- •The aims of studying the history of the English language. Synchronic and diachronic approaches to studying the language. The concept of ‘language change’.
- •Proto-Indo-European language and comparative linguistics.
- •Proto-Germanic language, its development from Proto-Indo-European.
- •Modern Germanic languages.
- •The earliest descriptions of the Germans, the ancient tribes that spoke Germanic languages.
- •Eastern Germanic, Western Germanic and Northern Germanic groups of languages.
- •The runic alphabet. Old English alphabet and pronunciation.
- •Common phonetic characteristics of the Germanic languages.
- •Grammar characteristics common to the Germanic languages.
- •Changes in the system of vowels in the Germanic languages.
- •Vocabulary
- •Periodisation in the history of the English language, Old English written records.
- •The historical background of Old English.
- •Phonetic processes in Old English (the system of vowels).
- •Independent changes. Development of monophthongs
- •Phonetic processes in Old English (the system of consonants).
- •Velar consonants in Early Old English. Growth of New Phonemes
- •Old English dialects.
- •The nominal system of Old English.
- •The vocabulary and word-building means in Old English.
- •Old English syntax.
- •The verbal system in Old English (grammatical categories).
- •The verbal system in Old English (morphological classification).
- •Economic and social conditions in the 11-12th centuries.
- •The Scandinavian invasions, the Norman Conquest & the way they influenced English.
- •Changes in the alphabet and spelling in Middle English. Middle English written records.
- •Middle English dialects. The London dialect.
- •Phonetic processes in Middle English (the system of vowels).
- •Phonetic processes in Middle English (system of consonants).
- •Changes in the categories of the noun in Middle English.
- •Lecture 2. The phonetical system of the English Language.
- •1. Classification of the English speech sounds.
- •2. The Role of Sound Phenomena in Communication.
- •3. The Syllable as a Phonetic and Phonological Unit.
- •4. Intonation and Prosody.
- •Rhythm and Speech Melody.
- •Problems of phonostylistics.
- •Phonostylistic Characteristics at the Level of Prosodic Features.
- •Timbre.
- •Delimitation.
- •Phonostylistic Characteristics of Conversational Style, Publicistic Style
- •Types of English Pronunciation.
- •American English Pronunciation.
- •Glossary of phonetic terms
- •Lectures 3, 4, 5. The main outline of the Lexicology of the English Language.
- •1. General Problems of the Theory of the Word. The Definition of the Word.
- •The Structure of the Word. Types of Morphemes and their Specific Features.
- •3. Affixation.
- •4. Conversion
- •5. Composition.
- •6. Shortening.
- •7. Back Formation.
- •8. Blending.
- •9. Sound Interchange.
- •10. Stress Interchange.
- •11. Sound Imitation.
- •1. Semasiology as a Branch of Linguistics.
- •2. The Word and its Meaning.
- •Meaning and Referent
- •Functional Approach to Meaning
- •3. Types Of Meaning.
- •Grammatical Meaning
- •Lexical Meaning
- •4. Polysemy of Words.
- •5. The Main Semantic Processes.
- •Synonyms.
- •2. Antonyms.
- •Homonyms.
- •1. Free and Non-Free Word Combinations.
- •2. Classifications of Phraseological Units.
- •3. Synonyms in Phraseology.
- •4. Antonyms in Phraseology.
- •5. Proverbs, Sayings.
- •1. The Native Element and Borrowed Words.
- •3. Criteria of Borrowings in English.
- •4. The Celtic Element in the English Vocabulary.
- •5. The Classical Element in the English Language.
- •8. Various Other Elements in the English Vocabulary.
- •9. False Etymology.
- •10. Types of Borrowings.
- •Ways of Classifying the Vocabulary.
- •Special Literary Vocabulary.
- •3. Special Colloquial Vocabulary.
- •1. The identifying function
- •2. The definitizing function
- •3. The individualizing function
- •Lectures 8, 9. Stylistics of the English Language.
- •3. Stylistic functions of the words having a lexico-stylistic paradigm.
- •3.1. Stylistic functions of literary (high-flown) words.
- •4. Stylistic functions of words having no lexico-stylistic paradigm.
- •5. Stylistic functions of phraseology.
- •2. Stylistic morphology of the english language.
- •2.1. Sd based on the use of nouns.
- •2.2. Sd based on the use of articles.
