- •Cross-cultural universal traits and the culturally specific in human behavior Cross-cultural and Cultural Psychology Knud s. Larsen
- •Introduction
- •Introduction
- •Cross-cultural psychology in a changing world
- •Behavior as culture specific or universal.
- •1.2 The etic and emic approaches.
- •1.3 Cross-cultural psychology and cultural/ indigenous psychology.
- •1.4 Culture versus ethnicity and race.
- •1.6 Toward an inclusive definition of culture.
- •1.5 All groups with a significant history have culture
- •1.6.1 Culture is the evolution of human society.
- •1.6.2 Animal and human culture.
- •1.6.3 The ecological and sociological context.
- •1.7 Resource rich or poor cultures.
- •1.8 Cultural values and dimensions.
- •1.8.1 Universal values.
- •1.8.2 Cultural value dimensions.
- •1.8.3 The social axioms of Leung and Bond.
- •1.9 Enculturation, culture, and psychological outcomes.
- •1.10 Understanding cross-cultural psychology in a changing world.
- •1.11 The major objectives of cross-cultural psychology.
- •1.12 The ethnocentrism of Psychology.
- •Summary
- •Research approaches and critical thinking in cross-cultural psychology
- •2.1 Cultural bias and criterion of equivalence.
- •2.1.1 The issue of language equivalence.
- •2.1.2 Psychometric equivalence.
- •2.1.3 Selecting equivalent samples in cross-cultural psychology.
- •2.2 Nonequivalence in cross-cultural research.
- •2.3 Levels of inference.
- •2.4 Studies of cultural level ecological averages.
- •2.5 What is measured in cross-cultural research?
- •2.6 Bias in psychological assessments.
- •2.7 Inferences from statistical tests on cross-cultural comparisons.
- •2.8 Experimental versus correlational studies.
- •2.9 Qualitative and quantitative research in cross-cultural psychology.
- •2.10 Quantitative comparative cross-cultural research.
- •2.10.1 Surveys.
- •2.10.2 Experiments.
- •2.11 The problems of validity.
- •2.12 A critical look at the findings from cross-cultural comparisons.
- •2.13 Skeptical thinking is the path to an improved cross-cultural psychology.
- •Summary
- •The origin of culture: cultural transformation and sociocultural evolution
- •3.1 The case for the biological foundations of human characteristics.
- •3.1.1 Evolution and the mechanisms of transmission.
- •3.1.2 Races as a biological and social construct.
- •3.1.3 The role of adaptation.
- •3.2 The research supporting the evolution of human emotion.
- •3.2.1 Universal temperament and personality traits are evidence of common evolved history.
- •3.2.2 Intelligence as a biological and racial construct.
- •3.2.3 Behavior genetics and disease.
- •3.2.4 Hardwired optimism: The driver for cultural development.
- •3.3 Sociobiology and evolutionary psychology.
- •3.3.1 Gender differences in mate selection.
- •3.3.2 Is ethnocentrism and racism a broader manifestation of inclusive fitness for reproductive success?
- •3.4 Culture matters!
- •3.5 Socio-cultural evolution: a little history.
- •3.5.1 The evolution of evolutionary theories.
- •3.5.2 Dual inheritance: Approaches to cultural transmission.
- •3.6 Theories of modernization and post-industrial society.
- •Summary
- •Human development: culture and biology
- •4.1 Socialization or enculturation?
- •4.2 Enculturation and choice.
- •4.3 Authoritative versus authoritarian childrearing approaches and cultural differences.
- •4.4 Creating the climate of home: Cultural and cross-cultural studies.
- •4.4.1 The sleeping arrangements of childhood.
- •4.4.2 Attachment in childhood.
- •4.4.3 Relationships with siblings.
- •4.4.4 The influence of the extended family and peers.
- •4.5 Culture and the educational system.
- •4.6 Socio-economic climate.
- •4.7 Social identity.
- •4.8 Comparative studies in child rearing behaviors.
- •4.9 Human development is incorporation of culture.
- •4.10 Stage theories of human development: Culturally unique or universal.
- •4.10.1 The evolution of cognition.
- •4.10.2 The evolution of moral development.
