- •М инистерство образования и науки российской федерации
- •© Издательский центр юУрГу, 2014 unit 1
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •Court system
- •Grammar Exercises Types of Questions
- •Court systems of uk and usa
- •Courts in great britain
- •House of Lords
- •United states courts
- •Understanding the levels of us federal courts
- •Grammar Exercises Time Tenses
- •Interrogation:
- •The jury
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •The jury
- •Dialogue
- •Jury service – an important job and experience
- •Court etiquette
- •The rules and language of the courtroom
- •Grammar Exercises Time Tenses
- •Modern crimes
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •Victim: _______________________________________________________
- •Incident type: __________________________________________________
- •If items were stolen, list them _____________________________________
- •Classifications of crimes
- •Elements of a Crime
- •Crime in russia
- •Modern Crimes
- •Grammar Exercises
- •Daring Raid at Local Hotel
- •Crimes and punishment
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Below is a range of sentences that may be imposed. Work in pairs and match each sentence to its definition. Then ask a partner a definition for him(her) to guess.
- •Dialogue
- •Vocabulary:
- •The Sentence of the Court is …
- •Grammar Exercises Modals
- •Civil procedure
- •Capital punishment: pros and cons
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •From the history of punishment
- •Grammar Exercises Reported Speech
- •Organized crimes
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •Organized crime groups
- •Grammar Exercises
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •Want to be a forensic scientist?
- •Types of evidence
- •Physical and biological evidence
- •Fbi Biometric Center of Excellence
- •Grammar Exercises Relative Pronouns
- •Insert who/ whom/ whose/ which/ that/ where or nothing if possible and translate the sentences:
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue at the police station
- •Facial features
- •Read the text and render its context in 3-5 sentences; say what its main idea is.
- •Interviewing a witness
- •Do you trust your witness?
- •Identification in police investigation
- •Grammar
- •Imperatives
- •Miranda warning
- •Gerund Complex (Герундиальная конструкция)
- •Human rights and police
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •European platform for policing and human rights
- •Grammar Exercises Conditional Sentences
- •British police
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •A Detective
- •Police officers
- •Prepare an annotation of the text.
- •Fill the gaps with the words from the box; read and translate the text.
- •Grammar Exercises
- •The us police
- •Early Police in the United States
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogues
- •The Trooper Pledge
- •Visit any police department website and make a presentation using the tips given below:
- •Grammar Exercises
- •Law enforcement in the usa
- •International cooperation unternational law
- •Vocabulary and Speech Exercises
- •Dialogue
- •International law
- •Sources of International Law
- •International court of justice
- •Interpol
- •Washington, dc. – fbi hq, 10 a.M.
- •Grammar Exercises Abbreviations
- •Visit the websites of the fbi, Interpol, Europol and make up your own list of abbreviations they use. Грамматический справочник General Questions (Yes/No Questions)
- •Special Questions (Wh-Questions)
- •Tag Questions
- •Видо-временная система английского глагола
- •Условные обозначения, используемые в таблице:
- •Группа времен Simple (Indefinite)
- •Случаи употребления the Past Simple (Indefinite) Tense
- •Группа времен Perfect
- •Группа времен Perfect Continuous
- •Случаи употребления the Present Perfect Continuous Tense
- •Случаи употребления the Past Perfect Continuous Tense
- •Случаи употребления the Future Perfect Continuous Tense
- •Страдательный залог (The Passive Voice)
- •Образование времен страдательного залога
- •Модальные глаголы (Modal Verbs)
- •Употребление модальных глаголов с инфинитивом в форме Perfect
- •Косвенная речь (Reported Speech)
- •Согласование времен (Sequence of Tenses)
- •Неличные формы глагола (Non-finite verbs или Verbals)
- •Функции причастия I в предложении
- •Относительные местоимения. Определительные придаточные предложения (Relative Pronouns. Relative Clauses)
- •Условные предложения (Conditional Sentences)
- •Аббревиатура
- •Introducing a point of view
Types of evidence
Evidence is something which can be used to demonstrate the truth of an assertion. It can take the form of a person’s testament, an object or a document. In order for evidence to be admissible, it needs to be relevant, material and competent.
