- •М инистерство образования и науки РоссиЙской Федерации южно-уральский государственный университет
- •Шакурова г. Л.
- •Челябинск
- •Введение
- •Контрольная работа №1
- •Часть I
- •Контрольная работа №2
- •Часть I
- •Часть I
- •Контрольная работа №4
- •Часть I
- •Контрольная работа №5
- •Часть I
- •Контрольная работа №3
- •Types of Partnerships
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Comprehension Questions
- •Vocabulary Practice
- •Grammar exercises
- •Business Corporations
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Comprehension Questions
- •Vocabulary Practice
- •Grammar exercises
- •Executive’s Functions Dialogue
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Vocabulary exercises
- •Grammar exercises
- •Organization Structure
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Comprehension Questions
- •Vocabulary Practice
- •Grammar exercises
- •Business and Banks
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Vocabulary Practice
- •Grammar exercises
- •Marketing
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Comprehension Questions
- •Vocabulary Practice
- •Dialogue
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Vocabulary Practice
- •Active Vocabulary
- •Family Dialogue
- •Семья Диалог
- •My visiting card Dialogue
- •Моя визитная карточка Диалог
- •Education Dialogue
- •Образование Диалог
- •Learning Foreign Languages Dialogue
- •Изучаем иностранные языки Диалог
- •Choosing a Career Dialogue
- •Выбор профессии Диалог
- •Young People’s Problems Dialogue
- •Проблемы молодёжи Диалог
- •1 Work and jobs
- •2 Ways of working
- •Old and new ways
- •3 Recruitment and selection
- •Recruitment
- •Applying for a job
- •Selection procedures
- •3.1 Complete the crossword. Use appropriate forms of words from а, в and с opposite.
- •3.2 How divide die words in 3.1 into two groups:
- •3.3 Replace the underlined phrases with correct forms of words and expressions from a. В and с opposite.
- •Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering
- •Idef5 Method Report
- •1 Executive Summary
- •1.1 Motivations
- •1.1.1 Motivations for Ontology
- •1.1.2 Motivations for an Ontology Development Method
- •1.2 Benefits of Ontology Development
- •1.3 Overview of the Report
- •1.4 The Connection Between idef5 and Other Methods
- •2 Conceptual Foundations of Ontology
- •2.1 The Nature of Ontological Inquiry
- •Contents
- •1.Чехович д.Р. Английский язык для менеджеров . Ч.1 Челябинск 2008г.
- •2.Антонов о.И. Английский язык для бизнесмена. Москва 2010г.
- •3.К.Дж. Поллак Ролевые и ситуативные диалоги. Санкт-Петербург 2010г.
1.3 Overview of the Report
The sections following this executive summary jointly constitute a comprehensive report on the
IDEF5 ontology capture method. Section 2 of the report provides a detailed discussion of the
conceptual foundations of IDEF5. It begins by tracing the roots of ontological inquiry, with
8
respect to engineering and manufacturing, to the classical philosophical tradition — also known
as “ontology” — of characterizing and classifying what ultimately exists. From this tradition
springs the central concepts of ontology: kinds (roughly, classes or types), properties, attributes,
relations, parts and wholes, and processes. Most of Section 2 is devoted to explicating and
relating these concepts. The section closes with a discussion of the need for a separate ontology
method distinct from existing methods. (The relation of the ontology capture method with
existing IDEF methods is discussed in Subsection 1.3.)
Section 3 provides a practical method for the construction of ontologies. Ontology development
requires extensive iterations, discussions, reviews, and introspection. Knowledge extraction is
usually a discovery process and requires considerable introspection. It requires a process that
incorporates both significant expert involvement as well as the dynamics of a group effort.
Given the open-ended nature of ontological analyses, it is not prudent to adopt a “cookbook”
approach to ontology development. We recommend the use of a general procedure along with a
set of useful guidelines. Section 3 describes the mechanics of such a process for potential IDEF5
ontology developers.
In brief, the IDEF5 ontology development process consists of the following five activities.
1. Organizing and Scoping This activity involves establishing the purpose, viewpoint,
and context for the ontology development project and assigning roles to the team
members.
2. Data Collection This activity involves acquiring the raw data needed for ontology
development.
3. Data Analysis This activity involves analyzing the data to facilitate ontology extraction.
4. Initial Ontology Development This activity involves developing a preliminary
ontology from the acquired data.
5. Ontology Refinement and Validation This activity involves refining and validating the
ontology to complete the development process.
Although the above activities are listed sequentially, there is a significant amount of overlap and
iteration between the activities. These activities, and their interconnections, are described in
detail in Section 3.
9
Section 4 contains a description of the IDEF5 ontology languages. There are two such
languages: the IDEF5 schematic language and the IDEF5 elaboration language. The schematic
language is a graphical language that has been specially tailored to enable domain experts to
express the most common forms of ontological information, especially with the aid of an
automated ontology capture tool. This enables average users both to input the basic information
needed for a first-cut ontology and to augment or revise existing ontologies with new
information.
There is a price for the relative ease of use of the schematic language, viz., that it lacks the full
expressive power needed to capture general ontology information. To capture such information
is the purpose of the IDEF elaboration language. The elaboration language is a structured text
language with the full expressive power of first-order logic and set theory. This enables a user to
express virtually any condition, or relation, or fact that one might need to express to characterize
a given kind of thing, or property, or relation, or process found in a domain. In addition to set
theoretic constructs, the language also includes specialized constructs for expressing ontology
information in the particular format of IDEF5. This makes for easy translation from the
schematic language into the elaboration language, and vice versa, insofar as that is possible.
Finally, the report concludes with two appendices. The first is the (current) IDEF5 relation
library of reusable ontology elements. This library is a rich repository of information consisting
of a set of characterizations of (i.e., definitions and axioms for) commonly used relations. It
provides a repository of formally defined and characterized relations that can be reused and
customized in a particular project. The relation library itself is a specialized ontology: an
ontology of commonly used relations. The motivation for this library grew out of the previously
mentioned analogy with software engineering. Often in software development, the same kinds of
routines are used again and again in different programs by (in general) different programmers.
The development of ontologies will face the same sort of problem. It is likely that the same or
similar relations will appear in a number of different ontologies. The role of a library of relations
such as the one presented in Appendix A will be to enable modelers to reuse and customize
relations that have been defined in previously captured ontologies. The library can also be used
as a reference for the different ways to define and characterize relations and illustrative examples
of the use of the IDEF5 elaboration language. All definitions and characterizing axioms in the
library have been written using the IDEF5 elaboration language. Thus, the library can also serve
as a useful learning tool for mastering the IDEF5 elaboration language. Finally, the library is
extensible in that any relation that has been formally defined and characterized may be added to
it.
10
The second appendix consists of the BNF specification of the IDEF5 elaboration language to
ensure that the language is well-defined. A glossary for the report follows this appendix.
