Образцы выполнения заданий

Образец выполнения первого задания

Левая страница	Правая страница
1. The investigator had examined the witness.	1. Следователь допросил свидетеля.
had examined – Past Perfect Active от стандартного глагола to examine.
2. The new evidence of crime was received yesterday.	2.Вчера были получены новые доказательства преступления.
was received – Past Indefinite Passive от нестандартного глагола to receive.

Образец выполнения второго задания

Левая страница	Правая страница
1. The secretary brought the documents signed by the jury.	1. Секретарь принес документы, подписанные коллегией присяжных.
signed – Participle II, определение.
2. Having lived in the district all his life the police inspector knew it very well.	2. Участковый отлично знал район, так как проживал там всю жизнь.
having lived – Participle I, обстоятельство.

Библиографический список

Ионина, А. А. Английская грамматика. Теория и практика [Текст] : учебник / А. А. Ионина, А. С. Саакян. – М. : ТК Велби, Изд-во Проспект, 2008. – 448 с. ISBN 978-5-482-01910-8.

Новолодская, С. Л. Английский язык [Текст] : учебник для студентов всех специальностей неязыкового вуза : ч. 1-2 / С. Л. Новолодская. – Чита : ЗИП СибУПК, 2011. – 426 с. ISBN 978-5-89807-147-9, 978-5-89807-149-149-3.

Чиронова, И. И. Английский язык для юристов [Текст] : учебник / под общ. ред. И. И. Чироновой. – М. : Издательство Юрайт, 2011. – 399 с. ISBN 978-5-9916-1193-0.

Вариант № 1

1. Письменно переведите предложения. Определите видо-временную форму и залог сказуемого. В разделе б) обратите внимание на особенности перевода пассивных конструкций.

1. 1. The witness has just given the evidence in the court.

2. A prospective barrister is participating in the trial.

3. The institute of jury still exists in many countries.

б) 1. A bill is being discussed in the House of Commons now.

2. The law is not enforced against young children.

3. French public law has never been codified.

2. Перепишите предложения, подчеркните Participle I, Participle II, укажите какую функцию в предложении они выполняют:

а) определение;

б) обстоятельство;

в) часть сложного сказуемого.

1. The prosecuting barrister represents the state.

2. The jury is still discussing the verdict.

3. Testifying in the court the witness told the truth.

4. Customs are not made by governments.

3. Перепишите и переведите предложения, подчеркните в каждом из них модальный глагол или его эквивалент.

1. A solicitor can represent the accused in the court.

2. Force is to be used only when strictly necessary.

3. An arrested person must have access to a lawyer.

4. A verdict has to be unanimous.

4. Письменно переведите следующие предложения, обращая внимание на усилительные конструкции.

1. It was the judge Pavlov who passed the verdict.

2. It is the State Duma that approves candidates to judges of the Constitutional Court.

3. It is professor Brown who expressed his viewpoint on death penalty as capital punishment.

5. Прочитайте весь текст и письменно переведите 1, 4, 5 абзацы. Из 2 и 3 абзацев выпишите и переведите предложения с Participle I и II.

Juries

1. The use of the jury in English law stretches far into history, the modern English jury now owes its statutory existence to the Juries Act 1974.

2. To qualify for jury service it is necessary to be a registered elector between the ages of 18 and 65 (the property qualification for jurors was abolished). All those people connected with the law by way of occupation (including ex-prisoners) are ineligible to jury service, as well as the clergy and the mentally ill. Barristers, solicitors and police officers must have retired from that work for a minimum of ten years.

3. The call to jury service is regarded as an obligation. A jury is normally composed of twelve persons whose names have been selected at random from the list of qualified jurors for the area. Its verdict must be unanimous (it is essentially one of «guilty» or «not guilty») and, in the event of failure to reach agreement, the case is retried before another jury. Only 6-7% of jury decisions are by a majority verdict.

4. Juries most frequently appear in criminal cases in the Crown Courts. The function of the jury is to determine the facts, having heard the judge’s summing up and his directions on questions of law.

5. Counsel for the defence or the defendant have the right to object to jurors without giving reasons, the maximum number of peremptory challenging being reduced to three.

Примечания к тексту:

at random – наугад, случайно

peremptory challenging – отвод без указания причины