Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Antonio Sagona, The Archaeology of the Caucasus From Earliest Settlements to the Iron Age .pdf
Скачиваний:
122
Добавлен:
28.12.2021
Размер:
96 Мб
Скачать
☆

The Talish Tradition

419

Settlements

Samtavro also provides a glimpse of Iron Age domestic dwellings. Nestled along terraces on the slope of the hillside above the cemetery, the houses were square in plan and sunken slightly into the ground.Their walls were built with riverine pebbles held together with a mud mortar, which was used to render the walls on both surfaces. Although there is no direct evidence, it is assumed roofs were fl at, with the roof of the house below acting as a porch for the dwelling above.Timber poles acted as roof supports. One or two were placed in the centre of the room, whereas the others were positioned against the walls, especially in the corners. Fixtures in the house included an oven, dome-shaped and generally situated in the south-west corner, and a raised platform, one example of which had a high back surmounted by four anthropomorphic clay sculptures. Bell-shaped storage pits were also dug into the floors.

Dwellings at Treligorebi are next to the cemetery and terraced down the slopes of the ridge. Storage in the houses was in ceramic jars set into the floor. One house dating to the eighth–seventh centuries BC contained wheat and grape seeds, also found at Narekvavi in a contemporary context.67

THE TALISH TRADITION

Of the Late Bronze Age to Iron Age I traditions, we know least about the Talish, which occupies the mountainous south-eastern corner of Azerbaijan. Its cultural connections extend along the southern shores of the Caspian Sea into the provinces of Gilan and Mazandarn in Iran. We are still very much dependent on Jacques de Morgan’s important early work in the Lenkoran region, which he carried out with his brother, Henri, from April through June 1890, though more recent studies, including a number in northern Iran, are starting to bring this tradition into sharper focus.68

At present, our picture of the Talish is dominated by evidence from burials, though recent French-Azerbaijani excavations at Cucu Tuk have exposed sections of a circular building that look promising. Other important cemetery sites are Kraveladi, Mistail, Hovil, Cönü, Amarat, and Monidigah. Four types of tombs have been recorded in the Lenkoran (also Lankaran) Valley on the Caspian Sea. One is a stone cist tomb of the variety we have already

67Abramishvili et al. 1997: 26.

68De Morgan 1896: 13–125. For early discussions, see Iessen 1935 and Schaeffer 1948: 404– 43. More recent studies include Makhmudov 2008, Castelluccia 2016, and those that concern the Gilan and Mazandarn region in Iran, such as Piller 2012. Based on a paper (Ritual and Burial Practices during the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in the Southern Caucasus) delivered at the Caspian Sea Shores conference (Saint-Germain-en-Laye, 4–5 December, 2015), the new French-Azerbaijani Archaeological Mission to the Lenkoran Valley, initiated in 2012, holds many prospects.

420 From Fortresses to Fragmentation

encountered – an earthen pit lined with stones of varying sizes. It is covered with a tumulus of earth about 3 to 4 m high that has a diameter measuring no more than 10 m. In general, a few individuals were interred in the chamber. The second type is a cromlech – a single row of stones – sometimes the stones did not abut each other – encircling a stone cist tomb sealed by a heap of stones. Rectangular, oval, and circular cist tombs were reported.Another group of chambers is distinguished by its plan: one end is squared-off and sealed by a large slab of stone that was stood on its edge, whereas the opposite end was intentionally shaped into an apse with smaller stones. Finally, there are the dolmens, built with megalithic stones and sometimes with a pitched roof capped with a large stone.These belong to a different cultural tradition to those discussed in Chapter 6, though they share similarities in terms of funerary customs. Usually found covered with a mound of small stones, these impressive structures are a distinguishing feature of the Talish region. Overall, the stones used for all four types were field rocks that required minimal shaping to fl atten one side, which generally faced the interior of the chamber.

Mortuary practices varied from tombs without a skeleton to others that housed multiple burials. Even graves without a skeleton always had some funerary items: Kraveladi Tomb 11, for instance, contained five clay vessels and a bronze pin; Tomb 40 had two vessels and a spearhead.69 Quite a different custom is seen in the oval cist tomb from Veri, where four individuals were interred. At one end of the tomb were a cluster of long bones and a skull. Another skull was positioned in approximately the centre of the tomb, and the two others were placed along the wall. Each skull was surrounded with small bronze items, mostly jewellery, and five swords (two crossed) were placed in one half of the tomb. On top of this deposit of metalwork were eleven clay vessels. Clusters of long bones, skulls and grave goods are found in another tomb atVeri, which contained two individuals.

Dolmens also do not appear to conform to any one burial custom. One structure at Hovil had an individual skeleton on its back, fl anked by pots and covered with bronze weapons – a sword was placed across the upper legs.70 Another dolmen atVanu Barra had two chambers. In the larger compartment, the skeleton was found on its left side, knees bent, and behind its back were ten pots; while in the smaller chamber, mourners had placed a solitary jar.Yet another variation was documented at Cönü, which contained six individuals whose long bones were roughly clustered around their skulls.

The cultural connections of the Lenkoran region of Azerbaijan extend along the southern Caspian Sea littoral into the Persian Talish region, where several sites – including Marlik, the burial place of a rich and powerful dynasty – are situated.As we have noted elsewhere, the artisans and local smiths – gold, silver,

69De Morgan 1896: figs 22 and 23.