- •4.10.3 Evolution of psychosocial development.
- •4.11 Human development is the expression of biology: the presence of universal values.
- •4.12 The evolutionary basis for human behavior: Maximizing inclusive fitness.
- •4.13 Perspective in the transmission of culture.
- •Summary
- •The evolution of language and socio-culture
- •5.1 The evolution of socioculture and language.
- •5.2 Language development: the meaning of language terms and early speech.
- •5.3 Cultural language difference and linguistic relativity.
- •5.4 Cultural language and thought.
- •5.5 Universals in language.
- •5.6 Intercultural communication.
- •5.6.1 Obstacles and uncertainty reduction in intercultural communication.
- •5.6.2 The affect of bilingualism.
- •5.7 Nonverbal communication and culture.
- •5.8 Darwinian evolution and phylogenetic trees of language and socio-cultural evolution.
- •5.8.1 Selective group genetic advantages in cultural evolution.
- •5.8.2 The analogy of genetic and cultural evolution.
- •5.9 The tree branching of cultural traits.
- •5.10 Limitations of genetic and cultural co-evolutionary theory: Horizontal and vertical cultural evolution.
- •5.11 Cultural stability: Processes countering cultural evolution.
- •5.11.1 Migration and cultural stability.
- •5.11.2 Conformity and geographical mechanisms affecting cultural evolution and language development.
- •5.12 Social learning: Imitating success.
- •5.13 Religion, agriculture development and cultural evolution.
- •5.14 Phylogenetic evidence of the socio-cultural origins of language and other cultural traits.
- •5.14.1 Tracing the evolution of languages.
- •5.14.2 Evidence of language evolution.
- •5.15 Culture as a function of evolving information.
- •5.16 How did language evolve?
- •5.16.1 Contacts between different language speakers.
- •5.16.2 Artefactual languages.
- •Cognition: our common biology and cultural impact
- •6.1 Culture and cognition.
- •6.1.1 Sensation and perception.
- •6.1.2 Cultural impact on sensation and perception.
- •6.2 Cognitive development.
- •6.3 Cognitive style and cultural values.
- •6.3.1 Field dependent and independent cognitive style.
- •6.3.2 Perception studies and cognitive style.
- •6.3.3 Collectivistic and individualistic cognition.
- •6.3.4 Greek versus Asian thinking style.
- •6.3.5 Dialectical and logical thinking.
- •6.3.6 Authoritarianism and dogmatism as a cognitive style.
- •6.4 The general processor implied in cognitive styles versus contextualized cognition.
- •6.5 Cognitive style and priming cognition.
- •6.6 Cross-cultural differences in cognition as a function of practical imperatives.
- •6.7 Intelligence and adaptation: general and cross-cultural aspects.
- •6.7.1 Definitions of general intelligence.
- •6.7.2 Nature or nurture: What determines intelligence?
- •6.7.3 Sources of bias in intelligence testing.
- •6.7.4 Socioeconomic differences and fairness.
- •6.7.5 Race and the interaction effect.
- •6.8 The use of psychological tests in varying cultures.
- •6.9 How intelligence is viewed in other cultures.
- •6.10 General processes in higher order cognition and intelligence.
- •6.10.1 Categorization.
- •6.10.2 Memory functions.
- •6.10.3 Mathematical abilities.
- •6.10.4 The ultimate pedagogical goal: Creativity.
- •Summary
- •Emotions and human happiness: universal expressions and cultural values
- •7.1 The universality of emotions: Basic neurophysiological responses.
- •7.1.1 How we understand the emotion of others: Facial expressions.
- •7.1.2 The effect of language and learning: Criticisms of studies supporting genetically based facial recognition.
- •7.1.3 The definitive answer to the source of the facial expressions of emotions: Biology is the determinant.
- •7.1.4 Universal agreement and cultural emphasis in other emotion constructs.
- •7.1.4.1 Antecedents of emotions.
- •7.1.4.2 Vocalization and intonation in emotional expression.
- •7.1.4.3 Appraisal of emotion.
- •7.2 The role of culture in emotional reactions.
- •7.2.1 The display of emotions.
