Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Cross_cultural psychology Kazakhstan A.docx
Скачиваний:
3
Добавлен:
01.05.2025
Размер:
502 Кб
Скачать
☆

3.4 Culture matters!

The evolutionary basis of higher cognitive processes does not exclude a role for the cultural shaping of personality. Although the structure of personality traits may be universal, the expression may well depend on socialization and cultural emphasis (Roberts, Caspi, & Moffitt, 2003). Therefore it is necessary to make a distinction between the origin of personality as a biological based adaptation to the environment, and the specific effects of culture that produce varying emphases and functional advantages of certain traits. Pervin (1989) proposed a hierarchical model with personality based behavior producing motivation that is universal at the first stage such as responding to the need for safety. These evolved personality based motive dispositions are in turn the basis for personal strivings, related to personal concerns and projects, and most basically to specific responses or action units. For example, motivation that evolved for intimacy leads a person to seek a relationship with a specific person, that desire leads to practical goals of arranging for dates and meetings or improving appearance, these practical steps in turn lead to specific actions like obtaining phone numbers and dieting.

The universality of traits does not in any way reduce the significance of either culture or individual variability that is the outcome of specific environments and individual strivings. Culture makes specific statements about the value of different dispositions. In Japanese society the cultural emphasis on courtesy or the spirit of the samurai produce different personality outcomes than the informality of relationships in the West. The development of specific characteristics and adaptations to the physical or social environment depend therefore largely on the cultural heritage as passed through generations. The very meaning of behavior is culturally dependent, and the specific actions that a person engages in, in pursuit of universal affective goals will depend on that cultural meaning.

A very interesting study on the interaction of biology with culture was reported by Caspari (2011). This study estimated the age of populations from the Paleolithic period by examining fossil teeth. The results showed that nearly everyone died very young in early human populations allowing little time for grandparents to emerge and teach fundamental cultural skills. However, adult survivorship soared late among upper Paleolithic Europeans, a finding not explained by biology. For example even though these populations groups lived under very harsh conditions the older to young ratio increased more than double that of the middle Paleolithic humans. Caspari argues that this was produced by the interaction of grandparents living long enough to transmit cultural knowledge, and by increasing survival rates humans were able to increase the diversity and usefulness of cultural tools and symbols. Longevity fostered intergenerational accumulation and transfer of vital information, and the social networks that in turn contributed further to longevity. According to Caspari survivorship increased dramatically in the upper Paleolithic period as a product of cultural change and that longevity opened up the possibility for the creation of culture that defines modern humans.

Соседние файлы в предмете [НЕСОРТИРОВАННОЕ]