- •2.3. Sd based on the use of adjectives.
- •2.4. Sd based on the use of pronouns.
- •2.5. Sd based on the use of adverbs.
- •Alliteration;
- •Assonance;
- •Onomatopoeia.
- •2.6. Sd based on the use of verbs.
- •1. Phonetic means of stylistics.
- •2. Expressive means of english syntax.
- •3. Syntactical stylistic devices.
- •3. Figures of qualification.
- •3. Figures of opposition.
3. Figures of opposition.
This group of semasiological SD is characterised by the combination in context of two or more words or word-groups with opposite meanings. Their relations are either objectively opposite or are interpreted as such by the speaker. Here we refer antithesis and oxymoron.
Antithesis (Greek - opposition) is a stylistic device which presents two contrasting ideas in close proximity in order to stress the contrast. There are several variants of antithesis based on different relations of the ideas expressed:
opposition of features possessed by the same referent, e.g. Some people have much to live on, and little to live for (O.Wiide);
opposition of two or more different referents having contrasting features, e.g. Their pre-money wives did not go together with their post-money daughters (E.Hemingway);
opposition of referents having not only contrasting features but embracing a wider range of features, e.g. New England had a native literature , while Virginia had none; numerous industries, while Virginia was all agricultural (Th.Dreiser).
Antithesis often goes along with other stylistic figures: anaphoric repetition, parallelism, chiasmus, in particular. It is widely used in all kinds of speech: fiction, publicistic, scientific and colloquial English. It performs various stylistic functions: stressing the contrast and rhythmically organising the utterance. Due to the last quality antithesis is widely used in poetry in combination with anaphora, epiphora, and alliteration.
Oxymoron - (Greek: oxymoron - witty - foolish) is also a combination of opposite meanings which exclude each other. But in this case, the two semantically contrasting ideas are expressed by syntactically interdependent words (in predicative, attributive or adverbial phrases), e.g. He was certain the whites could easily detect his adoring hatred to them (R.Wright).
Oxymoron reveals the contradictory sides of one and the same phenomenon. One of its elements discloses some objectively existing feature while the other serves to convey the author's personal attitude towards this quality (pleasantly ugly, crowded loneliness, unanswerable reply). Such semantic incompatibility does not only create unexpected combinations of words, violating the existing norms of compatibility, but reveals some unexpected qualities of the denotatum as well.
As soon as an oxymoron gets into circulation, it loses its stylistic value, becoming trite: pretty bad, awfully nice, terribly good.
Original oxymorons are created by the authors to make the utterance emotionally charged, vivid, and fresh, e.g. Oh brawling love! Oh loving hate! Oh heavy lightness! Serious vanity! Feather of lead, bright smoke, cold fire, sick health! (W.Shakespeare).
4. FIGURES OF INEQUALITY.
Relations of inequality are the relations of meanings of words and word-combinations which differ in their emotive intensiveness or logical importance. To this group we refer:
figures based on actualising the emotional power of the utterance (climax or anticlimax);
figures based on two different meanings of words and word-combinations (pun, zeugma).
Climax or gradation (Latin: gradatio - gradualness; Greek: climax - a ladder) is a structure in which every successive word, phrase, or sentence is emotionally stronger or logically more important than the preceding one, e.g. Like a well, like a vault, like a tomb, the prison had no knowledge of the brightness outside (Ch.Dickens).
There are three types of climax:
the arrangement of some lexical units characterising the object in the same emotional direction, e.g. As he wondered and wondered what to do, he first rejected a stop as impossible, then as improbable, then as quite dreadful (W.S.Gilbert);
the arrangement of lexical units with logical widening of notions, e.g. For that one instant there was no one else in the room, in the house, in the world, besides themselves (M.Wilson);
emphatic repetition and enumeration, e.g. Of course it is important. Incredibly urgently, desperately important (D.Sayers).
Gradation is widely used in fiction and the publicistic style. It is one of the main means of emotional and logical influence of a text upon the reader and listener.
Anticlimax presents a structure in which every successive word, phrase, or sentence is emotionally or logically less strong than the preceding one, e.g. Fledgeby hasn't heard anything. "No, there's not a word of news," says Lammle. "Not a particle," adds Boots. "Not an atom," chimes in Brewer (Ch. Dickens).
