit and is wasted. All we have ever built is an inherently free energy, overunity power system (if one accounts just the energy conversion process that is ongoing between the system and the other two components of the supersystem), once we paid to form the source dipole converter in the generator or battery. It is just that we have crippled every one of the myriad of free energy power systems we have ever built!
See Figure 22. Here's how "difficult" it is to build a free energy flow generator. Take a charged capacitor. Lay it across a permanent magnet so that the "static" E-field of the capacitor is at right angles to the "static" H field of the magnet. That maximizes the generator's available EM energy flow, which is a dynamic flow expressed as S = k(E´H) by orthodox theory. That silly thing sits there and pours out energy indefinitely { [62] , [63] , [64] }. Substitute an electret for the capacitor, and you don't even have to recharge it. That's a certified free energy generator. The only problem is in how to capture the steadily flowing energy and use it { [65] }.
There is no energy problem per se! One can get all the EM energy one wishes, anywhere in the universe, directly from the vacuum's interaction with a source dipole, easily and simply. Just make a little dipole and pay peanuts for it. And have a developed technology that can catch a great deal of the resulting energy flow and use it effectively, without destroying that dipole.
The problem is only in how to (1) intercept and use an appreciable or useful bit of the free energy flow so easily gated from the active vacuum, and (2) dissipate the captured energy in loads (and some system losses) without using half of it to destroy the source dipole, as all our present circuits and power systems are designed to do.
There are two other associated problems: (3) the continuing advocating of a seriously flawed energy flow theory and electrical power system theory, and (4) the influence of very large international energy cartels with deeply vested economic commitment to the present course of power system research, development, and engineering. Still another related problem is (5) the resulting intense economic control of science and of energy research and policy, constraining it into "accepted" directions. In short, "thinking out of the box"—the present buzzword for highly innovative thinking— is almost ruthlessly excluded in the field of EM power system theory and technology.