- •Your Writing Portfolio
- •Language Biography
- •It should be completed on the basis of self-assessment, peer assessment, expert assessment results according to the specifications of Common European Framework.
- •Letter Writing Assessment Checklist: Assessment of the Structure: Rating Scale Assess your own paper using the following rating scale and answer the questions after it.
- •Assessment Rubric for Letters: Analytical Scale For Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment: Holistic Scale 1 for Self-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment Scale: Holistic Scale 2 for Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
- •Writing Portfolio Checklist
- •Writing Portfolio Assessment scale: Integrative Scale for Expert Assessment Name _________________________________ Period__________ Date _________
- •Assessment rubrics of letter writing
- •Integrative Scale: Expert Assessment
Assessment rubrics of letter writing
Integrative Scale: Expert Assessment
Analytical Score_ |
Level |
Score |
Criteria |
Cognitive aspect of communicative competence in writing |
Organiza- tion and coherence structure |
Proficiency 3 2 1 |
Ideas are clearly focused on the topic throughout the response. Organization demonstrates a logical, well-executed progression of ideas that effectively supports the persuasive purpose and is relevant to the writer’s approaches to organization (e.g., analyzing, evaluating, narrating, etc.). Transitions effectively convey relationships among ideas. Sentence structure is well controlled and varied to communicate relationships among ideas. |
Advavced 3 2 1 |
Ideas are usually focused on the topic. Organization is clear and may demonstrate a logical progression of ideas that supports the communicative purpose and is relevant to the writer’s approaches to organization. Transitions clearly convey relationships among ideas. Sentence structure is well controlled to communicate relationships among ideas and varied as appropriate for the writer’s purpose. |
||
Basic 3 2 1 |
Ideas are usually focused on the topic, and an organizational structure is evident. Ideas are logically grouped and adequately reflect the writer’s use of relevant approaches to organization. Relationships among ideas are mostly clear. |
||
Marginal 3 2 1
|
Most ideas are focused on the topic. The response uses a simple organizational structure, and, for the most part, ideas are logically grouped. There is some evidence of the writer’s use of approaches to organization, but they may not be clearly relevant, or they may be confusing. Relationships among ideas are sometimes unclear. Sentence structure is usually correct and there may be a little sentence variety to communicate relationships among ideas. |
||
0 |
Response is too brief to score; not written in English; off topic; or illegible. |
||
Style and word choice |
Proficiency 3 2 1 |
Approaches to the development of ideas (e.g., summarizing, narrating, etc.) are used skillfully to support the communicative purpose. Word choice is precise and evaluative and supports the communicative purpose. Voice and tone are well controlled and effective for the writer’s purpose and audience. |
|
Advanced 3 2 1 |
Approaches to the development of ideas are usually used skillfully to support the communicative purpose. Word choice is usually precise and evaluative and usually supports the communicative purpose. Voice and tone are usually controlled and effective for the writer’s purpose and audience. |
||
Basic 3 2 1 |
Approaches to the development of ideas are adequate, but their relevance to the communicative purpose may not always be clear. Word choice is clear, often evaluative, and adequately supports the communicative purpose. Voice and tone are mostly controlled and usually effective for the writer’s purpose and audience. |
||
Marginal 3 2 1 |
Approaches to development of ideas are evident, but they may not be clearly relevant to the persuasive purpose. Word choice is usually clear and sometimes evaluative but at times may not be appropriate for the writer’s purpose. Voice and tone show some understanding of what is appropriate for the writer’s purpose and audience. |
||
0 |
Response is too brief to score; not written in English; off topic; or illegible. |
||
Linguistic aspect of communicative competence in writing |
content |
Profociency 3 2 1 |
The response formulates a clear position that recognizes and acknowledges multiple significant aspects of the issue and insightfully addresses the complexities of the issue. The response demonstrates insight by fully addressing other perspectives, by using affective arguments, examples, justifications so that communicative purpose is achieved |
Advanced 3 2 1 |
The response formulates a position that recognizes and acknowledges multiple significant aspects of the issue but may not fully address some of the complexities of the issue. The response demonstrates some insight by acknowledging and partially addressing other perspectives, by using affective arguments, examples, justifications so that communicative purpose is mostly achieved |
||
Basic 3 2 1 |
The response takes a position and may acknowledge significant aspects of the issue. The response demonstrates some understanding of other perspectives and may evaluate some implications of the writer’s position. If affective arguments, examples, justifications are used, they fulfill communicative purpose of the written paper. While details, examples, arguments, justifications provide adequate evidence to support the writer’s position, their development may be somewhat uneven. |
||
Marginal 3 2 1 |
The response states a position but addresses only some of the aspects of the issue. Some relevant reasons and evidence (details, examples, arguments, justifications) for the writer’s position are used, but they are not developed enough to fulfill the communicative purpose, or they may be unevenly developed. |
||
0 |
Response is too brief to score; not written in English; off topic; or illegible. |
||
Language and vocabulary use |
Proficiency 3 2 1 |
Word and grammar choice is precise, clear throughout the response and supports the communicative purpose. Effective complex constructions are used; few errors in agreement, almost no errors in tense, number, word order, articles, prepositions, pronouns |
|
Advanced 3 2 1 |
Word and grammar choice is usually correct, with a few distracting errors, the meaning and communicative purpose is mostly clear. Effective but simple constructions are used; several errors of agreement, tense, number, word order, articles, prepositions, pronouns |
||
Basic 3 2 1
|
