- •Categories of the Verb in me
- •4.Changes within the system of Strong and Weak verbs in me
- •The Old English vowel System
- •5. The Morphological Classification of the oe verbs.
- •Irregular verbs
- •6 Rise of the Article System in me.
- •7The oe Consonant System
- •8Changes within the Adjective System in me
- •9The Non-Finite forms of the Verb in oe.
- •10Changes within the Pronoun System in me.
- •12 Changes within the Noun System in me.
- •11Oe vowels. Development of Vowels in Unstressed Syllables in oe.
- •13Principal features of Germanic Languages.
- •14 Changes within the consonant s to system in me.
- •17Word stress in Indo-European and Common Germanic
- •15Strong, Weak, Preterito-Present and Anomalous verbs in oe.
- •Strong verbs
- •Weak verbs
- •16Formation of New Diphthongs in me.
- •20Me vowels: Quantitative changes.
- •21Verner’s Law. Rhotacism
- •22Me vowels: Qualitative changes
- •Middle English New English
- •Middle English New English
- •Middle English New English
- •23Common Germanic Vowel Shift, Common Germanic Fracture Germanic Vowel Shift
- •24Scandinavian Borrowings in Middle e.
- •Many words with k sound before e and I, numerous words with sk sound are to be assigned to Scandinavian origin. Pronoun same and pronominal forms with initial th – they, their, them.
- •26French Borrowings in me.
- •27Indo-European and Germanic Ablaut
- •28Reduction of Vowels in Final Unstressed Syllable in me
- •Oe writan – wrat – writon – written
- •Written – wrot- written – written
- •29Basic grammatical Features of Germanic Languages.
- •32Changes within the System of Vowels in me
- •Oe writan – wrat – writon – written
- •Written – wrot- written – written
- •Quantitative changes
- •Lengthening of vowels
- •35Periods in the History of English
- •The period of lost endings
- •Changes within the Consonant System in Early New English
- •34. General characteristic of Middle English Grammar
- •The old English vowel system. Phonological Processes in oe and their Traces in Modern English (oe Breaking, Velar Umlaut, I-Umlaut, Palatal Diphon)
- •Umlauts
- •Development of vocabulary in Mod e.
- •Indian: bungalow, indigo Chinese: coolie, tea
- •46. The Linguistic Consequences of the Scandinavian Invasion.
- •The categories of the oe adjective and their further development
- •48. The Linguistic Consequences of the Norman Conquest.
- •Development of vowels in oe
- •Formation of the national literary English Language
- •Latin Borrowings thought the development of the English language
- •The declension of the Noun in oe. Types of stems.
- •Vowel-stems. Declension of a-stem nouns.
- •55. Me dialects.
- •Development of Consonants in oe
- •Development of Non-finite forms of the Verb in the English language
- •Participle I. Has the ending –ende and is declined as a weak adjective. It is used attributively (in pre- and post-position) and predicative.
- •Grammatical categories of the Noun in oe.
- •The pronoun in oe
- •The adjective in oe
- •Changes within the verb system in Modern English
- •You shall do it – necessity
- •I will do it – volition
- •I should be present – to show events which are probable, though problematic
- •I should be present – to show imaginary events contrary to fact.
- •Verbal grammatical categories in oe
- •Ic write (singular) We writa.. (plural) tense
- •Strong verbs in oe
- •Weak verbs in oe
- •Class II – the stem suffix –oi
- •Latin borrowings thought the development of the English language
- •Verbs ending in –ate, -ute
- •Peretrite-present verbs in oe and their further development
- •Oe vocabulary
5. The Morphological Classification of the oe verbs.
The verb system in OE was represented by two sets of forms: the finitive of the verb and the non-finitive forms of the verb. Those two types of forms differed more than they do today from the point of view of their respective grammatical categories, as the verbals at that historical period were not conjugated like the verb proper, but were declined like nouns or adjectives. Thus the infinitive could have two case-forms, which may conventionally be called the “Common” case and the “Dative” case. The so-called Common case form of the Infinitive was widely used indifferent syntactical functions, the Dative case was used on a limited scale and mainly when the Infinitive functioned as an adverbial modifier of purpose. The participle had a well-developed system of forms, the declension of the participle resembling greatly the declension of adjectives. The system of conjugation of the OE verb was built up by four grammatical categories. Person. There were three person forms in OE: 1, 2, 3. But we have distinct person forms only in the Indicative mood, the Imperative and the Oblique mood forms reflecting no person differences and even the Indicative mood forms changing for person only in the Singular, the plural forms being the same irrespective of person. Number. The grammatical category of number was built up by the opposition of two number forms –Singular and Plural. Tense. The grammatical category of tense was represented by two forms: Present tense and Past tense. There was no Future tense in OE, future events were expressed with the help of a present tense + an adverb denoting futurity or by a combination of a modal verb + an Infinitive. Mood. There were three moods forms in OE: Indicative, Imperative and Oblique. The Indicative Mood and the Imperative Mood were used in cases similar to those in which they are used now. But the Oblique mood in OE differed greatly from the corresponding mood in NE. There was only one mood form in OE that was used both to express events that are thought of as unreal or as problematic – today there are two mood forms to denote those two different kinds of events, conventionally called the Subjunctive and the Conjunctive. The forms of the Oblique Mood were also sometimes used in contexts for which now the indicative mood would be more suitable – to present vents in the so-called “Indirect speech”.
Morphological Classification
The verbs are divided in two: Strong verbs (7 classes), weak verbs (3 classes) and other verbs (suppletive, irregular, preterite-present verbs)
Strong verbs
The vowel interchange or ablaut which was the principal grammatical means in the conjugation of the OE strong verbs was of two kinds: qualitative and quantitative. The 1-5 classes are mainly based on the qualitative ablaut, the 6th class – on the quantitative ablaut, 7th class – formed their principal forms by means of the so-called reduplication of the root syllable, but in the course of the development of the language that means was obliterated. The OE qualitative ablaut is akin to the Common Germanic and even Indo-European ablaut.
Weak verbs
The OE weak verbs are relatively younger than the strong verbs. They reflected a later stage in the development of Germanic lang. They were an open class in OE as new verbs that entered the language generally formed their forms on analogy with the weak verbs. Whereas the strong verbs used vowel-interchange as a means of differentiation among principal verb stems, the weak verbs used for that purpose suffixation, namely, suffixes –t, or –d. for example: cepan – cepte – cept The strong verbs were “root-stem” verbs, they did not have any stem-forming suffix following the root, but they added their grammatical endings to the root directly. The weak verbs, however, had a stem-forming suffix that followed the root and preceded the grammatical ending. In accordance with the character of the stem-suffix the weak verbs are subdivided into three classes. Class I – the stem suffix –i (the class includes many verbs formed from other nouns, adjectives or verbs). All of them have a front root vowel – the result of palatal mutation due to the –i element of the stem-suf). Class II – the stem suf – oi (the o-element of the suffix is preserved in the past tense and in the Past Participle).
