- •Releasing Tasks
- •Introduction to Page Quality Rating
- •Understanding Webpages and Websites
- •Important Definitions
- •What is the Purpose of a Webpage?
- •Your Money or Your Life (ymyl) Pages
- •Understanding Webpage Content
- •2.4.1 Identifying the Main Content (mc)
- •2.4.3 Identifying Advertisements/Monetization (Ads)
- •2.4.2 Identifying the Supplementary Content (sc)
- •2.4.4 Summary of the Parts of the Page
- •Understanding the Website
- •2.5.1 Finding the Homepage
- •2.5.2 Finding Who is Responsible for the Website and Who Created the Content on the Page
- •2.5.3 Finding About Us, Contact Information, and Customer Service Information
- •Website Maintenance
- •Website Reputation
- •2.7.1 Reputation Research
- •2.7.2 Sources of Reputation Information
- •2.7.3 Customer Reviews of Stores/Businesses
- •2.7.4 How to Search for Reputation Information
- •2.7.5 What to Do When You Find No Reputation Information
- •Overall Page Quality Rating Scale
- •High Quality Pages
- •Characteristics of High Quality Pages
- •A Satisfying Amount of High Quality Main Content
- •A High Level of Expertise/Authoritativeness/Trustworthiness (e-a-t)
- •Positive Reputation
- •Helpful Supplementary Content
- •Functional Page Design
- •A Satisfying Amount of Website Information
- •A Well Cared For and Maintained Website
- •Examples of High Quality Pages
- •Highest Quality Pages
- •Very High Quality mc
- •Very High Level of e-a-t
- •Very Positive Reputation
- •Examples of Highest Quality Pages
- •6.0 Low Quality Pages
- •Low Quality Main Content
- •Unsatisfying Amount of Main Content
- •Lacking Expertise, Authoritativeness, or Trustworthiness (e-a-t)
- •Negative Reputation
- •Characteristics Which May Be Evidence of Low Quality
- •6.5.1 Unhelpful or Distracting Supplementary Content
- •6.5.2 Lacking Supplementary Content
- •6.5.3 Poor Page Design
- •6.5.4 Lacking Care and Maintenance
- •Unsatisfying Amount of Information about the Website
- •Examples of Low Quality Pages
- •7.0 Lowest Quality Pages
- •Harmful or Malicious Pages
- •Lack of Purpose Pages
- •Deceptive Pages
- •7.3.1 Deceptive Page Purpose
- •7.3.2 Deceptive Page Design
- •7.3.3 Sneaky Redirects
- •Lowest Quality Main Content
- •7.4.1 No Main Content
- •7.4.2 “Keyword Stuffed” Main Content
- •7.4.3 Gibberish or Meaningless Main Content
- •7.4.4 Automatically-Generated Main Content
- •7.4.5 Copied Main Content
- •7.4.6 More About Copied Content
- •7.4.7 How to Determine if Content is Copied
- •No Website Information
- •Highly Untrustworthy, Unreliable, Unauthoritative, Inaccurate, or Misleading
- •Abandoned Websites or Spammed Pages on a Website
- •Extremely Negative or Malicious Reputation
- •Examples of Lowest Quality Pages
- •8.0 Medium Quality Pages
- •Examples of Medium Quality Pages
- •9.0 Page Quality Rating: Important Considerations
- •Instructions for Rating Page Quality Tasks
- •The Top Three pq Considerations
- •Page Quality Considerations for Specific Types of Pages
- •Ratings for Encyclopedia Pages
- •Ratings for Pages with Error Messages or No mc
- •Ratings for Forums and q&a pages
- •Page Quality Rating faQs
- •Understanding Mobile Users, Mobile Queries, and Mobile Results
- •Important Rating Definitions and Ideas
- •Understanding the Query
- •Task Location (Locale) and User Location
- •Queries with an Explicit Location
- •Queries with Multiple Meanings
- •Query Meanings Can Change Over Time
- •Understanding User Intent
- •Know and Know Simple Queries
- •Do and Device Action Queries
- •Website Queries
- •Visit-in-Person Queries and User Location
- •Queries with Multiple User Intents
- •Understanding Result Blocks
- •Web Search Result Block Examples
- •Special Content Result Block Examples
- •Device Action Result Block Examples
- •How Device Action Results are Displayed in Rating Tasks
- •Rating Using the Needs Met Scale
- •Rating on Your Phone Issues
- •Rating Result Blocks: Block Content and Landing Pages
- •Fully Meets (FullyM)
- •Examples of Fully Meets (FullyM) Result Blocks
- •Examples of Result Blocks that Cannot be Fully Meets
- •Highly Meets (hm)
- •Examples of Highly Meets (hm) Result Blocks
- •Moderately Meets (mm)
- •Examples of Moderately Meets (mm) Result Blocks
- •Slightly Meets (sm)
- •Examples of Slightly Meets (sm) Result Blocks
- •Fails to Meet (FailsM)
- •Examples of Fails to Meet (FailsM) Result Blocks
- •14.0 Rating Porn, Foreign Language, Didn’t Load, and Hard to Use Results
- •Porn Flag
- •Needs Met Rating for Porn Results
- •Needs Met Rating for Clear Non-Porn Intent Queries
- •Needs Met Rating for Possible Porn Intent Queries
- •Needs Met Rating for Clear Porn Intent Queries