Word and grammar choice are mostly incorrect with frequent distracting errors, the response shows an attempt to organize thoughts, but the meaning is confused throughout the response. Problems in simple complex constructions; frequent errors of agreement, tense, number, word order, articles, prepositions, pronouns |
||
Marginal 3 2 1 |
Word and grammar choice are mostly incorrect with frequent distracting errors that impede understanding and achievement of communicative purpose. No mastery of sentence construction rules, abundance of errors. |
||
0 |
Word and grammar choice is illegible, or the response is too brief to score; off topic. |
||
Spelling |
Proficiency 3 |
few errors in spelling, capitalization. |
|
Advanced 2 |
occasional errors in spelling, capitalization. |
||
Basic 1 |
frequent errors in spelling, capitalization. |
||
Marginal 0 |
abundance of errors in spelling, capitalization. |
||
Punctuation |
Proficiency 3 |
few errors in punctuation, paragraph division. |
|
Advanced 2 |
occasional errors in punctuation, paragraph division. |
||
Basic 1 |
frequent in punctuation, paragraph division. |
||
Marginal 0 |
abundance of errors in punctuation, paragraph division. |
Description of the writing level
Level |
Description of the achievement level |
54 – 49 (100-90 %) Proficiency level |
Response demonstrates effective skill in responding to the writing task. All elements of the response are well controlled and effectively support the writer’s purpose, audience, and form. |
48 – 43 (88 – 80 %) Advanced level |
Response in this range demonstrates competent skill in responding to the writing task. Elements are usually well controlled and clearly support the writer’s purpose, audience, and form. |
42 – 33 (77 – 60 %) Basic level |
Response demonstrates adequate skill in responding to the writing task. Most elements are controlled and support the writer’s purpose, audience, and form. |
32 – < (< 60 %) Marginal level |
Response demonstrates developing skill in responding to the writing task. Some elements are controlled and provide some support for the writer’s purpose, audience, and form. |
Achievement Level Descriptions in Writing
Level |
Description of the achievement level: Students performing at the level should be able to: |
Basic achievement level descriptions |
Create an appropriate response to the topic, purpose and audience |
Present ideas that are relevant to the topic, purpose, and audience and show evidence of thinking and writing approaches that support development of ideas |
|
Use supporting details relevant to the topic, purpose, and audience |
|
Create a response that usually focuses on the topic and whose organizational structure shows some evidence of appropriate thinking and writing approaches |
|
Sentences are correct and the response uses some sentence variety as appropriate to communicate relationships among ideas |
|
Use word choice that is clear and appropriate for the topic, purpose, and audience |
|
Use voice and tone that are appropriate for the topic, purpose, and audience |
|
Use grammar, usage, and mechanics that are mostly correct but with a few distracting errors that may occasionally impede understanding |
|
Marginal Achievement Level Descriptions |
Create a response that`s inappropriate to the topic, purpose and audience |
Present the ideas that are mostly unsupported, undeveloped, unclear. Present the ideas that do not progress fluently in the response, there are some unity problems |
|
Present a response that length is inappropriate for the task. Create the writing piece that is too short, without development of ideas |
|
Present a response that has a poor organization, the organization shows the writer`s problems with thinking and writing approaches, the organization interferes with the meaning |
|
Use sentences that are incorrect; word choice is unclear and inappropriate; and there is little or no control of appropriate voice and tone. |
|
Grammar, usage, and mechanics are sometimes correct but with frequent distracting errors that impede understanding |
|
Advanced Achievement Level Descriptions |
Create an insightful response to the topic, purpose, and audience |
Present thoughtful and complex ideas to support the topic and effectively use approaches for thinking and writing that support development of ideas |
|
Create a response with an organizational structure that has a clear and effective logical progression of ideas and that reflects effective use of relevant thinking and writing approaches |
|
Use sentences that are well controlled and varied, as appropriate, to communicate relationships among ideas |
|
Use specific and precise word choice appropriate for the topic, purpose, and audience |
|
Use voice and tone that are well controlled for the topic, purpose, and audience |
|
Demonstrate strong command of grammar, usage, and mechanics and use these elements to enhance the presentation of ideas |
|
Proficiency Achievement Level Descriptions |
Create a competent response to the topic, purpose,and audience |
Present some ideas that support the topic, purpose, and audience and show consistent evidence of effective thinking and writing approaches that support development of ideas |
|
Use specific and relevant supporting details to develop ideas |
|
Create a response that is organized logically, using effective and relevant thinking and writing approaches to support a logical progression of ideas |
|
Use sentences that are controlled and that are varied, as appropriate, for the topic, purpose, and audience |
|
Use some specific and precise word choice that is appropriate to communicate relationships among ideas |
|
Use voice and tone that are controlled and appropriate for the topic, purpose, and audience |
|
Use grammar, usage, and mechanics that are mostly correct but with a few distracting errors |
Writing assessment scales
Put all the assessment scales that were used to assess your papers: self-assessment scale, peer assessment scales. Rank the assessment you`ve used in the order of your priority after finishing the course of study of “Successful letter writing: formal letters”.
Are you a successful writer?
Letter Assessment Scale: Holistic Scale
for Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
Student Letter Writing Assessment Checklist for Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
Letter Writing Assessment Checklist: Assessment of the Structure Rating Scale
Student Letter Writing Assessment Checklist: Integrative Scale
Writing Evaluation Rubric of Project Tasks: Integrative Scale
Assessment Rubric for Letters: Analytical Scale for Self-Assessment or Peer-Assessment
Letter Writing Assessment Rubrics: Holistic Scale
Writing Portfolio Checklist:
Rating Scale
Writing Portfolio Assessment: Holistic Scale for Self-Assessment
Assessment rubrics of letter writing: Integrative Scale: Expert Assessment
Achievement Level Descriptions in Writing
