- •The Syntactic Field of a Sentence.
- •Act of Locution: He said to me “Entertain her!” Act of Illocution: He urged (or advised, ordered, etc) me to entertain her. Act of Perlocution: He persuaded me to entertain her.
- •In which illocutionary acts differ one from another.
- •C ↑ I (s does a)
- •1. Student X: Let's go to the movies tonight.
- •2. Student y: I have to study for an exam.
- •6. I have to tie my shoes.
- •7. I have to study for an exam, but let's go to the movies anyhow or;
- •8. I have to study for an exam, but I'll do it when we get home from the movies.
- •1) I apologize for stepping on your toe.
- •I congratulate you on winning the race.
- •In general the form of these is __________________________________.
- •Task 4. Study Reference Notes 1 and 2 and discuss the Maxims by Paul Grice and the Politeness Maxims by Geoffrey Leech. What is in common and what are the differences?
- •Reference Notes 1
- •2Paul Grice. Maxims
- •The Tact maxim
- •The Generosity maxim
- •The Approbation maxim
- •The Agreement maxim
- •The Sympathy maxim
- •Illocutionary Verbs vs Illocutionary Acts
- •Some sentences "conventionally" used in the
- •3Could you be a little more quiet?
- •4You could be a little more quiet
- •4.1.1.1.1.1Are you able to reach the book on the top shelf?
- •5You ought to be more polite to your mother
- •6You should leave immediately
- •7Would you mind awfully if I asked you if you could write me a letter of recommendation?
- •Some sentences "conventionally" used in the
- •III. Sentences concerning the propositional content
- •8Give definitions of locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts of speech.
- •Means of substitution and their analysis.
- •“In that instant Hartley was gone, rushing out of the kitchen, not towards the front door, but out of the back door, straight onto the grass and onto the rocks”.
- •Example 1
- •Example 2
- •Example 3
- •Structural features of extrinsic modality
- •Structural features of intrinsic modality
- •In which of these types of discourse modal verbs are used mostly in their epistemic / deontic meaning?
- •Criteria Used to Qualify a Written Text as a Discourse.
- •3. Historical Backgrounds of Discourse Analysis
- •4. Dimensions of Discourse and Fields of Discourse Studies
- •Stylistics
- •Rhétoric
- •Discourse Pragmatics
- •5. Conversation Analysis
- •6. Discourse Grammar
- •7. The Future of Discourse Studies
- •2. Analysis of Written Discourse
- •Approaches to Cohesion and Rhetorical Structure Analysis
- •4. Forms of Cohesion
- •5. Approaches to Register and Genre Analysis
- •Speech and Discourse Communities
- •7. New Literacy Studies
- •I. Information Packaging
- •1.2. Cohesive texts: topic comes before comment
- •1.3. Front-focus: initial position for extra focus
- •Discourse Strategies
- •Passives – creating new subjects
- •Different semantic types as subjects
- •Existentials
- •III. Focus Strategies
- •3.1. Cleft constructions
- •3.2.Fronting
- •3.3.Left-dislocation
- •3.4. Right-dislocation
- •Methods of Studying Discourse Processing
- •Theoretical Approaches to Discourse Processing
- •1.2.1. Construction-Integration Model
- •1.2.2. Structure-Building Framework
- •1.2.3. Event-Indexing Model
- •1.2.4. Memory-Based Approach
- •1.3. Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Discourse Processing
- •1.3.1. Integrating Sentences into a Coherent Discourse
- •1.3.2. Generating Inferences during Discourse Processing
- •1.3.3. Determining Reference in Discourse Processing
- •II. Elements Supporting Discourse: Discourse Markers
- •2.1. The Conversational Approach
- •2.2. The Grammatico-Syntactic Approach
- •2.3. The Discourse-Cognitive Approach
7. I have to study for an exam, but let's go to the movies anyhow or;
8. I have to study for an exam, but I'll do it when we get home from the movies.
The inferential strategy is to establish, first, that the primary illocutionary point departs from the literal, and second, what the primary illocutionary point is.
Task 7. Read the dialogues and then consider any of the cases of indirect speech act analysis. Use Reference Notes 3 and the example case in Task 5 as the scheme for your analysis.
1. Cornelius walked a lot that day, he didn’t want to visit the auction, to look how all those things of his would be sold. He unlocked the front door as the clock on the nearby church struck three. The phone began to ring just as he entered the room. Cornelius picked up the phone to hear Frank’s voice on the other side of the line.
“Did you remember to withdraw the chess set from the afternoon sale?” Frank asked, without bothering with any formalities.
“What are you talking about?” said Cornelius.
(by Jeffrey Archer)
2. Bill looked up as Henry approached the bar.
“I thought you had a visiting Minister to take care of today?”
“His plane doesn’t land until 3:30,” Henry said. “I dropped by because I wanted to have a word with you.”
(by Jeffrey Archer)
Step 1: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 2: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 3: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 4: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 5: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 6: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 7: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 8: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 9: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Step 10: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SEMINAR III.
Speech Acts: Some Syntactical Aspects of the Classification.
Now we will examine the deep structure of explicit performative sentences, that is, the syntactical structure of sentences containing the performative occurrence of appropriate illocutionary verbs.
Task 1. Reconstruct the deep structure of the following types of speech acts. The first is done for you.
Assertives. The deep structure of such paradigm assertive sentences as "I state that it is raining" and "I predict he will come" is simply I + verb+(that) + S. This class, as a class, provides no further constraints; though particular verbs may provide further constraints. For example, "predict" requires that an Aux in the lower S must be future or, at any rate, cannot be past.
Directives. "I order you to leave" is thus the surface structure realization of "I order you + you will leave" with equivalent NP deletion of the repeated "you".
Thus, such sentences as "I order you to leave" and "I command you to stand at attention" have the following deep structure: _____________________________
Verbs, having directive syntax, are:
the paradigm directive verbs "____", "__________", and "___________";
"invite" and "advise" (in one of its senses);
"permit" also has the syntax of directives, though giving permission is not trying to get someone to do something, rather it consists in removing antecedently existing restrictions on his doing it;
"dare", "defy", and "challenge" (Austin included them with "apologize", "thank", "congratulate", etc.).
Commissives.
1) "I promise to pay you the money", is the surface structure realization of _________________________________. Thus, such sentences as "I promise (you) to pay you the money", and "I pledge allegiance to the flag", and "I vow to get revenge", have the deep structure
____________________________________. (1)
We hear the difference in syntax between
"I promise you to come on Wednesday" = _____________________;
and b. "I order you to come on Wednesday" = _______________________.
2) Not all of the paradigm commissives have "you" as an indirect object of the performative verb. In the sentence "I pledge allegiance to the flag" the deep structure is _______________________________.
_________________________________. (1a)
*What is the deep structure of the sentence "I promise that Henry will be here on Wednesday"?— _____________________________________________________.
Expressives. Expressives characteristically require a nominalization transformations of the verb, which are often gerundive. We say:
