- •Give a definition of science. Open the three values of science.
- •2. Name the criteria (features) scientific. Determine each criterion.
- •3. Expand the example of your own science structure of scientific knowledge.
- •4. Define the object and subject of research. Open these concepts as an example of your science.
- •5. Show the difference between the scientific and religious world view as the two ways of perceiving the world.
- •6. Specify the differences between science and art as the two ways of knowing.
- •7.Formulate the concept of ‘scientism’ and ‘anti-scientism’. Arguments each of them.
- •8. Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •Identify the difference between externalism and internalism in science. Give examples of each.
- •9. Evaluate the unity and specify the differences between philosophy and science as two forms of rationality.
- •10. Expand the concept "quantifier of existence".
- •11. Display the fundamental differences between scientific, anti-scientific and extra-scientific knowledge.
- •12. A comparative analysis of the concepts: information, knowledge, wisdom.
- •13. Explain the three tasks of science.
- •14. Expand the 5 points of view on the problem of the beginning of science. Explain your position on this issue.
- •15.Explain the concept of verification and falsification in the science.
- •16 Name and define the form of non-scientific knowledge. Give examples of each.
- •17. Specify the main problems described in the text "Science without hope."
- •18. Determine the ability of the productive imagination.
- •19. Give your assessment of the text ‘The phenomenon of alternative science’.
- •20. Illustrate the essence of quasi-science and para-science.
- •21. Open the myths of your science.
- •22. Analyze "outstanding issues" of your science.
- •23. Define the concept of ‘knowledge’. Name the three characteristics of knowledge.
- •24. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Knowledge".
- •25. Define the essence of thinking and show how it differs from the mind (intellect).
- •26.Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •27. Formulate and expand the scientific ideas and the main program of Antiquity.
- •Identify and expand the main features pre-science.
- •28. Expand the paradigm of ancient science.
- •29. Evaluate the major achievements of science in the Middle Ages (Europe and the Arab East).
- •31.Formulate discoveries and personalities in classical science.
- •32. Formulate and expand the main ideas and principles of classical science.
- •33. Expand the paradigm of classical science.
- •34. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of non-classical science.
- •35. Name and expand the main ideas and principles of the post-non-classical science.
- •36. Make the analysis of the socio-cultural environment of Kazakhstan science (5 parameters).
- •37. Give your assessment of the intellectual level of the Kazakhstan society.
- •38. Please rate the prestige of Kazakhstan science and formulate your recommendations on this issue.
- •39. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic ‘Planet earth’. The Solar Nebular Hypothesis
- •A Cloud of Gas
- •Sun Formation
- •Planet and Asteroid Formation
- •40. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Mind & Body"
- •41. Describe the content of the videotext "Agora" and formulate your conclusions on it.
- •42. Evaluate the main issues and features an ancient science in videotext "Agora".
- •43. Expand the content of the videotext "a Beautiful Mind" and make your own conclusions on it.
- •44. Consider the problem of creativity and personality of the scientist in videotext "a Beautiful Mind."
- •45. Show in the context of the video-text "a Beautiful Mind" and other examples of the difference of genius and talent in science.
- •46. Make a glossary of basic scientific ideas and concepts in videotext "Interstellar"
- •47. Describe the content of the videotext ‘Interstellar’ and formulate your conclusion on it.
- •48. Determine the nature of scientific creativity. Formulate the paradox of creativity. Evaluate the role of intuition in scientific discovery.
- •49. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Universe"
- •Inflation
- •Inflation
- •50. Consider the main ideas, hypotheses and theories on the topic "Human Evolution".
42. Evaluate the main issues and features an ancient science in videotext "Agora".
Antique science has not been able to develop theoretical natural science and its technological applications. The reason is cheap slave labor did not create the necessary incentives for the development of a solid technique and technologies, and it and serving it natural scientific and engineering expertise Gipatiiis credited with the words: "think better and make mistakes, than not to think at all. The worst thing is the present superstition as truth. "
The most important result of the democratization of socio-political spheres of ancient Greece was the formation of the apparatus of logical rationale, which has turned into a tool for broadcasting knowledge from the individual in society. Against this background, could already be folded science as demonstrative knowledge "from the ground", that easily illustrate accessing the actual material.
Sharply negative attitude is known to Greeks to Eastern Science, stereotypically for utility. In Greece, the process of science can be reconstructed as follows. Arithmetic and geometry function as a set of techniques in zemlemernoj practice, falling under the techne. In other words, in Greece, as in the ancient East, they were not:
1) deployed a text decoration
2) strict rational-logical justification.
For example, in the design of mathematics texts in the form of the theoretic-logical system you need to stress the role of Thales and Democritus, perhaps. Speaking of which, of course, it is impossible to ignore, on a text which cultivate Pythagoreans through mathematical view as purely abstract, as well as jeleatov, was first made in math had not previously adopted by it the demarcation of sensual from umopostigaemogo. All this constituted the Foundation of the formation of mathematics as a theoretical-rational science, rather than jempiriko-sensual art.
So, initially, unscientific, unjustified differed from the ancient Oriental, empirical mathematical knowledge of the ancient Greeks, being streamlined and, being a theoretical processing, logical systemization, deduktivizacii, turned into a science. The Greeks was alien to the experienced pilot type of knowledge: 1) undivided rule of contemplation; 2) idiosyncrasy to individual "minor" actions deemed unworthy of intellectuals — free citizens of democratic policies and unsuitable for knowledge neraschlenimogo on a part of the world.
43. Expand the content of the videotext "a Beautiful Mind" and make your own conclusions on it.
John Forbes Nash mathematics genius, he at the dawn of his career made a titanic work in the field of game theory, which virtually turned this section of mathematics and almost brought him international fame.
However, literally at the same time arrogant and enjoys success among women who gets hit, Nash turns already his own life: doctors put him diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.
Biographical drama by Ron Howard from his book c. Nazar, tells about the life of John Forbes Nash, a Nobel Laureate in economics. The film won four Oscars for best film, adapted screenplay, directing and supporting actress.
The story begins with the early years of the young genius John Nash. He starts to develop paranoid schizophrenia, accompanied by hallucinations, and progresses until it endangers his work and relationship with his wife and friends.
Once John has drawn some Parcher agent offering to work on the Special Division of the CIA. Its task is to analyse the information published in open sources, to find it. This is the data exchanged between the conspirators — enemies of the United States. Their reports Nash leaves in a mailbox at an agreed place. During one of his visits to the mailbox Nash is attacked by the conspirators and miraculously escapes death.
Soon it turns out that all of the work for the CIA is merely a figment of his imagination.
Only after years of struggle he manages to defeat his illness and finally get the deserved the Nobel Prize.