To be relevant, evidence must serve to make an assertion more or less probable. Evidence is material if it has a significant relationship with the issues in a case. Competent evidence is reliable. Foundation evidence is that which shows that these prerequisites of admissibility have been met.
There are four types of evidence: real, demonstrative, testimonial and documentary.
Real evidence is usually an object which was involved in the case. To be admissible, real evidence must be authenticated, either by identification or by establishing a chain of custody.
Demonstrative evidence illustrates the testimony of a witness. It may include maps or diagrams. It is authenticated by the witness himself.
Documentary evidence is similar to real evidence. Typically, it includes contracts or other forms. It, too, must be authenticated by a witness.
Testimonial evidence is an oral or written assertion offered as proof of the truth. This type of evidence does not require foundation evidence as a prerequisite for its admissibility.
Why is evidence important during a trial?
What are some items that can be used as evidence in a trial?
What are four types of evidence?
What does evidence need to be in order to be admitted to the court?
Translate the words in bold
Read the text once more and complete the table:
Relevant Evidence |
|
|
|
Has a significant relationship with the case |
Competent Evidence |
|
|
|
An object involved in a case |
Demonstrative Evidence |
Illustrates the testimony of a witness |
|
|
Includes contracts and forms |
Testimonial evidence |
|
Foundation evidence |
Shows that prerequisites are met |
Match the words (1-7) with the definitions (a-g):
1 – assertion
2 – evidence
3 – testament
4 – chain of custody
5 – authenticated
6 – prerequisites
7 – admissible
something that is needed in order to continue
being allowed in court
a sigh or proof of why something is true
a personal account
proven to be the original item
a statement someone believes is true
the processing of evidence from its collection to presentation in court
Write a word that is similar in meaning to the underlined part
Do you have items which show an assertion is true?
_e_ _ e _ _ _ _ _ c _
Get the contacts and forms that show an assertion is true.
d _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Not all of the evidence is making the case more or less probable.
_ e _ _ _ _ _ t
Is the witness’s testimony reliable enough to be accepted by a court?
c _ _ p _ _ _ _ _
Two people will give their personal account as proof of the truth.
_e s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e_ _ _ _ _ _ _
The evidence is significant with regards to its relationship to the case.
_ a _ _ _ _ _ l
The witness authenticated some maps and diagrams which illustrate his statement.
_ _ _ o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Listen to a conversation between two lawyers and choose the correct answer.
-
1. Which type of evidence is NOT mentioned?
A documentary evidence
B real evidence
C demonstrative evidence
D testimonial evidence
2. Why isn’t Ms. Chambers’s testimony admissible?
A It isn’t relevant.
B It isn’t material.
C It isn’t competent.
D It isn’t truthful.
VI. Listen again and complete the conversation.
Lawyer 1: Let’s go over the 1 ______ we have for the Soames case.
Lawyer 2: Okay, good idea. I guess we ought to start with the real evidence; the gun Soames used for the 2 ______.
Lawyer 1: I spoke to Detective Meeks this morning. He faxed me the 3 ______ showing the chain of custody.
Lawyer 2: Everything was handled properly, right?
Lawyer 1: Yes, there should be no reason why the pistol wouldn’t be 4 _______ as evidence.
Lawyer 2: Good. Is there any 5 _______ evidence for the case?
Lawyer 1: Yes, we have the videotapes from the bank’s 6 _______ ________.
Lawyer 2: I assume they’re relevant?
Lawyer 1: Absolutely! The entire robbery was caught on video.
Lawyer 2: Really? You can’t beat that for 7 _______ ________. What’s next?
VII. Act out the roles below based on Task VI with a partner. Then, switch roles.
Use language such as: I spoke to … this morning. Everything was handled properly, right? I assume they’re relevant? |
|
Student A: You are a lawyer. Discuss with Student B:
|
Student B: You are a lawyer. Discuss evidence for a bank robbery case with Student A. |
Give a sight translation of the text
