Requirements for independent work of the student

• Students' work with the literature and other sources. The student must be grouped and analyzed the necessary sources and literature, read the relevant publications related to the theme of work.

Requirements to the abstract

The volume of the abstract should be in the range of 6-8 pages long;

In the development of the abstract is recommended 4-5 different sources of text;

The abstract shall be made ​​in compliance with the structure of the presentation;

Course of the presentation shall refer to the literature used.

References should be in the last 5 years.

The structure of the essay should include:

• title page;

• index (consistent presentation abstract sections showing the page from which it begins);

• Introduction (Crystallizing the problem under study, determining the relevance, purpose and objectives of the essay);

• the majority (each section of this part of the essay convincingly reveals a different problem, or one of its sides, is a logical continuation of the previous);

• Conclusion (summarizing or given generalized conclusion on the abstract, with guidance);

• References.

Requirements for presentations.

• The student must abide by a single style, cool background, non-contrast texture on one slide to use no more than 3-4 colors, the use of computer animation, the content should be short, clear.

The criteria and rules for assessing knowledge

• Evaluation of the rating assessments of students made ​​up of monitoring.

  • t - current control = average received a mean value based on the average amount of points for the practical value and the average amount of points for the self-study. 

• Rating admission to the final assessment of the student is at least 60%, so the semester assessment of students in the discipline is given by:

• Final inspection: at the end of the examination subjects in two stages:

Stage 1 - Testing (prepared 176 tests);

Stage 2 - a practical skill, "smears for cervical PCR"

The evaluation criteria for the practical skills: the maximum score – 100

Scoring	% Complete	Score from the traditional system
90-100	90 - 100	fine
89-75	89 - 75	good
74-50	74 - 50	satisfactorily
49 and less	49 - 0	unsatisfactorily

The final grade

I = R х 0,6 + E х 0,4,

I – the final grade

R– evaluation rating of admission

E – evaluation of final control (examination of the discipline)

Rating is 60% of R,

Exam -40% от I

Summarized the assessment of the students in the discipline

Score alphabetic system	Digital equivalent	Points	Score from the traditional system
А	4,0	100	fine
А-	3,67	90-94
В+	3,33	85-89	good
В	3,0	80-84
В-	2,67	75-79
С+	2,33	70-74	satisfactorily
С	2,0	65-69
С-	1,67	60-64
D+	1,33	55-59
D	1,0	50-54
F	0	0-49	unsatisfactorily

Criteria for evaluation of knowledge-based ГОСО РК 5.03.06-2006 «Система образования республики Казахстан. Контроль знаний в высших учебных заведениях» от 26.08.2006г.

1. Knowledge, skills and competencies of students in all types of control are determined by estimates point-lettered rating systems that have a proportional relationship.

2 Rated "excellent" corresponds to an A, which has the digital equivalent of 4.0, and the percentage of 95-100% and A-, which has the digital equivalent of 3.67 and percentage of 90-94%.

This assessment is put in when the student has shown an understanding of programming material and did not allow of any errors, inaccuracies, timely and properly completed tasks, showing the original thinking, on time and without errors homework, doing research work independently using additional scientific literature in the study of the discipline, he was able to organize their own program material.

3. "Good" is graded B +, which has the digital equivalent of 3.33 and percentage of 85-89%, B which has the digital equivalent of 3.0, and the percentage of 80-84% and B-, which has the digital equivalent of 2.67 and percentage content of 75-79%

This assessment is put in when the student has mastered the program material is not lower than 75% and is not a gross error in the response, the timely implementation of the task and gave them no fundamental observations performed correctly and on time has passed without major homework comments use additional literature on teacher direction, engaged in research work, made mistakes or unprincipled principal issues that are fixed by the student, was able to organize the program material with the help of the teacher.

4. "Satisfactory" assessment corresponds to the estimate of C +, which has the digital equivalent of 2.33 and percentage of 70-74%, and C, which has the digital equivalent of 2.0, and the percentage of 65-69%, C-, which has the digital equivalent of 1.67 and percentage content of 60-64%, D +, which has the digital equivalent of 1.33 and percentage of 55-59%, and D, which has the digital equivalent of 1.0, and the percentage of 50-54%.

This assessment is put in when the student has mastered the program material is not less than 50%, the performance of tasks needed by the teacher, not been active in research, only limited academic literature, this teacher, had great difficulties in organizing the material.

5. Evaluation of "unsatisfactory" is graded F, which has the digital equivalent of 0, and the percentage of 0-49%.

This assessment is put in when the student found a gap in the knowledge base material under the program, more than half had not mastered the discipline of the program, the responses made ​​fundamental errors, did not fulfill individual tasks contained in the form of current, intermediate and final control, has not completed all the basic literature provided by the program.