Рекомендуемая литература:

1. Hilton, James L.; von Hippel, William (1996). "Stereotypes". Annual Review of Psychology 47 (1): 237–271. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237

2. Stuart Ewen, Elizabeth Ewen, Typecasting: On the Arts and Sciences of Human Inequality. New York (Seven Stories Press) 2006

3. Turner, Chris (2004). Planet Simpson: How a Cartoon Masterpiece Documented an Era and Defined a Generation. Toronto: Random House Canada.

4. Судаков К. В. Динамические стереотипы, или Информационные отпечатки действительности. М.: ПЕР СЭ, 2002.

5. Рябова, Т. Б. Стереотипы и стереотипизация как проблема гендерных исследований / Т. Б. Рябова // Личность. Культура. Общество. — 2003. — Т. V. Вып. 1-2 (15-16).

6. Фол С. Эти странные американцы. – М.: Эгмонт России, Лтд, 1999.

“Culture Shock: Stages and Ways to overcome culture shock.”

• Проблема: Dealing with culture shock.

• Идея проекта: Positive and negative outcomes of culture shock.

• Цель проекта: To study culture shock.

• Задачи проекта:

1. To give definition of culture.

2. To analyze characteristics of culture.

3. To give an overview of:

• Phases of culture shock.

• Symptoms of culture shock

• Positive effects of culture shock

• Causes of culture shock

• Actions against culture shock.

• Использование в процессе проектной работы компетенций и субкомпетенций:

социо-культурная компетенция, информационно-поисковая, аналитико-прогнозная.

• Возможные варианты решения поставленной проблемы:

- To solve the problems of staying abroad for a long period.

- To find out advantages and disadvantages of coping with culture shock .

- To take into consideration the experience of other countries.

• Конечный продукт проектной работы – доклад на международной студенческой конференции.

Рекомендуемая литература:

1. Bennett, M. J. “Becoming Interculturally Competent.” In Wurzel, J. Toward multiculturalism: A Reader in Multicultural Education. Newton: Intercultural Resource Corporation, 2004.

2. DeVito, J. A. Messages: Building Interpersonal Communication Skills. New York: Longman,

3. Fisher, G. Mindset: The Role of Culture and Perception in International Relations. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press, 1997.

4. Geertz, C. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books, 1973.

5. Harris, P. R. and R. T. Moran. Managing Cultural Differences. Houston: Gulf, 1991. Manz, S. Culture Shock – Causes, Consequences and Solutions: The International Experience. Scholarly Research Paper, 2003. 15. Nov. 2010. <http://www.grin.com/e-book/108360/cultureshock-causes-consequences-and-solutions-the-international-experience>.

6. Nolan, R. W. Communicating and Adapting Across Cultures: Living and Working in the Global Village. Westport: Bergin, 1999.

7. Pedersen, P. The Five Stages of Culture Shock: Critical Incidents Around the World. London: Greenwood Press, 1995.

8. Shulman, M. Cultures in Contrast. University of Michigan, 1998.

9. Singer, M. Perception and Identity in Intercultural Communication. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press, 1998.

10. Culture Shock. Best-Career-Match. 2010. 12. Dec. 2010. <http://www.best-careermatch.com/culture-shock.html>.

11. Culture Shock. Pedia View. 20. May 2010.

12. <http://pediaview.com/openpedia/Culture_shock#Honeymoon_Phase>.

“Customs and business protocol of different countries.”

• Проблема: Why business etiquette is so important?

• Идея проекта: Business protocol varies from country to country.

• Цель проекта: To study and compare business protocols.

• Задачи проекта:

1. To analyze business etiquette of different countries.

2. To give an example of various business protocol.

3. To compare business protocol of your country with other countries.

• Использование в процессе проектной работы компетенций и субкомпетенций:

социо-культурная компетенция, информационно-поисковая, аналитико-прогнозная.

• Возможные варианты решения поставленной проблемы:

- To solve the problems of communicating with foreign business colleagues.

- To find out business customs, unwritten rules, business protocol.

- To take into consideration the experience of other countries.

• Конечный продукт проектной работы – доклад на международной студенческой конференции.