- •7.2.2 Individualistic versus collectivistic cultures: Display rules in emotion intensity and negativity ratings.
- •7.2.3 Personal space and gestures: Cultural influences in non-verbal communication.
- •7.2.4 Cross-cultural differences in evaluating emotions in other people.
- •7.3. The cultural context of emotional communication.
- •7.4 Toward a positive psychology of emotion: Happiness and well-being.
- •7.4.1 Methodological issues in definitions of happiness and well-being.
- •7.4.2 Sources of well-being.
- •7.4.3 The trending of happiness scores and economic crises and transitions.
- •7.4.4 The impact of culture on happiness and subjective well-being.
- •7.4.5 Creating social policies that promote well-being.
- •7.4.6 The role of national and local government.
- •Personality theory: western, eastern and indigenous approaches
- •8.1 Western thoughts on personality.
- •8.1.1 Freud’s contributions.
- •8.1.2 The humanistic approach to personality.
- •8.1.3 Social-cognitive interaction theory.
- •8.1.4 Locus of control
- •8.1.5 Cross-cultural research on locus of control and autonomy: In control or being controlled.
- •8.1.6 Personality types and hardwired foundations.
- •8.1.7 The Big Five.
- •8.1.8 The genetic and evolutionary basis of personality.
- •8.1.9 Is national character a psychological reality?
- •8.2 Eastern thoughts about personality.
- •8.2.1 The Buddhist tradition.
- •8.2.2 The self and causation.
- •8.2.3 Buddhism and consciousness.
- •8.2.4 Buddhism as a therapeutic approach.
- •8.2.5 A critical thought.
- •8.3 Confucian perspective on personality and the self.
- •8.4 Culture specific personality: As seen from the perspective of indigenous cultures.
- •8.5 Some evaluative comments on Confucianism and indigenous psychology.
- •Summary
- •Culture, sex and gender
- •10.1 Culture and gender.
- •10.1.1 Sex roles, gender stereotypes, and culture.
- •10.1. 2 Gender and families.
- •10.1.3 Traditional versus egalitarian sex role ideologies.
- •10.2 Gender stereotypes and discrimination against women.
- •10.2.1 Dissatisfaction with body image.
- •10.2.2 Equal work equal pay?
- •10.3 Violence against women: a dirty page of history and contemporary society.
- •10.3.1 Intimate violence: The ubiquitous nature of rape.
- •10.3.2 Sexual exploitation.
- •10.3.3 Gender justice and the empowerment of women.
- •10.3.4 Gender ability differences and the role of culture.
- •10.3.5 Culture and Gender differences in spatial abilities.
- •10.3.6 Current research on gender differences in mathematical abilities.
- •10.3.7 Gender and conformity.
- •10.3.8 Gender and aggression.
- •10.4 Sexual behavior and culture.
- •10.4.1 Mate selection.
- •10.4.2 Attractiveness and culture.
- •10.4.3 The future of love and marriage.
- •Summary
- •Culture and human health
- •12.1 The injustice of health disparities in the world.
- •12.1.1 Socio-economic disparities and well-being.
- •12.1.2 Mental health among ethnic minorities: Injustice in the United States.
- •12.1.3 Migrants, refugees and stress: Mental health outcomes.
- •12.2 The role of culture.
- •12.2.1 Cultural health beliefs.
- •12.2.2 Problems in cultural definitions of abnormality and mental illness
- •12.3 Psychopathology as universal or relativist.
- •12.4 Culturally specific and universal factors in mental health.
- •12.4.1 Anxiety disorders.
- •12.4.2 Regulation of mood: Depression.
- •12.4.3 Schizophrenia.
- •12.4.4 Attention deficit disorder.
- •12.4.5 Personality disorders.
- •12.5 Culturally sensitive assessment of abnormal behavior.
- •12.6 Cross-cultural assessments of mental disorder.
- •12.7 Abnormal behavior and psychotherapy from cultural perspectives.
- •12.7.1 The cultural framework matters in psychotherapy.
- •12.7.2 Homogeneity of patient and therapist.
- •12.7.3 Approaches based in indigenous forms of treatment.
- •12.7.4 Adding the biomedical model to indigenous beliefs.
