- •Contents
- •Interpretation of contracts
- •A. Principles of interpretation
- •Start (and end) with what the contract says
- •Parties' intention assessed objectively
- •Business common sense
- •The commercial purpose
- •Reasonableness
- •The whole contract approach
- •Correcting mistakes by construction
- •Diminishing role for strict interpretation
- •Directory and mandatory provisions
- •Inconsistent provisions
- •Same approach in law and equity
- •B. Continuing relevance of traditional rules of construction
- •Lawful effect
- •A party may not take advantage of its own wrong
- •Excluding or modifying legal remedies
- •Strict interpretation against one party (contra proferentem)
- •The express excludes the implied (expressio unius rule)
- •General words at the end of a list (the ejusdem generis rule)
- •Section 61 Law of Property Act 1925 presumptions
- •C. Relevant and admissible background
- •D. Precedent value of cases
- •Implied terms
- •A. Usage or custom
- •B. Previous course of dealings
- •C. Terms implied in fact
- •Business efficacy and officious bystander tests
- •Bp Refinery
- •Philips Electronique
- •Marks and Spencer
- •Admissible background
- •Certainty
- •Implication of terms compared with interpretation/construction and rectification for mistake
- •D. Terms frequently implied in fact
- •Right to terminate an indefinite contract
- •Contractual discretion must not be exercised arbitrarily
- •E. Good faith
- •F. Terms implied at common law
- •G. Terms implied by statute
- •H. Excluding implied terms
- •Misrepresentation a. What is a misrepresentation?
- •Types of representee
- •Misrepresentation of law
- •Statement of opinion
- •Implied representations
- •Silence
- •Other requirements for an effective misrepresentation
- •Intention to induce
- •B. Types of misrepresentation
- •Fraudulent misrepresentation
- •Negligent misrepresentation
- •Innocent misrepresentation
- •C. Remedies for misrepresentation
- •Rescission
- •Damages for misrepresentation
- •Innocent misrepresentation
- •D. Negligent misstatement at common law
- •E. Can a representation become a term of the contract?
- •F. Limiting liability for misrepresentation
- •Clauses in contracts
- •Entire agreement clauses
- •Structure and terms of commercial contracts a. Form
- •B. Skeleton structure
- •Front and cover page, back sheet
- •Commencement section and dates
- •Parties
- •Background, recitals, or preamble
- •Operative provisions
- •Preliminary clauses
- •Interpretation
- •Performance obligations
- •Payment obligations
- •Limitations and exclusions of liability
- •Subsidiary obligations
- •Boilerplate
- •Schedules, appendices and other attachments
- •Execution
Performance obligations
Performance obligations specify who is to do what, where, how and when.
An express provision that "time is of the essence" of an agreement enables the party relying upon the clause to terminate the agreement and, if appropriate, claim damages, if the other party fails to perform an obligation in accordance with the date or time specified in the agreement.
Many contracts require a party to achieve a particular objective, or procure its achievement. If the obligation is not qualified, it will amount to an unconditional undertaking by the relevant party that the objective will be achieved, regardless of how onerous it is for that party to achieve it, or even whether it is within that party's power to do so. Accordingly, it is common to see such obligations qualified by an endeavours clause, where a party agrees to use some form of endeavours, or efforts, to achieve the specified objective.
One of the key questions to ask in the context of who does what, when and where, is: What happens if the party fails to perform? One solution is to add a liquidated damages or service credit clause to the agreement.
Liquidated damages clauses
A liquidated damages clause usually provides that, if a supplier fails to complete a performance obligation by a certain date, and the delay does not relate to causes beyond the reasonable control of supplier, then the supplier is obliged to pay to the customer a predefined sum for every week or month of delay. Alternatively, the customer might be entitled to deduct such the amount of liquidated damages from any amounts due to supplier, or recover the same from the supplier as a debt. The aim of a liquidated damages clause should not be to put the supplier into liquidation, but rather to encourage the supplier to divert resources to a speedy completion of the customer’s contract, rather than to the contracts of other customers.
Service credit clauses
A "service credit scheme" is in effect a liquidated damages scheme for services rather than supply of goods. The idea is that if a certain targeted level of performance is not achieved by the supplier, say, during the previous month, the supplier must pay to the customer, or allow the customer to deduct from its payment to supplier, a certain percentage, normally of the monthly fee.
Payment obligations
Payment obligations specify who pays what, how, when and where. The main consideration from the supplier's point of view is that the lawyer drafting the contract goes into the mechanics of what sort of payment will protect the supplier in the particular circumstances of the case. Minimum payment details might include:
Prices or amount of payment.
Whether or not prices include VAT or other taxes.
Frequency of multiple payments.
Method of payment - bank transfer, letter of credit.
Currency of payment.
Country of payment.
Name of bank and account details, with an ability to change these details on notice.
If the customer doesn’t pay or doesn’t pay on time, the supplier may try to protect itself by using such mechanisms as default interest, retention of title, third party guarantee, letters of credit.
