- •Establishing the importance of the topic:
- •Establishing the importance of the topic (time frame given):
- •Highlighting a problem or controversy in the field of study:
- •Highlighting a knowledge gap in the field of study (for research):
- •Focus and aim:
- •Outline of structure:
- •Explaining Keywords
- •General descriptions of the relevant literature:
- •General reference to previous research/scholarly activity (usually more than one author)
- •Reference to current state of knowledge
- •Reference to single investigations in the past: researcher(s) as sentence subject
- •Reference to single investigations or publications in the past: time frame prominent
- •Reference to single investigations in the past: investigation prominent
- •Reference to single investigations in the past: research topic as subject
- •Reference to what other writers do in their text (author as subject)
- •Reference to other writers' ideas (author as subject)
- •Some ways of introducing quotations
- •Writing about the Past
- •Time phrases associated with the use of the simple past tense (specific times or periods of time in the past completed)
- •Reference to single investigations or publications in the past: simple past tense used
- •Time phrases associated with the use of the present perfect tense (for situations/actions which began in the past and continue up to the present, or for which the period of time is unspecified):
- •The present perfect tense may also be used to describe recent research or scholarly activity with focus on the area of enquiry - usually more than one study
- •Being Critical
- •Introducing questions, problems and limitations (theory)
- •Introducing questions, problems and limitations (method/practice)
- •Identifying a study's weakness:
- •Offering constructive suggestions:
- •Introducing other people's criticisms:
- •Reference to aim/method
- •Location and summary statements:
- •Highlighting significant data in a table/chart
- •Statements of result (positive)
- •Statements of result (negative)
- •Highlighting significant, interesting or surprising results
- •Reporting results from questionnaires and interviews
- •Transition statements
- •Background information (reference to literature or to research aim/question)
- •Statements of result (usually with reference to results section)
- •Unexpected outcome
- •Reference to previous research (support)
- •Reference to previous research (contradict)
- •Explanations for results:
- •Advising cautious interpretation
- •Suggesting general hypotheses
- •Noting implications
- •Commenting on findings
- •Suggestions for future work
- •Writing about the Past
- •Time phrases associated with the use of the simple past tense (specific times or periods of time in the past completed)
- •Reference to single investigations or publications in the past: simple past tense used
- •Time phrases associated with the use of the present perfect tense (for situations/actions which began in the past and continue up to the present, or for which the period of time is unspecified):
- •The present perfect tense may also be used to describe recent research or scholarly activity with focus on the area of enquiry - usually more than one study
Being Critical
As an academic writer, you are expected to be critical of the sources that you use. This essentially means questioning what you read and not necessarily agreeing with it just because the information has been published. Being critical can also mean looking for reasons why we should not just accept something as being correct or true. This can require you to identify problems with a writer's arguments or methods, or perhaps to refer to other people's criticisms of these. Constructive criticism goes beyond this by suggesting ways in which a piece of research or writing could be improved.
...... being against is not enough. We also need to develop habits of constructive thinking. Edward de Bono
click here to see sample text
Introducing questions, problems and limitations (theory)
One question that needs to be asked, however, is whether ...... A serious weakness with this argument, however, is that ...... One of the limitations with this explanation is that it does not explain why... . One criticism of much of the literature on X is that ...... The key problem with this explanation is that ...... The existing accounts fail to resolve the contradiction between X and Y. However, there is an inconsistency with this argument.
Smith's argument relies too heavily on qualitative analysis of ...... It seems that Jones' understanding of the X framework is questionable. Smith's interpretation overlooks much of the historical research ...... One major criticism of Smith's work is that ..... Many writers have challenged Jones' claim on the grounds that .......
Introducing questions, problems and limitations (method/practice)
Another problem with this approach is that it fails to take X into account. Perhaps the most serious disadvantage of this method is that ..... Difficulties arise, however, when an attempt is made to implement the policy. Nevertheless, the strategy has not escaped criticism from governments, agencies and academics. One major drawback of this approach is that ...... The main limitation of biosynthetic incorporation, however, is ...... However, this method of analysis has a number of limitations. However, approaches of this kind carry with them various well known limitations. All the studies reviewed so far, however, suffer from the fact that .......
However, all the previously mentioned methods suffer from some serious |
limitations weaknesses disadvantages drawbacks. |
Identifying a study's weakness:
(However,) |
the main weakness of the study is the failure to address how ....... the study fails to consider the differing categories of damage that ..... the research does not take into account pre-existing ...... such as ...... the author offers no explanation for the distinction between X and Y. Smith makes no attempt to differentiate between various different types of X. Jones fails to fully acknowledge the significance of ...... the paper would appear to be over ambitious in its claims the author overlooks the fact that X contributes to Y. what Smith fails to do is to draw a distinction between ...... another weakness is that we are given no explanantion of how ...... |