- •Summary
4.12 The evolutionary basis for human behavior: Maximizing inclusive fitness.
According to sociobiological explanations all human behavior is aimed at maximizing inclusive fitness that motivates people to promote the interests of genetically related people. The concept of inclusive fitness for the human species is not limited to offspring, but includes also maximizing the interest of other kin including nephews and nieces (Wilson, 1975). The promotion of the interest of kin is central to evolutionary reproductive success for social species like humans. Sociobiology extends the argument of genetic determinants of behavior to human on a very broad scale. Wilson suggests that most of the branches of human knowledge in social sciences or humanities are reducible to the biology or sociobiology of a species.
4.13 Perspective in the transmission of culture.
It is the obligation of researchers to examine both cultural as well as genetic bases in cultural transmission. The genetic underpinnings of culture are essential components in the development of cultural solutions to environmental problems. However, cultural information is transmitted by social interaction from one generation to the next. The capacity for learning is limited by our genetic inheritance, but the cultural information channels offer the possibility to pass on cultural knowledge to our offspring. Life teaches us what is useful to survival or social success, and that information is conveyed by parents and other cultural guardians. Social learning theory explains many of the differences found in comparative studies as people learn by observation and imitation. It is important to remember that members of society are not passive spectators in cultural transmission. People interact with their cultures for evolutionary benefit and create niches that serve the purpose of reproductive success (Laland, Odling-Smee, & Feldman, 2000). Members of cultural groups participate in creating niches for example some population groups have dominated certain professions like medicine or the sale of jewelry as these were found over time to be successful niches ensuring survival through several generations.
Summary
The central concern of cross-cultural psychology is how people acquire culturally unique traits as well as communalities in behaviors across cultures. All theories of learning apply to the transmission of culture in interactions with parents, siblings, the educational system, and the ecological context. Socialization is the deliberate teaching of cultural values by parents and others whereas enculturation refer to the internalized psychological end product. In other words socialization is the means to the encultural ends. Through the transmission of culture society pass on the skills and values thought important to survival and successful living.
There are both important similarities between cultures, but also distinct differences in childrearing as some cultures emphasize conformity and obedience and other societies promote personal independence. The ecological context, socio-political environment, customs, and psychology of caregivers provide the important niche components defining child development. However, the child is not a passive observer but actively interacts with these developmental forces and in the process affect the construal of the self. Childrearing ideology describes the dominant parental beliefs in society about the best way to raise children, and how to nurture and express warmth and affection. These and other values are inculcated in all members of a culture in the process of development. Affluent societies have more resources and time to develop unique assets of the child, whereas parents in poor societies are just struggling to stay afloat and survive.
Childrearing styles identified as authoritative and authoritarian have been found to have significant outcomes. Authoritative parents provide child care that is firm, but also reasonable and fair. The context of authoritative child rearing includes the consistent expression of warmth and affection. Authoritarian parents on the other hand demand obedience and practice strict control. Research has demonstrated the superiority of the authoritative style producing more positive emotions in the child more self-confidence, with long-lasting consequences.
The climate of home life is the major context in the transmission of cultural values. Differences have been observed between collectivistic and individualistic societies in the interaction of parents with the educational system. Sleeping with the mother is the earliest form of security in the home and also varies by culture. In the U.S. parents generally try to create early independence in all aspects of childrearing, and as a substitute for sleeping with the mother the child is provided with security blankets and sleep in separate quarters at the earliest moment possible. However, parents in other societies believe that keeping the child physically close provide essential security for later development. Socio-economic factors may also play a role also in sleeping arrangements. Bonding has more utility in societies struggling to survive and that context may favor intimate sleeping patterns. Further, poverty may prevent the creation of additional space for separate sleeping arrangements.
The means of creating attachment in childhood varies by culture. The use of physical touch and verbal stimulation are dependent on cultural values and beliefs. Attachment is considered an important psychological achievement essential for later cultural learning. Relationships to siblings represent an early cultural influence. In fact the significant events of family and cultural life are sifted through the eyes of siblings, and cultural interdependence is taught by these relationships. How to act properly in social interaction and in gender relationships is primarily mediated by sibling relationships.