We can distinguish two types of anticlimax:
gradual drop in intensity;
sudden break in emotive power. In this case, emotive and logical importance is accumulated only to be unexpectedly brought up to a sudden break, e.g. He was unconsolable - for an afternoon (J.Galsworthy).
Anticlimax is mostly used as a means of achieving a humorous effect. Pun is a device based on polysemy, homonymy, or phonetic similarity to achieve a humorous effect.
There are several kinds of pun:
puns based on polysemy. They had the appearance of men to whom life had appeared as a reversible coat - seamy on both sides. (O.Henry)
puns based on complete or partial homonymy: Diner: Is it customary to tip a waiter in this restaurant? Waiter: Why-ah-yes, sir.
Diner: Then hand me a tip. I've waited three quarters of an hour.
3) puns based on phonetic similarity:
I've spent last summer in a very pretty city of Switzerland.
Berne?
No, I almost froze.
Pun is used for satirical and humorous purposes. Many jokes are based on puns.
Zeugma (Greek: zeugyana — to join, to combine) are parallel constructions with unparallel meanings. It is such a structural arrangement of an utterance in which the basic component is both a part of a phraseological unit and of a free word-combination. So, zeugma is a simultaneous realisation within the same short context of two meanings of a polysemantic unit. e.g. If the country doesn't go to the dogs or the Radicals, we shall have you Prime Minister some day (O.Wilde). The verb "to go" here realises two meanings: to go to the dogs (to perish) and to go to the Radicals (to become politically radical).
Zeugma combines syntactical and lexical characteristics. Syntactically, it is based on similar structures, semantically it comprises different meanings, which leads to logical and semantic incompatibility. Zeugma is mainly a means of creating a humorous effect.
Л.П. Єфімов Стилістика англійської мови. – Вінниця: Нова книга, 2004. – 239 c. |
||
Expressive means of a language are those phonetic, lexical, morphological and syntactic units and forms which make speech emphatic. Introduce connotational (stylistic, non-denotative) meanings into utterances. Stylistic devices (tropes, figures of speech) are not language phenomena. They are formed in speech and most of them don`t exist out of context. Are grouped into phonetic, lexico-semantic and syntactic types. Phonetic EM and SD: rhythm, alliteration, assonance, onomatopoeia. Lexico-semantic EM and SD (Figures of Substitution): Figures of Quantity (hyperbole, meiosis, litotes), Figures of Quality (metonymy, synecdoche, periphrasis, euphemism; metaphor, epithet, antonomasia, personification; irony). Figures of Combination: Figures of identity (simile, synonyms); Figures of contrast (oxymoron, antithesis); Figures of inequality (climax, anticlimax, zeugma, pun). Syntactic EM and SD: Reduction of the s-ce model (ellipsis, nominative s-ce, aposiopesis, asyndeton, parceling); Extension of the s-ce model (repetition, enumeration, tautology, polysyndeton, parallelism); Change of word-order (inversion, detachment); Transposition of s-ce meaning (rhetoric questions and other variants). Stylistic Lexicology Stylistic Lexicology deals with words which make up people`s lexicon. The majority of English words are:
Morphological Stylistics The main notion is the transposition – a divergence between the traditional usage of a neutral word and its situational / stylistic usage. Morpholoigical EM`s and SD`s:
Phonetic and Graphic EM`s & SD`s.
Stylistic semasiology. Lexico-semantic SD`s. Figures of Substitution: 1. Figures of Quantity (hyperbole, meiosis, litotes), 2. Figures of Quality (metonymy, synecdoche, periphrasis, euphemism; metaphor, epithet, antonomasia, personification; irony).
Stylistic semasiology: Figures of Combination: 1. Figures of identity (simile, synonyms); 2. Figures of contrast (oxymoron, antithesis); 3. Figures of inequality (climax, anticlimax, zeugma, pun).
