- •Vocabulary task 1
- •Vocabulary task 2
- •Information search
- •How to search
- •Vocabulary task 1
- •Vocabulary task 2
- •Vocabulary task 3
- •Evaluating Sources
- •Vocabulary task 2
- •Vocabulary task 3
- •Giving a Good Scientific Presentation
- •Vocabulary task 1
- •Vocabulary task 4
- •Developing the content of your presentation
- •16 And below - Bad
- •Vocabulary task 1
- •Vocabulary task 2
- •Vocabulary task 3
- •Discussion skills. Academic style.
How to search
Keyword searches is one of the most powerful ways of retrieving information. First, however, we will explore a couple of other ways of searching.
Author/title searches
Searching
by author and/or title obviously assumes that you are searching for a
particular author or book or article title, probably in either a
database. Obviously particular search engines will vary, but the
following are some general guidelines:
When searching by author, put the author’s last name first i.e. Kotler, Philip, not Philip Kotler
When searching by title, it helps if you enter the title as correctly as possible.
If searching for an organization, give the full name of the organization as it commonly appears, e.g. World Bank.
Snowball search
This is a good way of searching if your topic has a key work or author. Look in that work for the key people on whom that author draws, making a preliminary bibliography from that. Do the same for each of the subsequent authors.
Keyword searches
Keywords are a way of searching through subject/topic. Most library catalogues and databases will include an option to search by keyword and an alternative to author and title. Searching by keyword can be very effective, providing you select terms that accurately describe what you are looking for, and ones that are likely to have been picked by other writers on the subject. In fact, part of the reason why keywords are effective is because writers often pick out their own keywords to describe an article, which means that they come up more easily in a search. Some search tools understand natural language, and automatically try and find as many of your words as possible, but not necessarily in useful relationship to one another.
One way of making your search more specific is by using operators from Boolean logic. This way, you can use terms such as AND, OR, NOT, as well as punctuation such as “ “, ( ), to link words together and make ‘search strings’.
Wildcards
Ways of dealing with different spellings: for example, analyse/analyze can be dealt with by placing a ? or * in the place of the ‘s’/’z’.
Truncations
This allows you to search all the variants of a word by putting a * after its stem. It can be useful in dealing with verbal forms of nouns e.g. analys* for analyse/analysis, but take care that you don’t select a root which also applies to many other words. For example, archiv* for archival/archive research would also yield results that relate to archives generally.
Two final points about using keyword searches in individual databases, library catalogues and search engines: individual databases will have different rules about syntax, operators etc. and you are advised to look at their help pages for guidance. Some databases and search engines structure their search mechanisms around Boolean searching, as for example the ‘Advanced search’ option of Google, or that in Emerald’s Fulltext, which allows you to search a phrase (otherwise “ “) or use and/or etc.
Practical task
Make up a 3-minute report on one of the topics:
Effective
methods of WebSearchDatabases for scientists
Reference management software
Research networks as the sources of information (Google Scholar, Research Gates etc.)
Use the information of the Unit and additional web sources. Share your ideas with the group mates.
Unit 2. Summarizing and evaluating academic sources
Warm-up activity
Discuss in groups of four
Do you take all the information for granted?
How do you evaluate information?
How do you decide whether the information is accurate?
Have you ever evaluated any academic paper? If yes, tell us in details.
What problems do we face while evaluating any scientific resource or article?
What should we do in order to decide whether it is appropriate to refer to or not?
How do you understand the phenomenon ‘plagiarism’?
Active vocabulary
Learn the active vocabulary of the lesson
№ |
English |
Russian |
1 |
academic, scholarly |
научный, университетский, академический, |
2 |
access to journal (periodical) titles |
доступ к периодическим изданиям |
3 |
to acknowledge |
признавать, допускать, подтверждать |
4 |
to apply evaluation measures |
использовать средства оценки (информации) |
5 |
to assume a high level |
воспринять, понять, принять высокий уровень чего-либо |
6 |
avenue of the research |
способ исследования |
7 |
to be overwhelmed with smth |
быть переполненным чем-то |
8 |
bedrock of the discipline |
основные принципы, факты предмета |
9 |
books of edited readings |
хрестоматии |
10 |
carry little weight |
играть незначительную роль |
11 |
clues to search for smth |
подсказки, информация по поиску чего-либо |
12 |
credibility |
надежность, эффективность, достоверность |
13 |
critical judgement |
осмысленное суждение |
14 |
customary navigation aid |
широко используемое средство поиска |
15 |
evaluate |
оценивать |
16 |
full text article |
полнотекстовая статья |
17 |
academic audience |
ученые, преподаватели |
18 |
handful |
небольшое количество, группа |
19 |
mind mapping |
ментальные карты |
20 |
panel of peers |
экспертная комиссия |
21 |
peer reviewed, refereed |
реферируемый |
22 |
relevant |
релевантный, соответствующей (тематике) |
23 |
reliability of the information |
надежность информации |
24 |
rigor |
строгость, соответствие |
25 |
scope |
содержание, объем |
26 |
to sift |
тщательно рассмотреть (факты), анализировать |
27 |
to summarize |
резюмировать, подводить итог |
28 |
table of contents |
содержание, оглавление |
29 |
to take notes |
учитывать, записывать, делать записи |
30 |
transgression |
ошибка, проступок |
31 |
validity |
обоснованность, верность, надежность |
32 |
vested professional interest |
персональный, собственный интерес |
33 |
worthy contribution to smth |
существенный вклад во что-то |
