- •Module 2 old english historical background. Old english phonetics
- •Periods in the history of English
- •2. Old English historical background
- •3. The dialects in Old English
- •4. Old English alphabet and pronunciation
- •Old English Alphabet
- •5.3. Basic phonetic changes in Old English
- •5.3.1. Changes of vowels
- •5. Old English phonetics
- •5.1. Word stress
- •5.2. The system of Old English sounds
- •Splitting of [a] and [a:] in Early Old English
- •5.3.1.2. Development of Diphthongs
- •Old English Reflexes of Proto-Germanic Diphthongs
- •5.3.1.3. Oe breaking (fracture)
- •5.3.1.4. Palatalization
- •5.3.1.5. Mutation, or Umlaut
- •Palatal mutation
- •5.3.2. Consonant changes in oe
- •5.3.2.1. West Germanic gemination of consonants
- •5.3.2.2. Loss of Consonants in Some Positions
- •Old English consonant system
- •Table 2.4 Old English Consonants
- •6. Conclusions: Phonological status of oe sounds
- •I. Phonemics of oe consonants
- •II. Phonemics of oe vowels
5.3.2. Consonant changes in oe
5.3.2.1. West Germanic gemination of consonants
In all WG languages most consonants were lengthened after a short vowel before [j]. This process is known as WG “gemination” or “doubling” of consonants, as the resulting long consonants are indicated by means of double letters, e.g.: *fuljan > OE fyllan ‘fill’; *sætjan > OE settan ‘set’, cf. Gt satjan.
The change did not affect the sonorant [r], e.g. OE werian ‘wear’; nor did it operate if the consonant was preceded by a long vowel, e.g. OE dēman, mētan ‘deem’, ‘meet’ – the earlier forms of these words contained [j], which had caused palatal mutation but had not led to the lengthening of consonants (the reconstruction of pre-written forms *mōtjan and *dōmjan is confirmed by OS motian and Goth domjan).
5.3.2.2. Loss of Consonants in Some Positions
Comparison with other OG languages, especially Gothic and O Icel, has revealed certain instances of the loss of consonants in WG and Early OE.
Nasal sonorants were regularly lost before fricative consonants; in the process the preceding vowel was probably nasalised and lengthened. Cf.: Gt fimf, O Icel fim, OHG fimf – OE fif ‘five’, Gt uns, OHG uns – OE ūs ‘us’.
Fricative consonants could be dropped between vowels and before some plosive consonants; these losses were accompanied by a compensatory lengthening of the preceding vowel or the fusion of the preceding and succeeding vowel into a diphthong, cf. OE sēon, which corresponds to Goth saihwan, OE slēan “slay”, Goth slahan, G. schlagen, OE sæde and sæ:de ‘said’.
We should also mention the loss of semi-vowels and consonants in unstressed final syllables. [j] was regularly dropped in suffixes after producing various changes in the root: palatal mutation of vowels, lengthening of consonants after short vowels. The loss of [w] is seen in some case forms of nouns : Nom. trēo, Dat. trēowe “tree”; Nom. sǽ, Dat. sǽwe “sea”, cf. Goth triwa, saiws.
Old English consonant system
Table 2.4 shows the system of OE consonants in the 9th and 10th c.
Table 2.4 Old English Consonants
|
Manner of articulation |
Labial, labio-dental |
Fore-lingual (dental) |
Medio-lingual (palatal) |
Back lingual (velar) |
|
|
Noise consonants |
plosive voiceless voiced |
p p: b b: |
t t: d d: |
k’ k’: g’: |
k k: g g: |
|
fricative voiceless voiced |
f f: v |
: s s: ð z |
x’ x’: γ’ (j) |
x x: (h) γ |
|
|
Sonorants |
m m: w |
n n: r l |
j |
(η) |
|
The system consisted of several correlated sets of consonants. All the consonants fell into noise consonants and sonorants. The noise consonants were subdivided into plosives and fricatives; plosives were further differentiated as voiced and voiceless; in this set, however, sonority was merely a phonetic difference between allophones. Cf. OE pin – bin, where the difference in sonority is phonemically relevant, and OE hlāf [f] – hlāford [v], where the difference is positional: the consonant is voiced intervocally and voiceless finally (incidentally, voiced and voiceless fricatives were not distinguished in OE spelling).

Place
of articulation