Stylistic syntax Syntactic SD: 1. Reduction of the s-ce model (ellipsis, nominative s-ce, aposiopesis, asyndeton, parceling); 2. Extension of the s-ce model (repetition, enumeration, tautology, polysyndeton, parallelism); 3. Change of word-order (inversion, detachment); 4. Transposition of s-ce meaning (rhetoric questions and other variants).
|
||
V.A.Kukharenko A Book of Practice in Stylistics.-V.:Nova Knyha,2003.-p.117-119. |
Ю.М. Скребнев Основы стилистики английского языка. Учебник для вузов. – М.: Астрель, АСТ, 2003. – С. 7; 77 – 120. |
Л.П. Єфімов Стилістика англійської мови. – Вінниця: Нова книга, 2004. – C. 17 – 23. |
Functional styles:
|
K.A.Dolinin Stylistics of the French Language:
The speech is characterized by the positive or negative distinctive features that presuppose it`s subdivision into emotional, spontaneous, normative. Types of speech:
|
Functional Styles are classified into bookish and colloquial. The group of bookish styles: the style of official documents, the style of scientific prose, the newspaper style, the publicistic style, the belletristic style. The group of colloquial style: the literary colloquial style, the informal colloquial style, the substandard speech style. The style of official documents aims at establishing, developing, controlling business relations. It`s impersonal, rational, pragmatic; It`s characterized by the usage of capital letters, abbreviations, the domination of bookish, borrowed, archaic words, professional terms, clichés (aviso, interest-free, status quo). The style of scientific prose serves as an important for promoting scientific ideas and exchanging scientific information among people. It`s characterized by the usage of the developed system of headlines, ttles, subtitles, footnotes, pictures, tables, schemes, formulae, the special terms of international origin. The usage of the scientific “we” – “the plural of modesty” in the meaning of “I”. The newspaper style aims to inform people about all kinds of events and occurrences which may be of some interest to them. It`s characterized by the usage the neutral common literary words, political / economic / social terms, borrowings, clichés. The publicistic style falls into the oratory style (speeches, lectures, reports), the style of radio and TV programmes, the style of essays and articles. The main feature is the direct contact with the audience. The belletristic style – the style of books full of EM`s and SD`s, it embraces prose, drama, poetry. The colloquial style complies with the regularities and norms of oral communication. The vocabulary – neutral, bookish, literary words, exotic words, colloquialisms, vulgar words, slang, dialects. |
STYLISTIC DIFFERENTIATION OF MODERN ENGLISH.
1. Stylistics analyses language from the functional point of view. That is why defining the notion of "function", its differentiation from the notion "aim" seems to be an essential starting point.
Speech activity, as any other human activity, is predetermined and conditioned by human needs and aims. The aim of human activity is a certain conceivable practical result which is considered to be desirable. Two types of hierarchically related aims should be distinguished: the main aim and the intermediate one, the latter presupposes creating and applying definite means of achieving the main aim. The main aim of verbal communication is of pragmatic (non-lingual) character, while the intermediate aim is of constructive (lingual) character. Commonly, the aim of communication is said to consist in conveying information, but it is not quite correct. Whenever the speaker intends to say something he intends to change either the psychological and mental state of the hearer or his physical state. To achieve this aim the speaker should first set a constructive (lingual) aim, i.e. constructing an utterance (a text) which is the most suitable for attaining the pragmatic aim in a concrete speech situation.
Function is usually defined either as a relation of one element to another or as a role of an element in a system as well as a role of the whole system in wider environment.
As modern linguistics distinguishes three areas of language, namely, language system (langue), speech activity (performance) and speech material (speech, parole), the notion of function has certain peculiarities when applied to each of these areas. Accordingly, three types of stylistics may be distinguished; stylistics of language, stylistics of speech activity, and stylistics of speech.
2. Language, being a system by itself, is part of other system of a higher order - language and reality, language and thinking, language and society. In relation to reality, thinking and society, language has two main functions - communicative and cognitive. These functions predetermine the properties of both language system and its components.
stylistics of language does not only cover the system of expressive means but also all language means which are used for nomination and communication.
As language is closely related to thinking, which may be logical and imaginative, at the very early stages of its development it developed two related subsystems - the practical language and the poetic language having different structural and functional organisation.
Each of the two subsystems first existed in the oral forms only. Much later, the written form came into being. Written language was used for specific purposes and became a type of language with its formal, structural, and semantic peculiarities, it is known as a bookish language. The oral language also became a type of language with its formal, structural, and semantic peculiarities, too. It is known as a conversational language.
The main unit of written language is the text, whereas that of oral type is the utterance. They differ in many respects: in substance, in functions, and in their norms.
Practical oral, practical written, poetic oral and poetic written subsystems can be defined as functional types of language. They constitute the basis for the stylistic differentiation of speech activity and speech.