The extended family is also a source of cultural knowledge. Peers and the extended family reinforce the important cultural values in society. Material and emotional interdependence is particularly important in pre-industrial societies and in those cultures where people struggle to survive. By contrast interdependence is limited to the immediate family in Western countries and Western societies foster the separated and independent self. Although the research results are ambiguous it is thought that the self is construed differentially in collectivistic and individualistic cultures. Extended families are more involved in child rearing in collectivistic cultures. Ethnic groups in multi-cultural societies may continue to transmit the cultural expectation on gender related behavior and loyalty unique to their own group.
Culture is mediated by the country’s educational system. Schools are major socializing agents in most societies in the world and serve to inculcate cultural values. In individualistic societies the educational system serves to prepare the student for a competitive future through the emphasis on grading, ranking, and competitive sports. The influence of peers on cultural learning increases in the school years. The socio-economic climate also affects development. In societies struggling for survival children learn motor skills at an earlier age compared to children from affluent communities. These motor skills are more salient to aid survival in harsh environments. Birth death rates vary by culture. Where the rates are high mothers must concentrate all their efforts on the survival of their infants and few parental resources are available to promote other assets of the child or provide enriching learning experiences. Eventually social identity grows out of the home climate and children learn early to identify with ingroups and reference groups. Children from individualistic societies also learn early the utility of competiveness for success and achievement.
Comparative studies in child rearing show that attachment experiences vary by culture as parental warmth and affection are not expressed in the same way in all cultures. In some cultures parents use physical touch to express loving feelings whereas in other cultures parents utilize their voices and intonation to express warmth. However, in all cultures parents have a desire for their children to learn emotional and social skills. Parents everywhere also use assertive behavior when disciplining their children for infractions. Parental ideology or ethnotheories play important but varying roles in different societies. These theories define play time interactions and the actual time spent with their children. Adherence to cultural values is a parental concern in all societies; however mothers in collectivistic cultures are more concerned when the child displays a lack of cooperation, whereas American mothers are more worried about their children’s disruptive behavior.
In some cultural or social groups parents have no childrearing ideology believing that their children can manage development without interference. However, in most cultures parents believe they must play an active role in raising their children. In collectivistic societies parents demand strict obedience and provide sanctions for behavior that does not meet expectations. Parental authoritarianism is related to a lack of cultural and socio-economic stability. The emphasis on competition leads Western parents to have expectations for the early development of skills.
The origin of human cognition is human interaction. In fact human “nature” does not exist in isolation from culture. Culture is the mediating variable between biological and environmental factors. Individual development is determined by the interaction of biology, phylogenetic development, and cultural variables. Culture provides the framework for the social interactions and mediates the internalization of cultural values. Culture also plays a role in lifespan development since it provides support services needed in the later stages of aging without which a person would not survive.
Stage theories in cognition, moral development and psychosocial development describe individual change in processes thought universal. Piaget’s theory examines the evolution of cognition in four stages. Evidence from the comparative literature supports the universality of the early cognitive stage sequences. However, there is little evidence for the universality of “formal operations” as this type of abstract thinking probably requires a Western education. The ages at which children master the early stages also appear to vary by culture. Moral development is evaluated in Kohlberg’s theory in 6 stages. Some evidence for the universality of the first two stages is supported by comparative research. However, the higher stages appear to reflect Western moral traditions. The stability of moral stages is questioned since circumstances and powerful situations may cancel any stage of moral development. Kohlberg has also been criticized for gender bias since males and females view relationships differentially. Other criticisms focus on the influence of individualistic cultures on the higher stages of moral development. Erickson believed that all human beings pass through 8 psychosocial stages starting at birth and ending with death. At each stage a crisis occurs that if solved in a positive way leads to stronger egos and better adaptability. The main criticism of psychosocial development theory is that it reflects the normative culture of the West. Psychosocial development takes a different road in societies struggling for survival, and social identity is prescribed in some societies and not the outcome of crisis. The aforementioned discussion has emphasized cultural transmission from the perspective of the socio-cultural context. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the biological underpinnings of cultural behavior. The important study of survival and cultural adaptation is based on evolutionary principles.
Chapter 5