70De Morgan 1896: fig. 34.

Conclusion

421

and bronze – of this highland region blended their own traditions with the tastes arriving from neighbouring territories. Connections are especially clear in jewellery and personal ornaments, weapons, and ceramics.71

There are swords and daggers of the types we have encountered, but with variant features. Some have a tanged triangular blade and sloping shoulder with three rivet holes to secure the handle. Others are cast in one piece with a raised ricasso at the hilt to accommodate bone or wood.These weapons are distinguished by a raised midrib running the full length of the blade and a circular motif placed just below the shoulder.The most eye-catching, however, is the broad-shouldered dagger with a wide crescent-shaped pommel. Beads of one shape or another, some bearing granulation, and round pendants with astral symbols hammered into relief from the back share similarities with items from the PersianTalish and also Armenian sites of the Lchashen tradition.72 But perhaps the most telling sign that the Lenkoran region is linked to northern Iran is seen in its ceramics, in particular the footed drinking cups with a pair of handles, and ryhta with extended spouts that recall the vessels with bridgeless spouts from Iran. Schaeffer’s early study placed the material from Mistan and Razgour within the period 1550–1450 BC, withVeri still later (1450–1350 BC).This attribution is about right, but can now be brought in line with the growing evidence from Iran.

CONCLUSION

Around the middle of the second millennium, the southern Caucasus witnessed the rise of a new social order and the transformation of the built environment. If the period before 1500 BC in the southern Caucasus might be dubbed the ‘Age of Elites’, the economic, social, and political changes that occurred after that date, before the advent of empires, might warrant the term the ‘Age of Sovereignty’.This takes a cue from work carried out in Armenia that has shown that with the emergence of fortresses we see the rise of political authorities.73 We do not know these sovereigns by name – literacy did not appear until the mid-first millennium BC – yet we are aware of the changes they initiated. Dramatic alterations to the physical landscape like digging irrigation channels and the asymmetrical distribution of materials across the territory point to some form of early polity.

Although the eight or so centuries we have just covered have attracted much attention amongst researchers, it is not possible to isolate events with any historical precision. Even so, we are able to note certain key developments that affected the southern Caucasus. A marked trend towards fortification is

71Piller 2012, especially n. 25.

72Piller 2012.

73Smith 2015: 154–85.

422 From Fortresses to Fragmentation

visible. At present, detailed studies in the southern Caucasus have come out of Armenia, where quite a number of forts on hilltops have been recorded. Similar field work needs to be carried out in neighbouring southern Georgia, eastern Anatolia, and north-western Iran, areas that also harbour these hill forts. Communities in the Tsaghkahovit Plain practiced an agro-pastoral economy, with herding strategies focused on secondary products.The presence of enclosures across the landscape suggests that the built environment comprised a range of settlement types from permanent to seasonal.

While the ostentatious burials of the early second millennium disappeared, bronze metallurgy peaked in terms of technical sophistication, diversity and quantity. Metal weaponry, horse trappings, and jewellery formed part of the large provisions in burials. Given the explosion of bronze-work across the Caucasus generally and the ‘sameness’ of artefact types it seems that not only was knowledge transferred, but objects too were moved considerable distances before they reached their final destinations. Even ceramics, we are now learning, were part of this movement, though it is more likely the commodity they contained than the vessels themselves that was in demand. All this is evidence of powerful exchange networks.

CHAPTER 9

SMITHS, WARRIORS, AND WOMENFOLK : THE KOBAN CULTURE OF THE NORTHERN CAUCASUS (140 0 – 6 0 0 BC)

When Ernest Chantre, deputy director of the museum of Lyon, began excavations in 1881 at the necropolis of Koban, south-west of Vladikavkaz, during his second mission to the Caucasus, little did he know that his findings would become a lynchpin in the archaeology of the region for many decades to come.1 Several cemeteries situated amid rocky crags and foothills have yielded a staggering amount of sophisticated bronze objects.A multitude of weapons, jewellery, horse gear, and much more besides, collectively known as the ‘Koban Culture’, attest to the skilfulness and creativity of the artisans – metalsmiths whose workshops are to this day barely understood.The tonnage of metalwork also speaks loudly for the appetite these mountain communities had for bronze objects, and the role that these items played in the social and ritual life of the highlanders.

Almost all our evidence for the Koban culture is derived from grave provisions and hoards, even though many settlements are known. Despite this lopsided view, there is a deeply embedded sense of place. At Koban, for instance, where more than 600 burials have been documented, there is a long and conservative ritual tradition inextricably coupled with the land.These burials and their furnishings also reflect a new social outlook. Communities now assumed a corporate structure whose members were identified as part of a group rather than as individuals.This horizontal organisation, in which gender was clearly defined, did not promote the rise of elites and vertical social ranking, instead it stimulated a series of clearly defined territorial networks through which material culture was exchanged and adapted. Hence, tomb assemblages across the northern Caucasus have a sameness in terms of artefact categories, yet are distinguishable in terms of locally specific designs.

1 Chantre 1881, 1883, 1886. See alsoVirchow 1883.

423