- •Reporting Illegal Images
- •Foreign Language Flag
- •14.4.1 Using the Foreign Language Flag
- •14.4.2 Needs Met Ratings for Foreign Language Results
- •14.4.3 English Language Results
- •Didn’t Load Flag
- •14.5.1 Using the Didn’t Load Flag
- •14.5.2 Needs Met Rating for Didn’t Load Results
- •Hard to Use Flag
- •14.6.1 Using the Hard to Use Flag
- •The Relationship between e-a-t and Needs Met
- •Rating Queries with Multiple Interpretations and Intents
- •Rating Queries with Both Website and Visit-in-Person Intent
- •Specificity of Queries and Landing Pages
- •Needs Met Rating and Freshness
- •Misspelled and Mistyped Queries and Results
- •Misspelled and Mistyped Queries
- •19.2 Name Queries
- •19.3 Spelling Suggestion Result Blocks
- •21.0 Product Queries: Action (Do) vs. Information (Know) Intent
- •22.0 Rating Visit-in-Person Intent Queries
- •26.0 Needs Met Task Page Screenshot
- •27.0 Notes about Using the Needs Met Rating Interface
- •28.0 Using the “Report a Problem / Release this Task” Button
- •29.0 Reporting Results with Duplicate Landing Pages
- •Rater-Identified Duplicates
Rating on Your Phone Issues
We understand that raters using different phones, operating systems, and browsers may have different experiences. In general, do what you would do naturally, and rate based on your experience. Here are some additional points to keep in mind when you are rating on your phone:
If you see one of these messages when you open a landing page on your phone:
Asks whether you want to open the page in the browser or the website’s app: select and evaluate the webpage. However, if the result automatically opens an app by default based on your phone’s
settings (e.g. some users have set all YouTube pages to automatically open the result in the YouTube app), you should rate your natural app experience—you do not have to change your phone’s default settings.
Asks whether you want to visit the mobile page or desktop page: it is fine to select the mobile page as long as the landing page is the same. Sometimes, the mobile option will bring you to the mobile homepage instead of the specific URL in the task. You may need to check that the mobile page is in fact the same URL as the desktop page.
Please open and look at PDF files. Your experience may be easier or harder than other users depending on your phone and browser, but you should still open the PDF file and look at it.
Occasionally, you may be assigned some of these rating tasks on a desktop computer, but please rate from the perspective of a mobile user unless otherwise instructed.
When rating Device Action queries and Device Action Result Blocks, including queries for installing or opening apps, please assume that queries were issued on an Android device unless explicitly stated otherwise in the instructions.
Proprietary and Confidential – Copyright 2015 86
Part 3: Needs Met Rating Guideline
Rating Using the Needs Met Scale
There are many different kinds of queries and results, but the process of rating is the same: Needs Met rating tasks ask you to focus on mobile user needs and think about how helpful and satisfying the result is for the mobile users.
This is what the Needs Met rating slider looks like:
|
Rating |
|
Description |
|
|
Fully Meets (FullyM) |
|
A special rating category, which only applies to certain queries and results. All or almost all mobile |
|
|
|
users would be immediately and fully satisfied by the result and would not need to view other results |
|
|
|
|
|
to satisfy their need. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highly Meets (HM) |
|
Very helpful for many or most mobile users. Some users may wish to see additional results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderately Meets (MM) |
|
Helpful for many users OR very helpful for some mobile users. Some or many users may wish to see |
|
|
|
additional results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slightly Meets (SM) |
|
Helpful for fewer mobile users. There is a connection between the query and the result, but not a |
|
|
|
strong or satisfying connection. Many or most users would wish to see additional results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fails to Meet (FailsM) |
|
Completely fails to meet the needs of the mobile users. All users would wish to see additional results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please note that you may assign in-between ratings. Use in-between ratings if you think the rating of a result falls between two labels. You can either drag the slider or click on the point that you want the slider to land on.
Proprietary and Confidential – Copyright 2015 87
