Список литературы

1. Lahd W. Н. et al. Efficacy of the post-traumatic cross table lateral view of the cervi­cal spine.—Emerg. Med., 1985, 2:243.

2. More S.E. Emergency evaluation of cervical spine injuries: CT versus radio­graphs.—Ann. Emerg. Med., 1985, 14(I0):973.

3. Streitweiser D. R. et al. Accuracy of standard radiographic views in detecting cervical spine fractures.—Ann. Emerg. Med., 1983, 12(9):538.

4. Jackson N.E. The Achilles' neck and other vulnerable vertebrae.— Emerg. Med., 1977, 9:22.

5. Williams C.F. Essentiality of the lateral cervical spine radiograph.—Ann. Emerg. Med., 1981, I0(4y.l98.

6. White A. A. et al. Biochemical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine.— Clin. Orthop., 1975, 109:85.

7. Harris J. H. Radiology of Acute Cervical Spine Trauma. Baltimore, Williams anld Wilkins, 1978.

8. Weir D. C. Roentgenographs signs of cervical injury.— Clin. Orthop., 1975, 109:9.

9. Penning L. Obtaining and interpreting plain films in the cervical injury.— In: The Cervical Spine Research Society/Ed. R. W. Bailey.— The Cervical Spine. Philadelp­hia, J. B. Lippincott, 1983, p. 62.

10. Kim K. S. et al. Pitfalls in plain film diagnosis of the cervical spine injury: Positive in­terpretation.—Surg. Neurol., 1986, 25:381.

Дополнительная литература

Barrow D.L. et al. Clinical indications for computer-assisted iyelography.—

Neurosurgery, 1983, 12(1):47. Brant-Zawadzki M. et al. CT in the evaluation of spine trauma.— AJR, 1981, 136(2):369. Cacayorin E.D., Kieffer S.A. Applications and limitations of computed tomography of

the spine.—Radiol. Clin. North Am., 1982, 20(1): 185. Clark W.M. et al. Twelve significant signs of cervical spine trauma.— Skeletal Radiol.,

1979, 3:201.

Post M. J. D. et al. The value of computed tomography in spinal trauma.— Spine, 1982, 7(5):417.

Maravilla K. R. et al. The influence of thin section tomography of the treatment of cervi­cal spine injuries.— Radiology, 1978, 127(4): 131.

McAfee P. C. et al. Comparison of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of upper cervical spinal cord compression.— Spine, 1986, 11(4):295.

Paushter D. N. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine: Applications and limita­tions.—Radiol. Clin. North Am., 1985, 23(3):551.

Roub L. W:, Drayer B. P. Spinal computer tomography: Limitations and applications. AJR, 1979, 133:267.

Schaffer M. A., Doris P. E. Limitation of the cross-table lateral view in detecting cervical spine injuries. A retrospective analysis.—Ann. Emerg. Med., 1981, 10(IO):508.

Stratemeier P. H. Evalution of the lumbar spine: A comparison between computed to­mography and myelography.—Radiol. Clin. North Am., 1983, 21(2):221.

Wang A. et al. Spinal cord or nerve root compression in patients with malignant disease: CT evaluation.—J. Computer Assist. Tomogr., 1984, 8(3):420.

Глава 10 переломы, вывихи, подвывихи

Для адекватной оценки травмы шейного отдела позвоночника необходимо, чтобы врач неотложной помощи имел упорядочен­ное и полное представление о травмах позвоночника. Как и врач, оказывающий первую помощь или ставящий первичный диагноз, он должен конкретно знать специфические особенности по­вреждения шейного отдела позвоночника, включая ме­ханизм травмы, приложение сил, возможные виды риска, сопут­ствующие повреждения и первичное лечение.