- •Part one starting out
- •What is linguistics?
- •What is a linguist?
- •How does linguistics differ from traditional grammar?
- •The scope of linguistics
- •Questions
- •What is language?
- •Use of sound signals
- •The Need for Learning
- •Duality
- •Arbitrariness
- •Displacement
- •Creativity (Productivity)
- •Patterning
- •Structure dependence
- •Human language versus animal communication
- •Origin and functions of language
- •Questions
- •The study of language
- •Nineteenth century: historical linguistics
- •Early- to mid-20th century: descriptive linguistics
- •Generative linguistics and the search for universals
- •Questions
- •Deciding where to begin
- •Language as a game
- •Universal and particular
- •Questions
- •The inner circles
- •Sound patterns
- •Sorting out the basic sounds
- •The phonemes of English
- •Allophones
- •Sound combinations
- •Shared properties of phonemes
- •Metrical phonology
- •Questions
- •Words and pieces of words
- •Defining words
- •Morphemes
- •Recognition of morphemes
- •Types of morpheme
- •Allomorphs
- •Phonological conditioning
- •Word classes
- •Major word classes
- •Questions
- •Sentence patterns
- •Linking words together
- •Word order
- •Inflections
- •Function words
- •Constituent analysis
- •Tree diagrams
- •Rewrite rules
- •Identifying constituents
- •Adding in extra patterns
- •Layers of branches
- •Complex sentences
- •Questions
- •Meaning
- •Word meaning
- •Semantic fields
- •Coping with overlaps
- •Synonyms and opposites
- •Classification (inclusion)
- •The meaning of sentences
- •Questions
- •The outer rings
- •Using language
- •The cooperative principle
- •Speech acts
- •Remembered frameworks
- •Discourse analysis
- •Taking it in turns
- •Repairs
- •Politeness
- •Questions
- •Language and society
- •The notion of a language
- •Dialect and accent
- •Stylistic variation
- •Speech versus writing
- •The topic under discussion
- •The language of advertising
- •Change in language styles
- •Charting phonological variation
- •Phonological variation in British English
- •Social networks
- •Language and sex
- •Multilingual communities
- •Pidgins and Creoles
- •Questions
- •Language and mind
- •Psycholinguistic evidence
- •Acquiring language
- •The content-process controversy
- •The rule-governed nature of child language
- •Learning the meaning of words
- •Understanding syntax
- •Recognizing words
- •Speech production
- •Speech disorders
- •Language and the brain
- •Part four changes and comparisons
- •Language change
- •How language changes
- •Spread of change within a language
- •Causes of language change
- •Natural tendencies
- •Therapeutic changes
- •Changes which trigger one another off
- •Interacting changes
- •Reconstruction
- •Questions
- •Genetic similarities
- •Building a family tree
- •Reconstructing the parent language
- •Unreliability of reconstructions
- •Linguistic areas
- •Language types
- •Word order criteria
Pidgins and Creoles
Adopting a lingua franca is not the only solution to the problem of communication between groups of people speaking different languages. In some cases, a pidgin develops.
A pidgin is a restricted language system which arises in order to fulfil essential communication needs among people with no common language. It is no one's first language, and is used at first in a limited set of circumstances. Such a system typically develops on trade routes and in coastal areas.
A pidgin is usually based on one language, though it soon acquires an admixture of other languages, as well as independent constructions of its own. For example, Ток Pisin (also known as Melanesian Pidgin English and Neo-Melanesian) which is spoken in Papua New Guinea, is based on English, and many of the words sound somewhat like English ones:
Mi go long taun. 'I go/went to the town'.
Yu wokabaut long rot. ‘You walk/walked along the road'.
But there are plenty of others, which cannot be predicted from English, such as lotu 'church', diwai 'tree', susu 'milk'. In addition, it has acquired syntactic constructions which do not figure in English. For example, there is a consistent distinction between verbs with an object ('transitive' verbs) which take the ending -im, as with bagarapim 'wreck', and those without ('intransitive' verbs) as in bagarap 'collapse', 'break down':
— 118 —
Mi bagarapim ka bilongyu. 'I crashed your car'.
Kabilong mi i bagarap. 'My car broke down'.
Another innovation is the particle i which usually has to be placed before the verb (as in the second sentence above).
The phonology, syntax, and lexicon are simpler in a pidgin than in an ordinary language. There are fewer phonemes. In Ток Pisin, [pi and [f] are often merged, so are [s] and [l], and there are only five vowels. English 'fish' was borrowed as pis, and English 'ship' as sip. In order to avoid confusion, 'piss' (urinate) became pispis, and 'sheep' becamesipsip. There аre very few word endings, the sentences have a simple structure, and there is a small vocabulary. One or two items stretch over a wide area, as with the following uses of the word pikinini 'child':
pikinini man 'son' (lit. child man).
pikinini meri 'daughter' (lit. child woman).
pikininihos 'foal' (lit. child horse).
pikinini pis 'minnow' (lit. child fish).
pikinini bilong rais 'rice kernels' (lit. child of rice).
pikinini bilong diwai 'fruit of tree' (lit. child of tree).
Sometimes, pidgins die out of their own accord. At other times they increase in importance, and become used in more and more areas of life. If someone then acquires a pidgin as a first language - perhaps because of intermarriage between people whose only common language is the pidgin - the language has then become a creole.
Once it has become a creole, the system tends to develop rapidly. Speech is speeded up, the syntax becomes more complex, and extra vocabulary items are created. Fairly soon, if it continues to develop, a creole is likely to be indistinguishable from a 'full' language.
In some circumstances, however, a creole can be devoured by its parent. If a creole is spoken in an area where the base language is also used, then there may be social pressure on the creole speakers to speak the base, which often has more prestige. Therefore, little by little, the creole becomes decreolized, as words and constructions from the base language replace the creole ones.
The study of pidgins and creoles has grown rapidly, because their implications and interest spread far beyond sociolinguistics. They are valuable for the insights they provide into language change, and some people have claimed that they shed light on language universals- that they present language in a stripped down and basic state. This claim is controversial, but the interest it has aroused has increased the
–119–
attention given to the topic. Only time will tell whether such grandiose claims are justified.
However, language universals are more commonly associated with the study of language and mind. This is the topic of the next chapter.