3. The notion of functional style is interpreted in stylistics differently. There are two main approaches to its definition, both originating from Ac. V.V.Vinogradov's conception. According to the first approach, style is defined on the criterion of function as a socially accepted, functionally conditioned and internally organised system of the ways of usage, choice and combination of communicative verbal means which correlate with other similar systems serving other aims and fulfilling other functions in speech practice of a nation. According to the second approach style is defined with regard to its components. It is regarded as a system of language means united by the similarity of their function or by the sphere of usage.
Our interpretation of functional style somewhat differs from those mentioned above.
Any human activity, speech activity including, presupposes the existence of means or tools of such activity as well as devices or ways of using these means. As human activity is always purposeful, both means and devices are functionally oriented. So, if function is a role of units, style is their property. We are to distinguish styles as the properties of speech activity from styles as the properties of speech.
We define the speech functional style as a socially accepted stereotype of speech behaviour closely connected with human social activity. These stereotypes are sets of norms and rules for generating utterances and texts together with the means and devices supplied by the language system for achieving various pragmatic aims. A functional style carries information about the speaker: the social role he has assumed, his social status, his psychological state, and his attitude to the hearer as well as to the subject-matter of speech. Its meaningfulness is a result of the speaker's choice of a certain manner of speech behaviour from the existing accepted stereotypes.
The choice of a stereotype is conditioned by many factors, the main of which are as follows: a) social roles (social relations) of the communicants, which may be equal and non-equal; b) social situation of communication, which may be formal and informal; c) pragmatic aims of the communicants. These factors do not exclude the influence of a personal factor, the factor of the author's or the speaker's personality.
4. The problem of functional style classification is also very complicated. There are two approaches to it: deductive (from the general to the specific) and inductive (from the specific to the general). But, irrespective of the approaches adopted, scholars usually distinguish the following styles; conversational, publicistic and oratorical, official, scientific, newspaper style, and belles-lettres style.
The status of some of these styles seems refutable. Following the differentiation of the primary and secondary semiotic systems we assume that the poetic language, the language of fiction does not constitute a functional style comparable with other functional styles but it constitutes a functional type of language. Literary texts are objects of art which have their own specific structures whose functions differ in many respects from those of practical texts and utterances.
The status of the newspaper style is also doubtful. Some scholars consider that the existence of this style is conditioned by the specific aims of mass media and by the peculiarities of the linguistic means used in newspapers. But these peculiarities are confined to very limited newspaper units - headlines, brief news items and editorials Thus, it is more reasonable to speak about the newspaper language rather than about the newspaper style.
I.R.Galperin excludes conversational style from the inventory of functional styles, because his classification was based entirely on the written type of language. Though conversational style is used even more widely than written language and is not homogeneous at all.
The following speech functional styles can be distinguished:
Official style is based on the practical language and is absolutely impersonal. It is used in formal situations with the social roles of the communicants being equal or non-equal.
Scientific style is mainly based on the practical language, being mostly impersonal. It may include elements of the poetic language. The criteria of social situation and social roles are irrelevant for it.
Publicistic (oratorical) style is mainly based on the practical language, being personal. It may widely employ elements of the poetic language.
Literary conversational style is mainly based on the practical language. Mostly it widely employs elements of the poetic language. It is used in formal situations, where social roles of the communicants may be equal or non-equal.
Colloquial style is based on the practical language, though also employs elements of the poetic language. It is used in informal situations where the social roles of the communicants are as a rule equal.
5. A certain manner of behaviour results in the fact that the product of this activity -utterances and texts - have certain structural and semantic properties. These properties are the subject-matter of stylistics of speech.
Utterances and texts having similar or different semantic and structural properties conditioned by functional styles, they may be classified according to semantic and structural criteria. On the basis of these criteria, three major classes of texts hierarchically related to one another can be distinguished:
types of the texts. These are different classes of texts within a functional style which differ in their semantic and thematic characteristics. Thus, texts of official style may be subdivided into administrative, judicial, military, commercial, diplomatic etc;
genres of the texts. These are types of texts further subdivided according to their compositional and stylistic peculiarities. Thus, military texts are divided into orders, reports, instructions, regulations etc;
individual texts, mostly influenced by the author's personality. The study of such texts constitutes the subject-matter of stylistics of individual speech.
