- •Your Writing Portfolio
- •Language Biography
- •It should be completed on the basis of self-assessment, peer assessment, expert assessment results according to the specifications of Common European Framework.
- •Letter Writing Assessment Checklist: Assessment of the Structure: Rating Scale Assess your own paper using the following rating scale and answer the questions after it.
- •Assessment Rubric for Letters: Analytical Scale For Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment: Holistic Scale 1 for Self-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment Scale: Holistic Scale 2 for Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Checklist
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment scale: Integrative Scale for Expert Assessment Name _________________________________ Period__________ Date _________
- •Assessment rubrics of letter writing
- •Integrative Scale: Expert Assessment
Letter Writing Assessment Checklist: Assessment of the Structure: Rating Scale Assess your own paper using the following rating scale and answer the questions after it.
Rating Scale: 1 = very weak, 2 = weak, 3 = okay, 4 = very good, 5 = super
Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Comments |
1. Introduction catches reader’s interests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. The subject is developed in the body paragraphs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Every paragraph starts with a transition. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Body paragraphs contain one to three explanatory sentences. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Body paragraphs contain two to four sentences about specific details to achieve the communicative purpose of the letter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Specific features are used to support ideas of a certain type of letter: details, supporting arguments, ideas, examples. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Features are colourful, interesting, appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Every paragraph ends with a good closing sentence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Wording and ideas are fresh and interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Correct introductory, conclusion, linking phrases are used according to the type of letter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Contains no run-ons or sentence fragments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Is free of errors in agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Is free of punctuation errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Is free of spelling errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Handwriting is easy to read. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
What are the strongest points of your paper?
What should you do as the writer to make this paragraph better?
Student Letter Writing Assessment Checklist: Integrative Scale:
Use this checklist to assess your progress in Writing Competence
Assess your own paper using the following rating scale, it`ll help to see your progress.
Rating Scale: 1 = very weak, 2 = weak, 3 = okay, 4 = very good, 5 = super
Criteria |
My paper demonstrates |
Score |
Comments |
Conven- tions |
* My paragraphs are sound. * Each of my paragraphs has one main idea or united by the main idea. * I have used correct grammar. * I have used correct punctuation. * Periods are at the ends of my sentences. * My spelling is correct. * My handwriting is legible. |
|
|
Fluency |
* My sentences begin in different ways. * My sentences build upon the ones before it. * My sentences are different lengths. * The meaning of each of my sentences is clear. * My sentences flow and use correct grammar. * There are no run-ons. * My sentences are complete |
|
|
Organization |
* My paper is sequenced in order. * My introduction is exciting and inviting. * My ideas flow and are well connected.
* I have a satisfying conclusion. |
|
|
Capitali- zation |
* I have capitalized the first word in every sentence. * I have capitalized people and pet names. * I have capitalized months and days. * I have capitalized cities, provinces, and places. * I have capitalized titles of books, movies, etcetera |
|
|
Word Choice |
* Every word seems just right. * I used a lot of describing words (adjectives and adverbs). * I use strong verbs like darted and exclaimed. * I used synonyms to add variety. |
|
|
Ideas |
*I used brainstorming or a story map to create and organize ideas. * My ideas are written in my own words. * My paper is clear and focused. I stay on target. * I understand my topic. * My details give the reader important information. * My ideas relate to one another. * I have listened to suggestions from the teacher or peer writers. |
|
|
Writing Evaluation Rubric of Project Tasks: Integrative Scale
|
Basic |
Marginal |
Advanced |
Proficiency |
Writing Process |
- Little evidence of plan/focus. - Little evidence of revision. - Little attempt at editing. |
- Some evidence of plan/focus. - Some evidence of revision. - Some attempt at editing. |
- Much evidence of plan/focus. - Much evidence of revision. - Much attempt at editing |
- Plan improves overall quality of work. - Revisions improve overall quality of work. - Effective editing |
Storyline-Development of Focus/ Theme |
- Many ideas do not relate to theme. - Some details, supporting information, arguments are missing or lacking direction. - The communicative purpose is insufficiently acieved. |
- Develops ideas that usually relate to the focus/theme. -Some details, supporting information, arguments are given. - The communicative purpose is mostly achieved, but the response is given in an ordinary, functional form |
- Develops ideas so that they relate to the focus/theme. - Sufficient details, supporting information, arguments are given. - The communicative purpose is mostly achieved, but the response is given in an interesting, creative form |
- Develops ideas clearly relating to the focus/theme. - All the details, supporting information, arguments are exceptionally related to the topic. - The communicative purpose is mostly achieved, but the response is given in a, creative form. |
Organization - Logical order or sequence is maintained - Paragraphs deal with one subject - Logical transitions are made within sentences and between paragraphs -Introduction, main body, conclusion are evident |
Confused organization |
Inconsistent organization |
Logical and appropriate organization |
Obviously controlled and/or subtle organization |
Word Choices/ Styles: - Precise language - Effective word choice - Voice, tone, originality of language - Variety of sentence structures, types, and lengths |
Lack of sentence and word choice variety |
Limited sentence variety and word choice |
Precision and variety in sentence structure and work choice |
Writer’s voice apparent in tone, sentence structure, and word choice |
Conventions: - Mechanics -Grammar -Word Usage (verb tense, subject/verb, noun/ pronoun, agreement, etc.) -capitalization punctuation - Sentence completeness |
Mechanical and usage errors that seriously interfere with the writer's purpose |
Repeated weaknesses in mechanics and usage |
Some mechanical and usage errors |
Few mechanical and usage errors |
